Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-11-09
|
Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
China PharmacyVol. 33, Issue 14, (2022)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
DU Guiping, GAO Shengnan, QI Ran, et al. Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. [J]. China Pharmacy 33(14).(2022)
DOI:
DU Guiping, GAO Shengnan, QI Ran, et al. Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. [J]. China Pharmacy 33(14).(2022)DOI:
Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab and zoledronic acid in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis ,and to provide reference for relevant decision-making. METHODS From the perspective of Chinese health system ,Excel 2003 software was used to establish Markov model ,and cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab or zoledronic acid combined with calcium carbonate D 3 in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Pharmacotherapy effects were obtained from the network Meta-analysis ,and cost and health-utility value data were obtained from the published literature or network ,etc. The model cycle was 1 year,and the simulation time limit was the patient ’s lifetime. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to evaluate the impact of model parameter changes on the robustness of the results ;and the cost-effectiveness of changing the medication cycle of zoledronic acid were explored through scenario analysis. RESULTS Denosumab regimen was more effective than zoledronic acid regimen (12.77 QALYs vs. 11.98 QALYs),and its cost was also higher than zoledronic acid regimen (51 224.56 yuan vs. 49 221.67 yuan), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was 2 544.14 yuan/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis showed that the cost of Zoledronic acid injection and that of Denosumab injection had great impact on the results. The results of probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that when using 3 times of per capita gross domestic product (GDP)in China in 2021 as the threshold of willingness to pay ,the probability of Denosumab regimen being cost-effective was 85.4%. The results of the scenario analysis showed that the Denosumab regimen was still more cost-effective when the dosing cycle of zoledronic acid was changed. CONCLUSIONS Under the threshold of 1-3 times of Chinese per capita GDP in 2021,denosumab combined with calcium carbonate D 3 is more cost-effective than zoledronic acid combined with calcium carbonate D 3 in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Cost-utility analysis of dorzagliatin combined with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with poor glycemic control with metformin
Cost-utility analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in the second-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke
Cost-utility analysis of tislelizumab monotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Introduction of measurement methods of health utility for cancer patients
Related Author
LIU Guoqiang
NIU Mengna
GUO Shan
GAO Shengnan
FENG Bing
GAO Ning
WU Yanan
WU Fang
Related Institution
Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Hebei Society for Integrated Drug and Health Technology Assessment
School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University
Dept. of Pharmacy, Huangpu Branch, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Dept. of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine