DU Guiping,LI Yukun,LI Min,et al.Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and teriparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(02):173-178.
DU Guiping,LI Yukun,LI Min,et al.Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and teriparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(02):173-178. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.02.09.
Cost-utility analysis of denosumab and teriparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab and teriparatide in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women, and provide reference for relevant decision-making.
METHODS
2
From the perspective of health system in China, Excel 2003 was used to establish Markov model, and cost-utility analysis was used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab or teriparatide combined with Calcium carbonate D
3
tablets in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women. Pharmacotherapy effects were obtained with network meta-analysis, and cost and health utility value data were obtained from published literature. The model cycle was 1 year, and the simulation time limit was the patient’s lifetime. Univariate sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were used to evaluate the effects of model parameter changes on the robustness of the results. Through scenario analysis, the cost-effectiveness of domestic drug cost used as drug cost of terlipatide group was discussed; the influence of residual effects of teriparatide on the results and the cost-effectiveness of sequential use of desumamab after terlipatide withdrawal were also discussed.
RESULTS
2
The effect of denosumab regimen was better than that of terlipatide regimen [13.24 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) vs. 12.96 QALYs], with lower cost (51 224.64 yuan vs. 167 102.67 yuan), denosumab regimen was the absolutely superior regimen. The results of single factor sensitivity analysis showed that the cost and discount rate of Terlipatide injection had greater impact on the results. The results of probability sensitivity analysis showed that when three times of China’s per capita gross domestic product (GDP) in 2021 was used as the threshold of willingness to pay, the probability of cost-effectiveness of denosumab regimen was 93.5%. The results of scenario analysis showed that, whether the drug cost of terlipatide regimen which was replaced by domestic drugs, or the residual effect of terlipatide was considered, or desulmonab was used sequentially after two years of terlipide treatment, denosumab regimen was always the absolute advantage regimen.
CONCLUSIONS
2
Denosumab combined with Calcium carbonate D
3
tablets is more cost-effective than teriparatide combined with Calcium carbonate D
3
tablets in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Chinese women.
SHOBACK D,ROSEN C J,BLACK D M,et al. Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women:an endocrine society guideline update[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab,2020,105(3):dgaa048.
SI L,WINZENBERG T M,JIANG Q,et al. Projection of osteoporosis-related fractures and costs in China:2010-2050[J]. Osteoporos Int,2015,26(7):1929-1937.
于龙,王亮. 老年骨质疏松症现状及进展[J]. 中国临床保健杂志,2022,25(1):6-11.
YOU R X,ZHANG Y,WU D B C,et al. Cost-effectiveness of zoledronic acid versus oral alendronate for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China[J]. Front Pharmacol,2020,11:456.
JOLETTE J,ATTALLA B,VARELA A,et al. Comparing the incidence of bone tumors in rats chronically exposed to the selective PTH type 1 receptor agonist abaloparatide or PTH(1-34)[J]. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol,2017,86:356-365.
CAMACHO P M,PETAK S M,BINKLEY N,et al. American association of clinical endocrinologists/American college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis:2020 update[J]. Endocr Pract,2020,26:1-46.
MORI T,CRANDALL C J,FUJII T,et al. Cost-effectiveness of sequential daily teriparatide/weekly alendronate compared with alendronate monotherapy for older osteoporotic women with prior vertebral fracture in Japan[J]. Arch Osteoporos,2021,16(1):72.
刘国恩. 中国药物经济学评价指南2020[M]. 北京:中国市场出版社,2020:27-46.
LI N,ZHENG B,LIU M B,et al. Cost-effectiveness of antiosteoporosis strategies for postmenopausal women with osteoporosis in China[J]. Menopause,2019,26(8):906-914.
DAVIS S,SIMPSON E,HAMILTON J,et al. Denosumab,raloxifene,romosozumab and teriparatide to prevent osteoporotic fragility fractures:a systematic review and economic evaluation[J]. Health Technol Assess,2020,24(29):1-314.
BOW C H,CHEUNG E,CHEUNG C L,et al. Ethnic difference of clinical vertebral fracture risk[J]. Osteoporos Int,2012,23(3):879-885.
MORI T,CRANDALL C J,GANZ D A. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus oral alendronate for elderly osteoporotic women in Japan[J]. Osteoporos Int,2017,28(5):1733-1744.
KLOTZBUECHER C M,ROSS P D,LANDSMAN P B,et al. Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures:a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis[J]. J Bone Miner Res,2000,15(4):721-739.
SI L,WINZENBERG T M,CHEN M,et al. Screening for osteoporosis in Chinese post-menopausal women:a health economic modelling study[J]. Osteoporos Int,2016,27(7):2259-2269.
SUN S,CHEN J Y,JOHANNESSON M,et al. Population health status in China:EQ-5D results,by age,sex and socio-economic status,from the National Health Services Survey 2008[J]. Qual Life Res,2011,20(3):309-320.
YOU R X,LIU J Y,KE L,et al. Cost-effectiveness of sequential teriparatide/zoledronic acid compared with zoledronic acid monotherapy for postmenopausal osteoporotic women in China[J]. Front Public Health,2022,10:794861.
SVEDBOM A,BORGSTÖM F,HERNLUND E,et al. Quality of life for up to 18 months after low-energy hip,vertebral,and distal forearm fractures:results from the ICUROS[J]. Osteoporos Int,2018,29(3):557-566.
LUO C X, QIN S Y, WANG Q,et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of five drugs for treating postmenopausal women in the United States with osteoporosis and a very high fracture risk[J]. J Endocrinol Invest,2022:1-13.
Cost-utility analysis of dorzagliatin combined with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with poor glycemic control with metformin
Cost-utility analysis of trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in the second-line treatment for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer
Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of clopidogrel versus aspirin for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke
Cost-utility analysis of tislelizumab monotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Introduction of measurement methods of health utility for cancer patients
Related Author
LIU Guoqiang
NIU Mengna
GUO Shan
GAO Shengnan
FENG Bing
GAO Ning
WU Yanan
WU Fang
Related Institution
Dept. of Clinical Pharmacy, Hebei Medical University Third Hospital
Hebei Society for Integrated Drug and Health Technology Assessment
School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University
Dept. of Pharmacy, Huangpu Branch, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine
Dept. of Pharmacy, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine