浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.北京大学第三医院药学部,北京 100191
2.北京大学医学部药物评价中心,北京 100191
3.四川大学华西第二医院药学部,成都 610041
4.华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院药学部,武汉 430022
5.苏州大学附属第一医院药学部,江苏 苏州 215006
6.上海交通大学医学院附属第六人民医院骨质疏松和骨病专科,上海 200233
7.北京大学第三医院骨科,北京 100191
8.兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心,兰州 730000
硕士研究生。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:15739076937@163.com
教授,主任药师,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:循证药学、循证决策与管理。E-mail:zhanglingli@scu.edu.cn
教授,主任药师,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:循证药学、临床药物治疗评价、治疗药物监测和个体化治疗。E-mail:zhaorongsheng@bjmu.edu.cn
收稿日期:2024-11-08,
修回日期:2025-03-17,
录用日期:2025-03-17,
纸质出版日期:2025-05-15
移动端阅览
余玲玲,刘爽,宋再伟等.《骨质疏松症临床治疗生物制剂循证用药指南》推荐意见外审:一项横断面调查 Δ[J].中国药房,2025,36(09):1025-1029.
YU Lingling,LIU Shuang,SONG Zaiwei,et al.External review of the recommendations of the Guidelines for Evidence-based Use of Biological Agents for the Clinical Treatment of Osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(09):1025-1029.
余玲玲,刘爽,宋再伟等.《骨质疏松症临床治疗生物制剂循证用药指南》推荐意见外审:一项横断面调查 Δ[J].中国药房,2025,36(09):1025-1029. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.09.01.
YU Lingling,LIU Shuang,SONG Zaiwei,et al.External review of the recommendations of the Guidelines for Evidence-based Use of Biological Agents for the Clinical Treatment of Osteoporosis: a cross-sectional survey[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(09):1025-1029. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.09.01.
目的
2
对《骨质疏松症临床治疗生物制剂循证用药指南》(后文简称《指南》)的推荐意见进行科学性、明晰性和可行性的外部同行评估,以进一步修订和完善《指南》推荐意见。
方法
2
本研究采用横断面调查研究设计,通过方便抽样的方法选取骨质疏松症治疗领域一线医务工作者(临床医生、临床药师、护师)及患者或患者家属,并通过封闭式和开放式相结合的问卷调查方式开展外审工作,征求其对《指南》的32条推荐意见初稿的赞同程度、表达清晰程度和可行程度3个方面的反馈。
结果
2
本研究共收集到来自15家医院的90名外审对象的意见反馈,包括45名临床医生、15名临床药师、15名护师和15名患者或患者家属。推荐意见获得了高度认可,总体赞同程度达99.38%,总体表述清晰程度达98.92%,总体可行程度达99.65%。同时,收集到111条主观建议,为《指南》推荐意见的进一步完善提供了重要参考。基于上述反馈,《指南》指导委员会和核心专家组针对其中12条推荐意见初稿修订了表述,未进行删减,最终确定了32条推荐意见。
结论
2
本次外审为《指南》定稿提供了依据,进一步完善了推荐意见的科学性、明晰性和可行性,有利于提高《指南》的规范性、临床适用性与可实施性。
OBJECTIVE
2
To assess the scientific rigor, clarity and feasibility of the recommendations of the
Guidelines for Evidence-based Use of Biological Agents for the Clinical Treatment of Osteoporosis
(hereinafter referred to as the
Guideline
) through external review, in order to further revise and improve the
Guideline
recommendations.
METHODS
2
This study employed a cross-sectional survey research design, a convenience sampling method was adopted to select frontline medical workers in the field of osteoporosis (including clinical doctors, clinical pharmacists, and nurses) as well as patients or their family members. External review was conducted through a combination of closed-ended and open-ended electronic questionnaires to get feedback from them on the appreciation,clarity and feasibility of the 32 preliminary recommendations in the
Guideline
.
RESULTS
2
A total of 90 external review subjects from 15 hospitals were collected, including 45 clinical doctors, 15 clinical pharmacists, 15 nurses and 15 patients or their family members. The overall appreciation degree of recommendations was 99.38%, the overall clarity degree of recommendations was 98.92%, and the overall feasibility degree of recommendations was 99.65%. At the same time, 111 subj
ective suggestions were collected, which provided an important reference for the further improvement of the
Guideline
recommendations. Based on the above feedback, the
Guideline
steering committee and core expert group revised the wording of 12 draft recommendations without deletion, and finally determined 32 recommendations.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The external review provides an important basis for the final formation of the
Guideline
, further improves the scientific rigor, clarity and feasibility of the recommendations, and ensures the standardization, practicality and implementability of the
Guideline
.
Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Standards for Developing Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines . Clinical practice guidelines we can trust [M ] . Washington (DC) : National Academies Press (US) , 2011 : 131 - 138 .
KANIS J A , COOPER C , RIZZOLI R , et al . European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [J ] . Osteoporos Int , 2019 , 30 ( 1 ): 3 - 44 .
WANG L H , YU W , YIN X J , et al . Prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture in China:the China osteoporosis prevalence study [J ] . JAMA Netw Open , 2021 , 4 ( 8 ): e2121106 .
ARCEO-MENDOZA R M , CAMACHO P M . Postmenopausal osteoporosis:latest guidelines [J ] . Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am , 2021 , 50 ( 2 ): 167 - 178 .
CAMACHO P M , PETAK S M , BINKLEY N , et al . American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology Clinical Practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis:2020 update [J ] . Endocr Pract , 2020 , 26 ( Suppl. 1 ): 1 - 46 .
中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会 . 原发性骨质疏松症诊疗指南:2022 [J ] . 中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志 , 2022 , 15 ( 6 ): 573 - 611 .
国家卫生健康委员会医政司 . 老年髋部骨折诊疗与管理指南:2022年版 [J ] . 骨科临床与研究杂志 , 2023 , 8 ( 2 ): 77 - 83 .
李宁 , 李新萍 , 杨明辉 , 等 . 老年髋部骨折的骨质疏松症诊疗专家共识 [J ] . 中华骨与关节外科杂志 , 2021 , 14 ( 8 ): 657 - 663 .
中华医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会 . 骨质疏松性椎体压缩性骨折诊疗与管理专家共识 [J ] . 中华骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病杂志 , 2018 , 11 ( 5 ): 425 - 437 .
World Health Organization . WHO handbook for guideline development [M ] . 2nd ed . Switzeland : WHO Press , 2014 : 152 - 153 .
The Guidelines Manual . London (UK):national institute for health and clinical excellence:2012 [EB/OL ] .( 2012-11-03 )[ 2024-09-11 ] . https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg6/resources/the-guidelines-manual-pdf-2007970804933 https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg6/resources/the-guidelines-manual-pdf-2007970804933 .
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network . SIGN 50:a guideline developer ’s handbook [EB/OL ] . ( 2019-11-30 )[ 2024-09-11 ] . https://www.sign.ac.uk/our-guidelines/sign-50-a-guideline-developers-handbook/ https://www.sign.ac.uk/our-guidelines/sign-50-a-guideline-developers-handbook/ .
SCHÜNEMANN H J , WIERCIOCH W , ETXEANDIA I , et al . Guidelines 2.0:systematic development of a comprehensive checklist for a successful guideline enterprise [J ] . CMAJ , 2014 , 186 ( 3 ): E123 - E142 .
CHEN Y L , YAO L , XIAO X J , et al . Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China:1993-2010 [J ] . Chin Med J (Engl) , 2012 , 125 ( 20 ): 3660 - 3664 .
韦当 , 王小琴 , 吴琼芳 , 等 . 2011年中国临床实践指南质量评价 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2013 , 13 ( 6 ): 760 - 763 .
李楠 , 姚亮 , 吴琼芳 , 等 . 2012-2013年中国大陆期刊发表临床实践指南质量评价 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2015 , 15 ( 3 ): 259 - 263 .
陈恳 , 王琪 , 陈耀龙 , 等 . 《中国万古霉素治疗药物监测指南》推荐意见的外审调查 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2015 , 15 ( 6 ): 719 - 722 .
陈恳 , 宋再伟 , 刘维 , 等 . 《中国伏立康唑个体化用药指南》推荐意见的外审 [J ] . 药物流行病学杂志 , 2017 , 26 ( 2 ): 143 - 148 .
周鹏翔 , 陈逸 , 徐保平 , 等 . 《儿科阿奇霉素注射使用的快速建议指南》推荐意见的外审调查 [J ] . 中国医院药学杂志 , 2018 , 38 ( 17 ): 1773 - 1776 .
李正翔 , 段蓉 . 《医疗机构药品遴选指南》推荐意见的外审调查 [J ] . 中国医院用药评价与分析 , 2022 , 22 ( 8 ): 897 - 899,903 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构