Application status of SWARA method in clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs

WEN Yalin; SHI Xia; LONG Enwu; TONG Rongsheng; WU Xingwei

doi:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.19.25

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Application status of SWARA method in clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs

更新时间：2025-12-03

- Application status of SWARA method in clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs
- ZHONGGUO YAOFANG Vol. 33, Issue 19, Pages: 2428-2432(2022)
- 作者机构：
  
  1.四川省医学科学院·四川省人民医院药学部，成都　610072
  2.电子科技大学医学院·个体化药物治疗四川省重点实验室，成都　610072
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.19.25
  CLC： R95;R-1
- Received：30 March 2022，
  
  Revised：2022-08-24，
  
  Published：15 October 2022
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
温亚林,石霞,龙恩武,等.SWARA方法在药品临床综合评价中的应用现状 [J].中国药房,2022,33(19):2428-2432.

WEN Yalin,SHI Xia,LONG Enwu,et al.Application status of SWARA method in clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(19):2428-2432.
温亚林,石霞,龙恩武,等.SWARA方法在药品临床综合评价中的应用现状 [J].中国药房,2022,33(19):2428-2432. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.19.25.

WEN Yalin,SHI Xia,LONG Enwu,et al.Application status of SWARA method in clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(19):2428-2432. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.19.25.

摘要

药品临床综合评价是药品供应保障决策的重要技术工具，其要求评价主体采用多种评价方法和工具对药品开展多维度、多层次证据的综合评判。多准则决策分析（MCDA）是药品临床综合评价的重要方法，包括权重赋值和综合评价。逐步加权评估比率分析法（SWARA）是MCDA的一种权重赋值方法，较其他方法可更简洁、准确地确定指标权重。本文对SWARA的方法进行介绍，并系统综述了SWARA在药品临床综合评价中的应用现状。结果显示，目前，SWARA已应用于多个研究领域。在医药学领域内，研究者利用SWARA建立MCDA模型，通过咨询专家团队意见，计算出每个药物评价准则的具体权重值。SWARA的优势在于其按照相应步骤，通过征询专家意见或判断，为药物评价准则的权重提供了一个全新的赋值方式，以解决医疗领域中的MCDA问题；但其在解决复杂决策问题时具有一定的主观性和不确定性，也可能存在评价准则筛选不充分、覆盖主题不全面等问题，应用时需加以注意。

Abstract

Clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs is an important technical tool for drug supply assurance decision-making， which requires evaluation subjects to use multiple evaluation methods and tools to carry out a comprehensive evaluation of multi-dimensional and multi-level evidence　for drugs. Multi-criteria decision analysis （MCDA） is an important method for clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs， including weight assignment and comprehensive evaluation. Step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis （SWARA） is a weighting method for MCDA， which can determine indicator weight concisely and accurately compared to other methods. This paper introduces the method of SWARA， and systematically reviews the application of SWARA in the comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs. Currently， the SWARA method is used in various research areas. Within the field of pharmaceuticals， researchers use the SWARA method to build MCDA models and calculate specific weight values for each drug evaluation criterion by consulting a team of experts. The advantage of SWARA is that it provides a brand-new way of assigning the weight of drug evaluation criterion by consulting experts’ opinions or judgments according to corresponding steps to solve the MCDA problem in the medical field； however， it has certain subjectivity and uncertainty in solving complex decision-making problems， and there may also be problems such as insufficient screening of evaluation criterion and incomplete coverage of topics， which should be paid attention to in application.

关键词

Keywords

references

国家卫生健康委 . 国家卫生健康委关于开展药品使用监测和临床综合评价工作的通知：国卫药政函〔2019〕 80 号[EB/OL ] .（ 2019-04-09 ）[ 2021-08-18 ] . http：//www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/pqt/201904/31149bb1845e4c019a04f30c0d69c2c9.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/pqt/201904/31149bb1845e4c019a04f30c0d69c2c9.shtml .

董名扬，王舒，菅凌燕 . 药品临床综合评价方法的应用现状 [J ] . 中国药房， 2021 ， 32 （ 22 ）： 2813 - 2816 .

石秀园，赵锐，李璠，等 . 构建我国药品临床综合评价工作机制的思考 [J ] . 中国药房， 2020 ， 31 （ 23 ）： 2828 - 2833 .

CHISHOLM O ， SHARRY P ， PHILLIPS L . Multi-criteria decision analysis for benefit-risk analysis by national regulatory authorities [J ] . Front Med （Lausanne）， 2021 ， 8 ： 820335 .

REHMAN S ， REHMAN N ， NAZ M ， et al . Application of grey-based SWARA and COPRAS techniques in disease mortality risk assessment [J ] . J Healthc Eng ， 2021 ， 2021 ： 7302157 .

TURSKIS Z . Multi-attribute contractors ranking method by applying ordering of feasible alternatives of solutions in terms of preferability technique [J ] . Ukio Technol Ir Ekon Vystymas ， 2008 ， 14 （ 2 ）： 224 - 239 .

ZOLFANI S H ， ZAVADSKAS E K . Sustainable development of rural areas’ building structures based on local climate [J ] . Procedia Eng ， 2013 ， 57 ： 1295 - 1301 .

MARDANI A ， JUSOH A ， ZAVADSKAS E K ， et al . Proposing a new hierarchical framework for the evaluation of quality management practices：a new combined fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach [J ] . J Bus Econ Manag ， 2016 ， 17 （ 1 ）： 1 - 16 .

BORDBAR M ， AGHAMOHAMMADI H ， POURGHASEMI H R ， et al . Multi-hazard spatial modeling via ensembles of machine learning and meta-heuristic techniques [J ] . Sci Rep ， 2022 ， 12 （ 1 ）： 1451 .

CINELLI M ， SPADA M ， KIM W ， et al . MCDA index tool：an interactive software to develop indices and ran- kings [J ] . Environ Syst Decis ， 2021 ， 41 （ 1 ）： 82 - 109 .

NICKLIN D ， GOHARI DARABKHANI H . Techniques to measure particulate matter emissions from stationary sources：a critical technology review using multi criteria decision analysis （MCDA） [J ] . J Environ Manage ， 2021 ， 296 ： 113167 .

WONDER M ， DUNLOP S . Assessment of the quality of the clinical evidence in submissions to the Australian pharmaceutical benefits advisory committee：fit for purpose? [J ] . Value Health ， 2015 ， 18 （ 4 ）： 467 - 476 .

RAWLINS M D ， CULYER A J . National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments [J ] . BMJ ， 2004 ， 329 （ 7459 ）： 224 - 227 .

YOUNGKONG S ， BALTUSSEN R ， TANTIVESS S ， et al . Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit pa- ckage in Thailand [J ] . Value Health ， 2012 ， 15 （ 6 ）： 961 - 970 .

THOKALA P ， DEVLIN N ， MARSH K ， et al . Multiple criteria decision analysis for health care decision making：an introduction：report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA emerging good practices task force [J ] . Value Health ， 2016 ， 19 （ 1 ）： 1 - 13 .

MACCRIMMON K R . Decision making among multiple-attribute alternatives：a survey and consolidated approach [M ] . Santa Monica ： The RAND Corporation ， 1968 ： 13 - 15 .

GENG X L ， QIU H Q . Group decision-making method of design concept based on hesitant fuzzy PROMETHEE Ⅱ [J ] . Application Research of Computers ， 2018 ， 35 （ 10 ）： 3020 - 3024 .

SAATY R W . Decision-making in complex environments：the analytic hierarchy process （AHP） for decision-making and the analytic network process （ANP） for decision-making with dependence and feedback [EB/OL ] . [ 2022-02-30 ] . http：//www.rwspublications.com/app/download/561- 417304/Tutorial2003.pdf http://www.rwspublications.com/app/download/561-417304/Tutorial2003.pdf .

MAKAN A ， FADILI A . Sustainability assessment of healthcare waste treatment systems using surrogate weights and PROMETHEE method [J ] . Waste Manag Res ， 2021 ， 39 （ 1 ）： 73 - 82 .

HWANG C L ， KP Y . Multiple attribute decision making . Methods and applications. A state-of-the-art survey[EB/OL ] .[ 2022-02-10 ] https：//link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9 .

FORESTAL R L ， PI S M . A hybrid approach based on ELECTRE Ⅲ-genetic algorithm and TOPSIS method for selection of optimal COVID-19 vaccines [J ] . J Multi Criteria Decis Anal ， 2022 ， 29 （ 1/2 ）： 80 - 91 .

ZOLFANI S ， ŠAPARAUSKAS J . New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system [J ] . Eng Econ ， 2014 ， 24 ： 408 - 414 .

KAZANCOGLU Y ， OZBILTEKIN-PALA M ， SEZER M D ， et al . Circular dairy supply chain management through internet of things-enabled technologies [J ] . Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ， 2022 .

EGHBALI-ZARCH M ， TAVAKKOLI-MOGHADDAM R ， ESFAHANIAN F ， et al . Pharmacological therapy selection of type 2 diabetes based on the SWARA and modified MULTIMOORA methods under a fuzzy environment [J ] . Artif Intell Med ， 2018 ， 87 ： 20 - 33 .

WEN Z ， LIAO H C ， REN R X ， et al . Cold chain logistics management of medicine with an integrated multi-criteria decision-making method [J ] . Int J Environ Res Public Health ， 2019 ， 16 （ 23 ）： 4843 .

JAFARZADEH S ， DOROSTI S ， AB RAHMAN M N ， et al . Theory-based failure modes and effect analysis for medication errors [J ] . J Healthc Eng ， 2021 ， 2021 ： 5533208 .

IGHRAVWE D E ， OKE S A . An integrated approach of SWARA and fuzzy COPRAS for maintenance technicians’ selection factors ranking [J ] . Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag ， 2019 ， 10 （ 6 ）： 1615 - 1626 .

BALKI M K ， ERDOĞAN S ， AYDIN S ， et al . The optimization of engine operating parameters via SWARA and ARAS hybrid method in a small SI engine using alternative fuels [J ] . J Clean Prod ， 2020 ， 258 ： 120685 .

MARDANI A ， NILASHI M ， ZAKUAN N ， et al . A syste- matic review and meta-analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods：theory and applications with recent fuzzy deve- lopments [J ] . Appl Soft Comput ， 2017 ， 57 ： 265 - 292 .

GHORSHI NEZHAD M R ， ZOLFANI S H ， MOZTARZADEH F ， et al . Planning the priority of high tech industries based on SWARA-WASPAS methodology：the case of the nanotechnology industry in Iran [J ] . Econ Res Ekon Istraživanja ， 2015 ， 28 （ 1 ）： 1111 - 1137 .

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

Address：8th Floor, Sihuan Building, No. 129 Daping Main Street, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China Postal code：400042
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder Electronics co., LTD 渝ICP备15012710号公网安备50010302001817
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