浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京医院药学部/北京市药物临床风险与个体化应用评价重点实验室(北京医院),北京;100730
2.国家老年医学中心/中国医学科学院老年医学研究院,北京 100730
3.中央军委联合参谋部警卫局卫生保健处,北京 100017
4.北京医院检验科,北京 100730
副主任药师。研究方向:医院药学、循证药学。E-mail:12686@qq.com
主任药师,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:医院药学、循证药学、药物分析。E-mail:j790101@163.com
纸质出版日期:2022-11-15,
收稿日期:2022-03-21,
修回日期:2022-09-30,
扫 描 看 全 文
郑子恢,高峰,张亚同等.降钙素治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的快速卫生技术评估 Δ[J].中国药房,2022,33(21):2654-2659.
ZHENG Zihui,GAO Feng,ZHANG Yatong,et al.Rapid health technology assessment of calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(21):2654-2659.
郑子恢,高峰,张亚同等.降钙素治疗绝经后骨质疏松症的快速卫生技术评估 Δ[J].中国药房,2022,33(21):2654-2659. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.21.17.
ZHENG Zihui,GAO Feng,ZHANG Yatong,et al.Rapid health technology assessment of calcitonin in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(21):2654-2659. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.21.17.
目的
2
评价降钙素治疗绝经后骨质疏松症(PMOP)的有效性、安全性和经济性,为临床用药决策提供循证医学证据。
方法
2
计算机检索the Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase、中国知网、万方数据库、中国生物医学文献服务系统和卫生技术评估(HTA)机构官方网站,收集降钙素治疗PMOP的系统评价(SR)/Meta分析、药物经济学研究和HTA报告,检索时限均为建库至2022年9月30日。由2位研究者独立进行文献筛选、数据提取及质量评价,并对数据结果进行描述性分析。
结果
2
共纳入18项研究,包括12项SR/Meta分析和6项药物经济学研究,未检索到HTA报告。在有效性方面,所纳入的研究结果基本一致:降钙素在降低椎体骨折发生率方面除对比单独使用钙剂和拉索昔芬可能有一定优势外,相比其他阳性药物均未体现出临床优势;在降低非椎体骨折发生率方面,降钙素除对比单独使用钙剂和雷洛昔芬可能有一定优势外,相比其他阳性药物均未体现出临床优势;在提高椎体骨密度(BMD)方面,仅有2项研究表明降钙素相比钙剂有一定优势,和其他阳性药物相比未见临床优势;在提高非椎体BMD方面,仅有1项研究表明降钙素与钙剂合用相比单独使用钙剂对提高股骨BMD有一定优势,和其他阳性药物相比未见临床优势;在降低骨痛评分方面,所纳入的2项研究均表明鼻用降钙素对减轻椎骨骨折患者的急性疼痛具有短期益处,对慢性疼痛患者无效。在安全性方面,所纳入的3项研究均表明降钙素相比其他阳性药物的不良反应更轻微,但长期使用有增加恶性肿瘤的风险。在经济性方面,只有1项研究表明使用鼻用降钙素治疗PMOP相比不治疗或使用依替膦酸盐治疗更具有经济学优势。
结论
2
降钙素对减轻PMOP椎体骨折患者的急性疼痛有一定作用,安全性有待进一步考察,未见明显经济学优势。
OBJECTIVE
2
According to the rapid Health Technology Assessment (HTA) for postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMOP), To evaluate the efficacy, safety and economy of calcitonin in the treatment of PMOP, and provide evidence-based medical evidence for clinical drug decision.
METHODS
2
Retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, Wanfang database, CBM and HTA official website, systematic review/meta-analysis, pharmacoeconomics research and HTA reports about calcitonin in the treatment of PMOP were retrieved from the inception to Sept. 30th, 2022. Two researchers independently carried out screening, data extraction and quality evaluation, and analyzed the data results descriptively.
