OBJECTIVE：To e valuate the clinical efficacy and economics of Sodium tanshinone Ⅱ A sulfonate injection combined with conventional medication versus conventional medication in the treatment of angina pectoris of coronary heart disease. METHODS ：Using“Sodium tanshinone Ⅱ A sulfonate”“Danshentong”“angina pectoris ”as Chinese key words and “Sodium tanshinone Ⅱ A sulfonate”“Danshentong”“Angina pectoris ”as English keywords ，the studies were retrieved from Wanfang database ，CNKI，CBM，Cochrane Library ，Medline，Embase，ISI Web of Science and BIOSIS Previews during the inception to Apr. 2019. After literature screening and data extraction ，the included real world cohort studies were evaluated with bias risk tool of Cochrane systematic evaluator manual 5.2.0. Meta-analysis was conducted by using Stata 15.0 software，and publication bias of results was analyzed . The cost-effectiveness analysis was used for pharmacoeconomic evaluate ，and single factor sensitivity analysis and probability sensitivity analysis were carried out for the results of pharmacoeconomic evaluation. RESULTS ： A total of 29 literatures were included ，involving 31 studies and 2 857 patients. Meta-analysis showed that clinical effective rate [RR ＝1.23，95％CI（1.18，1.28），P＜0.001]，ECG effective rate [RR ＝1.29，95％CI（1.20，1.39），P＜0.001] and angina pectoris effective rate [RR ＝1.22，95％CI（1.15，1.29），P＜0.001] of trial group were significantly higher than those of control group. The adverse reactions of the two groups were mild. The above results were likely to be biased in publication. Cost-effectiveness analysis showed that ICER was 72.02 of 2 groups. The sensitivity analysis showed that above results were stable. CONCLUSIONS ： For patients with angina pectoris of coronary heart disease ，therapeutic efficacy of Sodium tanshinone ⅡA sulfonate injection combined with conventional medication is better that of conventional medication ，and the cost is also slightly higher. When the willingness to pay is higher than 7 202 yuan，the combination scheme has the advantage of cost-effectiveness.