Cost-utility analysis of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
返回论文页
|更新时间:2022-11-09
|
Cost-utility analysis of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
China PharmacyVol. 33, Issue 15, (2022)
作者机构:
作者简介:
基金信息:
DOI:
CLC:
Published:2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
GAO Hongting, HU Mengxue, JIA Linlin, et al. Cost-utility analysis of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. [J]. China Pharmacy 33(15).(2022)
DOI:
GAO Hongting, HU Mengxue, JIA Linlin, et al. Cost-utility analysis of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer. [J]. China Pharmacy 33(15).(2022)DOI:
Cost-utility analysis of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer
OBJECTIVE From the perspective o f China ’s h ealth service system ,to ev aluate the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC),so as to provide reference for the selection of clinical medication plan and medical and health decision-making. METHODS Based on the ORIENT-11 study data ,a partitioned survival model was established ,and the model period was 21 days to simulate the death of 99% of the patients. Using quality-adjusted life years (QALY)as an output indicator ,the cost-effectiveness of sintilimab combined with chemotherapy (trial group )versus chemotherapy alone (control group )in the first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent NSCLC was evaluated. Cost and utility were discounted using 5% discount rate ;sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis were used to verify the robustness of the underlying analysis results. RESULTS Under the premise that 3 times of the per capita gross domestic product (GDP)of China in 2020 was used as the threshold of willingness-to-pay (WTP),the patients in the trial group obtained more utility (0.482 QALY)and also spent nearly twice as much as the control group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER)was 334 974.41 yuan/QALY. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that progression-free survival status utility value , pemetrexed price ,utility discount rate ,cost discount rate and sintilimab price had a greater impact on ICER. The results of probability sensitivity analysis showed that when the WTP threshold was 3 times of China ’s per capita GDP in 2020,the probability of the trial group ’s plan being cost-effective was 6.5%. The results of the scenario analysis verified the robustness of the underlying analysis results. CONCLUSIONS On the premise of taking 3 times of China ’s per capita GDP in 2020 as the WTP threshold , sintilimab combined with chemotherapy is not cost-effective for first-line treatment of advanced or recurrent NSCLC compared with chemotherapy alone.