Efficacy and Safety of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Preventive Treatment of Migraine:A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-06-21
|
Efficacy and Safety of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Preventive Treatment of Migraine:A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
China PharmacyVol. 31, Issue 18, (2020)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2020,
扫 描 看 全 文
LIU Xin, ZHONG Xiaoyan, LI Mengya, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Preventive Treatment of Migraine:A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. [J]. China Pharmacy 31(18).(2020)
DOI:
LIU Xin, ZHONG Xiaoyan, LI Mengya, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Preventive Treatment of Migraine:A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis. [J]. China Pharmacy 31(18).(2020)DOI:
Efficacy and Safety of Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies in the Preventive Treatment of Migraine:A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE:To systematically evaluate th e efficacy and safety of 4 kinds of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP)monoclonal antibodies in the preventive treatment of migraine ,and to provide evidence-based reference for the clinical treatment of migraine. METHODS :Retrieved from the Cochrane Library ,PubMed,Embase,CJFD,VIP and Wanfang database , RCTs about 4 kinds of CGRP monoclonal antibodies (trial Δ 基金项目 :四川省科技厅重点研发 (重大科技专项 )项目 group) versus placebo (control group ) in the preventive (No.2019YFS0180) *硕士研究生 。研究方向 :临床药学 、循证药学 。电话:0830- treatment of migraine were collected. After literature screening 3165787。E-mail:lewxinn@outlook.com and data extraction , the quality evaluation of included # 通信作者:教授,硕士生导师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学、循证 literature was performed by using the bias risk assessment tool 药学。电话:0830-3165787。E-mail:hyl3160131@163.com provided by the Cochrane system evaluator manual 5.1.0. 中国药房 2020年第31卷第18期 China Pharmacy 2020Vol. 31 No. 18 ·2275· Bayesian network Meta-analysis was performed by using GeMTC 0.14.3 software and Stata 16.0 software. RESULTS :A total of 19 RCTs involving 11 392 patients were included ,involving 10 interventions,such as Erenumab 70,140 mg/month;Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months,225 mg/month;Galcanezumab 120,240,300 mg/month;Eptinezumab 100 mg/3 months,300 mg/3 months and placebo. Results of Meta-analysis showed that compared with control group ,4 kinds of CGRP monoclonal antibodies significantly reduced the change of mean monthly migraine days (MMD)(P<0.05). Among trial groups ,compared with Galcanezumab 300 mg/month [MD =-1.30,95%CI(-2.59,-0.05),P<0.05] and Eptinezumab 100 mg/3 months [MD =-1.18, 95%CI(-2.26,-0.03),P<0.05],Fremanezumab 225 mg/month could significantly reduce MMD. Network Meta-analysis ranking showed that Fremanezumab 225 mg/month>Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months>Galcanezumab 120 mg/month>Erenumab 140 mg/month>Galcanezumab 240 mg/month>Eptinezumab 300 mg/3 months>Erenumab 70 mg/month>Eptinezumab 100 mg/3 months>Galcanezumab 300 mg/month>placebo. Compared with control group ,4 kinds of CGRP monoclonal antibodies were significantly increased of the proportion of patients whose mean monthly migraine days reduction ≥50% compared with baseline (MMD 50)(P<0.05). Among trial groups ,compared with Eptinezumab 100 mg/3 months group ,MMD 50 of Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months group [OR =1.51,95%CI(1.02,2.31),P<0.05],Fremanezumab 225 mg/month group [OR =1.58,95%CI (1.05,2.44),P<0.05] were increased significantly. Network Meta-analysis ranking showed that Fremanezumab 225 mg/month> Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months>Erenumab 140 mg/month>Galcanezumab 120 mg/month>Eptinezumab 300 mg/3 months> Galcanezumab 240 mg/month>Erenumab 70 mg/month>Galcanezumab 300 mg/month>Eptinezumab 100 mg/3 months>placebo. In terms of safety ,incidence of total adverse events (AE)of trial groups receiving Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months [OR =1.31, 95%CI(1.05,1.64),P<0.05],Galcanezumab 240 mg/month [OR =1.39,95%CI(1.09,1.74),P<0.05] were significantly higher than control group. Among trial groups ,compared with Galcanezumab 240 mg/month group ,AE of Erenumab 70 mg/month group [OR =0.67,95%CI(0.50,0.93),P<0.05],Erenumab 140 mg/month group [OR =0.70,95%CI(0.51,0.98),P<0.05] were decreased significantly. Compared with Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months group ,AE of Erenumab 70 mg/month group [OR = 0.72,95%CI(0.52,0.98),P<0.05] were decreased significantly. Network Meta-analysis ranking showed that Galcanezumab 240 mg/month> Fremanezumab 675 mg/3 months>Galcanezumab 120 mg/month>Galcanezumab 300 mg/month>Eptinezumab 300 mg/3 months>Fremanezumab 225 mg/month>Eptinezumab 100 mg/3 months>placebo>Erenumab 140 mg/month>Erenumab 70 mg/month. CONCLUSIONS :Four kinds of CGRP monoclonal antibodies are effective in the preventive treatment of migraine , among which Fremanezumab 225 mg/month is most likely to have the best efficacy and Erenumab 70 mg/month is most likely to have the highest safety.
Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Chinese Patent Medicine Compound Preparation Combined with Conventional Therapy for Psoriasis Vulgaris
复方苦参注射液联合拉米夫定治疗慢性乙型肝炎肝硬化的疗效观察
盐酸米诺环素软膏联合甲硝唑药膜治疗牙周病的临床观察
乳果糖与白醋稀释液灌肠辅助治疗早期肝昏迷的疗效观察
氯地松乳膏治疗皮炎湿疹类皮肤病的临床疗效评价
Related Author
LIN Li
YAN Xiaoning
LI Wenbin
ZHAO Yiding
陈刚 毛杰 焦作义 李玉民
张艽 李纲 杨颖 王莉 朱帝翠 钟菲
肖政 尹雄章
季蔚青 李惠仙
Related Institution
Dept. of General Medicine, Hengshui Municipal People’s Hospital
College of Clinical Medicine, Hebei Medical University
Dept. of Rheumatology and Immunology, Hengshui Municipal People’s Hospital
First Ward, Dept. of Neurology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
Dept. of Intensive Care Medicine, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University