WANG Shu,DONG Mingyang,CHEN Pengjun,et al.Quality control of the technology method of clinical comprehensive drug evaluation[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(03):275-279.
WANG Shu,DONG Mingyang,CHEN Pengjun,et al.Quality control of the technology method of clinical comprehensive drug evaluation[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(03):275-279. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.03.04.
Quality control of the technology method of clinical comprehensive drug evaluation
At present, there are still some problems in China’s clinical comprehensive drug evaluation, such as the unscientific design of the evaluation content, the nonstandard evaluation method and organizational process, and the evaluation results not meeting the decision-making needs. It is urgent to carry out quality control over the whole process of the clinical comprehensive drug evaluation project. From the technical point of view, the quality control methods of clinical comprehensive drug evaluation are discussed through three links of the evaluation content and design (giving the quality control key points of the theme selection process and scheme design), the evaluation method (discussing the quality control elements of two common evaluation methods, i.e. documentary evidence method and real-world research) and result application transformation (giving suggestions on quality control from the comprehensive analysis of evaluation results, transformation of evaluation results and decision-making), so as to promote the quality improvement of clinical comprehensive drug evaluation.
Agree Collaboration. Appraisal of guidelines for research and evaluation in Europe Ⅱ (AGREE Ⅱ) instrument[EB/OL]. [2022-07-08]. https://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdfhttps://www.agreetrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/AGREE-II-Users-Manual-and-23-item-Instrument-2009-Update-2017.pdf.
INAHTA. A checklist for health technology assessment reports[EB/OL].[2022-07-08]. http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/briefs/http://www.inahta.org/hta-tools-resources/briefs/.
HUSEREAU D, DRUMMOND M, PETROU S, et al. Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS):explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR health economic evaluation publication guidelines good reporting practices task force[J]. Value Health, 2013, 16(2): 231-250.
WELLS G,SHEA B,O’CONNELL D,et al. The New- castle-Ottawa scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of case-control studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol, 2011, 25:603-605.
IMPROTA G, PERRONE A, RUSSO M A, et al. Health technology assessment (HTA) of optoelectronic biosensors for oncology by analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Likert scale[J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2019, 19(1): 140.
CAMPOS M, JIMENEZ F, SANCHEZ G, et al. A metho- dology based on multiple criteria decision analysis for combining antibiotics in empirical therapy[J]. Artif Intell Med, 2020, 102: 101751.
Extraction, isolation, identification and content determination of four chemical components in Yao medicine Ventilago leiocarpa
Study on quality control method of the roots and rhizoma of Toricellia angulata
Identification of components, fingerprint and content determination of the effective parts of Dracocephalum moldavica
Study on quality control method of Qiguiling mixture
Research progress on harvesting and processing methods and quality control of Moutan Cortex
Related Author
XIA Xueqing
HUANG Jianyou
HUANG Zhoufeng
GAO Meimei
HUANG Hongmiao
LU Guoshou
LI Xue
NIE Yushan
Related Institution
College of Pharmacy, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine
Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region Institute of Traditional Medical and Pharmaceutical Sciences
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Traditional Chinese Medicine Quality Standards
Engineering Research Center for the Development and Application of Ethnic Medicine and TCM/State Key Laboratory of Functions and Applications of Medicinal Plants, Guizhou Medical University