RESULTS
2
A total of 18 studies were included, including 12 SR/meta-analysis and 6 economic studies, and no HTA report was retrieved. In terms of effectiveness, the results of the included studies were basically consistent: calcitonin had a certain advantage in reducing the incidence of vertebral fracture compared with calcium and lasoxifene alone, but did not show clinical advantage compared with other positive drugs. In terms of reducing the incidence of non-vertebral fractures, calcitonin had some advantages, compared with calcium alone and raloxifene, but did not show clinical advantage compared with other positive drugs. In terms of improving bone mineral density (BMD), only 2 studies showed that calcitonin had a certain advantage over calcium but no advantage was observed compared with other positive drugs. In terms of improving non-vertebral BMD, only 1 study showed that calcitonin combined with calcium had certain advantages compared with calcium alone in improving femoral BMD, but there was no advantage compared with other positive drugs. In terms of lowering bone pain scores, both included studies demonstrated short-term benefit of nasal calcitonin in reducing acute pain was found in patients with vertebral fractures, but not in patients with chronic pain. In terms of safety, the three included studies showed that calcitonin caused mild adverse reactions compared with other positive drugs, but there was a risk of malignant tumors after long-term use. In terms of economy, only 1 study showed the use of nasal calcitonin in the treatment of PMOP had more economic advantages than no treatment or etidronate.
CONCLUSIONS
2
Calcitonin has a certain effect on reducing acute pain in patients with PMOP vertebral fracture, and its safety needs further investigation. No obvious economic advantage has been found.
降钙素绝经后骨质疏松症卫生经济学快速卫生技术评估
postmenopausal osteoporosishealth economicsrapid health technology assessment
JEON Y K,KIM B H,KIM I J. The diagnosis of osteoporosis[J]. J Korean Med Assoc,2016,59(11):842.
Consensus development conference:diagnosis,prophylaxis,and treatment of osteoporosis[J]. Am J Med,1993,94(6):646-650.
SERIOLO B,PAOLINO S,CASABELLA A,et al. Osteoporosis in the elderly[J]. Aging Clin Exp Res,2013,25(1):27-29.
SI L,WINZENBERG T M,JIANG Q,et al. Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China:2010-2050[J]. Osteoporos Int,2015,26(7):1929-1937.
KANIS J A,MCCLOSKEY E V,JOHANSSON H,et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women[J]. Osteoporos Int,2013,24(1):23-57.
LOURES M A R,ZERBINI C A F,DANOWSKI J S,et al. Guidelines of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men[J]. Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed,2017,57(Suppl 2):497-514.
《中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南》工作组,中国老年学和老年医学学会骨质疏松分会,马远征,等.中国老年骨质疏松症诊疗指南:2018[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2018,24(12):1541-1565.
KANIS J A,COOPER C,RIZZOLI R,et al. European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women[J]. Osteoporos Int,2019,30(1):3-44.
EASTELL R,ROSEN C J,BLACK D M,et al. Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women:an endocrine society clinical practice guideline[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2019,104(5):1595-1622.
PRINCE R L,SMITH M,DICK I M,et al. Prevention of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A comparative study of exercise,calcium supplementation,and hormone-replace-ment therapy[J]. N Engl J Med,1991,325(17):1189-1195.
FORCIEA M A,MCLEAN R M,QASEEM A. Treatment of low bone density or osteoporosis to prevent fractures in men and women[J]. Ann Intern Med,2017,167(12):904.
LI F Z,ECKSTROM E,HARMER P,et al. Exercise and fall prevention:narrowing the research-to-practice gap and enhancing integration of clinical and community practice[J]. J Am Geriatr Soc,2016,64(2):425-431.
COSMAN F,DE BEUR S J,LEBOFF M S,et al. Clinician’s Guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis[J]. Osteoporos Int,2014,25(10):2359-2381.
KHAN A,FORTIER M,GROUP M A O W. RETIRED:osteoporosis in menopause[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can,2014,36(9):839-840.
CIANFEROTTI L,BRANDI M L. Guidance for the diagnosis,prevention and therapy of osteoporosis in Italy[J]. Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab,2012,9(3):170-178.
祁国明.卫生技术评估[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2000(1):3-4.
李幼平,喻佳洁,孙鑫.快速评估方法与流程的探索[J].中国循证医学杂志,2014,14(5):497-500.
HAILEY D. Toward transparency in health technology assessment:a checklist for HTA reports[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care,2003,19(1):1-7.
HUSEREAU D,DRUMMOND M,PETROU S,et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement[J]. J Med Econ,2013,16(6):713-719.
葛龙,潘蓓,潘佳雪,等.解读AMSTAR-2:基于随机和(或)非随机对照试验系统评价的质量评价工具[J].中国药物评价,2017,34(5):334-338.
BARRIONUEVO P,KAPOOR E,ASI N,et al. Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for the prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women:a network meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2019,104(5):1623-1630.
CARDONA J M,PASTOR E. Calcitonin versus etidronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis:a meta-analysis of published clinical trials[J]. Osteoporosis Int,1997,7(3):165-174.
CHEN J F,YANG K H,ZHANG Z L,et al. A systematic review on the use of daily subcutaneous administration of teriparatide for treatment of patients with osteoporosis at high risk for fracture in Asia[J]. Osteoporos Int,2015,26(1):11-28.
CHEN W C,LIN E Y,KANG Y N. Efficacy and safety of elcatonin in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis:a systematic review with network meta-analysis of rando- mized clinical trials[J]. Osteoporos Int,2019,30(9):1723-1732.
CRANNEY A,TUGWELL P,ADACHI J,et al. Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ⅲ. Meta-analysis of risedronate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. Endocr Rev,2002,23(4):517-523.
MANDEMA J W,ZHENG J,LIBANATI C,et al. Time course of bone mineral density changes with denosumab compared with other drugs in postmenopausal osteoporosis:a dose-response-based meta-analysis[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2014,99(10):3746-3755.
YANG L,KANG N,YANG J C,et al. Drug efficacies on bone mineral density and fracture rate for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis:a network meta-analysis[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci,2019,23(6):2640-2668.
陈长军.特立帕肽与鲑鱼降钙素治疗亚洲人群骨质疏松症的疗效对比:meta分析[D].济南:山东大学,2019.
崔凯,马爱霞.特立帕肽与降钙素治疗绝经后骨质疏松症疗效与安全性的Meta分析[J].中国药物评价,2016,33(2):101-105.
彭绩,周海滨,梁渊,等.绝经妇女骨质疏松治疗效果的Meta分析[J].医学与社会,2004,17(3):7-9,12.
阙敏强,石础硕,黄英杰,等.不同药物治疗原发性骨质疏松症的网状Meta分析[J].中国组织工程研究,2020,24(35):5715-5722.
邬红,杨拯,呙金海,等.鲑鱼降钙素联合基础药物治疗老年骨质疏松疗效的汇总分析[J].中国老年学杂志,2011,31(2):217-219.
COYLE D,CRANNEY A,LEE K M,et al. Cost effectiveness of nasal calcitonin in postmenopausal women:use of Cochrane Collaboration methods for meta-analysis within economic evaluation[J]. PharmacoEconomics,2001,19(5 Pt 2):565-575.
FRANCIS R M,ANDERSON F H,TORGERSON D J. A comparison of the effectiveness and cost of treatment for vertebral fractures in women[J]. Br J Rheumatol,1995,34(12):1167-1171.
KINGKAEW P,MALEEWONG U,NGARMUKOS C, et al. Evidence to inform decision makers in Thailand:a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening and treatment strategies for postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. Value Health,2012,15(1 Suppl):S20-S28.
范洪春.唑来膦酸注射液治疗老年骨质疏松症患者的药物经济学分析[J].中国药物经济学,2015,10(6):25-26.
李玉玲. 3种疗法治疗骨质疏松症的药物经济学分析[J].海峡药学,2013,25(3):278-279.
张新玉,魏丽.不同药物对绝经后骨质疏松疗效观察及生活质量和药物经济学评价[J].中国骨质疏松杂志,2011,17(6):517-522.
OKAMOTO H,SHIBAZAKI N,YOSHIMURA T,et al. Association between elcatonin use and cancer risk in Japan:a follow-up study after a randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled study of once-weekly elcatonin in primary postmenopausal osteoporosis[J]. Osteoporos Sarcopenia,2020,6(1):15-19.
0
浏览量
5
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构