OBJECTIVE： To provide reference for rational use of TCM injection. METHODS： Each 660 medical records were  selected from 9 hospitals of Luzhou city before （Jan.-Mar. in 2015） and after （Jan.-Mar. in 2017） administrative intervention and pharmaceutical intervention （called “intervention” for short） according to random number tablet. The consumption sum， DDDs and B/A， utilization， per capita， cost of drug and TCM injection， rational and irrational use were compared before and after intervention.  RESULTS： After intervention， total consumption sum and DDDs of 10 TCM injections were decreased in 7 hospitals compared to before intervention， but those of 2 hospitals were increased slightly. Before and after intervention， consumption sum of Xueshuangtong for injection took up the first place among 10 kinds of TCM injection. Top 5 injections in the list of DDDs were the same generally， i.e. Xuesaitong for injection， Xueshuangtong for injection， Shenmai injection， Salviae miltiorrhizae and ligustrazine hydrochloride injection and Safflower yellow for injection. 10 kinds of TCM injections with B/A＞1 included Xuesaitong for injection， Salviae miltiorrhizae and ligustrazine hydrochloride injection， Safflower yellow for injection and Gastrodin injection.  After intervention， utilization rate of 10 TCM injections （24.70％） was significantly lower than before intervention （32.42％）， rational rate of TCM injection （61.35％） was significantly higher than before intervention （41.59％）， with statistical significance （P＜0.01）.  After intervention， the per capita  cost of TCM injection， the incidence of function inconsistency， excessive dose， irrational solvent selection， insufficient solvent amount and non-individual injection were significantly lower than before intervention， with statistical significance （P＜0.05）. There was no statistical significance in per capita cost of drug， the irrational utilization rate of repeated medication or excessive long treatment course before and after intervention （P＞0.05）. CONCLUSIONS： The administrative intervention combined with pharmaceutical intervention promote more safe， rational and economical use of TCM injection.