OBJECTIVE： To investigate the overall quality of ADR report in our hospital， in order to further improve the quality of ADR report， promote the hospital ADR monitoring and provide data support.  METHODS： ADR reports were collected from our hospital during Jan. 2011- Dec. 2015， and were analyzed statistically in respects of report type， ADR reports during monitoring period （new drugs） and outside monitoring period （previous drugs）， reporter’s occupation， departments， ADR clinical manifestations and original report missing item， etc. RESULTS： A total of 2 295 cases of ADR were collected， the number of known general ADR reports were the most， being 1 943 cases （84.66％）， but there were 20 cases of new severe ADR （0.87％）； 2 136 ADR cases were induced by previous drugs （93.07％）. Most of reporters were nurse， including 1 999 cases in total （87.10％）， and physicians and pharmacists accounted for 7.28％ and 5.62％， respectively. More of reports were from outpatient injection room， including 1 473 cases in total （64.18％）， and surgical and non-surgical departments accounted for 15.08％ and 15.16％， respectively. ADR clinical manifestations were mainly common symptoms， involved in 1 938 cases （97.48％）； only 2.52％ were rare symptoms. The original report missing items mainly included relevant important information， the description of the ADR process and correlation evaluation， accounting for 81.92％， 69.19％ and 57.08％. CONCLUSIONS： On the whole， the quality of ADR reports in our hospital are poor. It is necessary to change the current ADR monitoring mode of pharmacists， check and propaganda ADR reports in the clinic， improve the quality of ADR reports and establish long-term mechanism of ADR reports.