浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
苏州大学附属第二医院药学部,江苏 苏州 215006
Published:30 January 2023,
Received:19 May 2022,
Revised:26 December 2022,
扫 描 看 全 文
耿洲,王洋,屈昱晨等.15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物在我院PIVAS中的环境残留检测及清洁方法 Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(02):217-222.
GENG Zhou,WANG Yang,QU Yuchen,et al.Study on environmental residues detection and cleaning method of 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs in PIVAS of our hospital[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(02):217-222.
耿洲,王洋,屈昱晨等.15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物在我院PIVAS中的环境残留检测及清洁方法 Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(02):217-222. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.02.17.
GENG Zhou,WANG Yang,QU Yuchen,et al.Study on environmental residues detection and cleaning method of 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs in PIVAS of our hospital[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(02):217-222. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.02.17.
目的
2
为静脉用药集中调配中心(PIVAS)提供减少环境残留的方法,保障医护人员的职业健康。
方法
2
采用高效液相色谱-四极杆/静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱技术检测我院PIVAS环境中吉西他滨等15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物的残留量,并以残留量为指标优化清洁流程;采用氮吹法进行酒精挥发试验;采用CCK-8法检测含氯消毒液对细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物毒性的影响。
结果
2
吉西他滨等15种药物的线性范围为0.5~1 000 ng/mL;日内、日间精密度的RSD均不高于20.00%。我院PIVAS环境中检测到吉西他滨、异环磷酰胺、环磷酰胺等6种药物,以环磷酰胺的残留量较高。最优清洁程序为清水清洁1次+1 000 mg/L含氯消毒液清洁1次+75%酒精清洁1次后,用干纱布擦拭。酒精挥发试验结果显示,对照组与75%酒精组各药物的残留量比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。CCK-8实验结果显示,与对照组比较,15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物组细胞生存率显著下降(
P
<0.01),15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物+含氯消毒液组细胞生存率显著高于15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物组(
P
<0.01)。
结论
2
成功建立了同时测定PIVAS环境中吉西他滨等15种细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物残留的方法;最优清洁程序能降低细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物的残留量,含氯消毒液能降低其毒性,且残留药物不会随酒精挥发而造成操作区域的二次污染。
OBJECTIVE
2
To provide a method to reduce environmental residues for pharmacy intravenous admixture service (PIVAS), and ensure the occupational health of medical staff.
METHODS
2
The residues of 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs such as gemcitabine were detected by UPLC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS. The cleaning process was optimized with the residual quantity as the index. Nitrogen blowing method was used for alcohol volatilization experiment. CCK-8 assay was used to detect the effect of chlorine-containing disinfectant on the toxicity of cytotoxic antitumor drugs.
RESULTS
2
The linear range of 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs such as gemcitabine were 0.5-1 000 ng/mL. RSDs of intra-day and intra-day precision were no higher than 20.00%. Six drugs including gemcitabine, isocyclophosphamide and cyclophosphamide were detected in the PIVAS environment of our hospital, and the residue of cyclophosphamide was relatively high. The optimal cleaning procedure was cleaning once with water + cleaning once with 1 000 mg/L chlorine-containing disinfectant + cleaning once with 75% alcohol, wiping with dry gauze method. The results of alcohol volatilization test showed that there was no significant difference in drug residues between control group and 75% alcohol group (
P
>0.05). The results of CCK-8 test showed that compared with control group, the survival rates of the cells treated with 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs were decreased significantly (
P
<0.01); the survival rates of the cells treated with 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs+chlorine-containing disinfectant were significantly higher than those treated with 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs (
P
<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
2
A method for the simultaneous determination for residues of 15 cytotoxic antineoplastic drugs such as gemcitabine in PIVAS is successfully established; the optimal cleaning procedure can significantly reduce the residues of drugs, the use of chlorine-containing disinfectant can significantly reduce the toxicity of drug, and the residual drugs will not cause secondary contamination of the operating area with alcohol volatilization.
静脉用药集中调配中心高效液相色谱-四极杆/静电场轨道阱高分辨质谱技术细胞毒性抗肿瘤药物环境残留检测环境残留清洁
UPLC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMScytotoxic antineoplastic drugsenvironmental residues detectionenvironmental residues clean
RITCHIE M A,MCADAMS C,FRITZ N. Exposure risk in the handling and administration of chemotherapy agents:a review and synthesis of the literature[J]. Online J Knowl Synth Nurs,2000,7:4.
CONNOR T H,LAWSON C C,POLOVICH M,et al. Reproductive health risks associated with occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings:a review of the evidence[J]. J Occup Environ Med,2014,56(9):901-910.
MAHMOODI M,SOLEYMAN-JAHI S,ZENDEHDEL K,et al. Chromosomal aberrations,sister chromatid exchanges,and micronuclei in lymphocytes of oncology department personnel handling anti-neoplastic drugs[J]. Drug Chem Toxicol,2017,40(2):235-240.
MORETTI M,GROLLINO M G,PAVANELLO S,et al. Micronuclei and chromosome aberrations in subjects occupationally exposed to antineoplastic drugs:a multicentric approach[J]. Int Arch Occup Environ Health,2015,88(6):683-695.
李海风,高书萍,霍红娟,等. 静脉药物配置中心对细胞毒药物职业防护的调查[J]. 河北医药,2014,36(10):1587-1588.
石钰艳. 静脉药物配置中心护士的职业危害与防护措施[J]. 世界最新医学信息文摘,2016,16(54):74,76.
包健安,沈国荣,王人英,等. 多中心PIVAS集中调配人员抗肿瘤药物职业暴露评估[J]. 中国医院药学杂志,2016,36(9):701-706.
张艳平,高琳艳,李想,等. 细胞毒性药物Ⅰ期临床试验过程中的样本采集方法及职业防护[J]. 中国药理学与毒理学杂志,2019,33(6):458-459.
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:四部[S].2020年版.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:479-483.
LIN H H H,LIN A Y C. Photocatalytic oxidation of 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide via UV/TiO2 in an aqueous environment[J]. Water Res,2014,48:559-568.
陈婷婷.静脉用药调配中心与传统输液配置的对比及实践体会[J].医药卫生,2017(3):294-295.
余波,朱斌,杜琼,等. 细胞毒性药物集中调配的环境污染及密闭式药物配制和转运系统应用评估[J]. 中华全科医学,2019,17(12):2123-2126.
李楠. 静脉用药调配中心与传统科室分散配药的优势比较[J]. 中国医疗前沿,2013,8(24):115-116.
刘志伟,余灵芝,罗陈欣. 细胞毒性药物的合理使用与药学干预[J]. 医院管理论坛,2020,37(8):50-53.
0
Views
2
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution