OBJECTIVE

2

To compare the clinical comprehensive value of 15 Chinese patent medicines for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B， in order to provide reference for clinical rational drug use.

METHODS

2

According to the

Management Guidelines for Clinical Comprehensive Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals （2021 Version for Trial Implementation）

， systematic literature review， meta-analysis and other related data analysis methods were used to perform qualitative and quantitative analysis for the safety， efficacy， economy， suitability， accessibility and innovation of 15 Chinese patent medicines.

RESULTS

2

In terms of safety， most of the adverse drug reactions of chronic hepatitis B Chinese patent medicines before the market were unobserved or unclear； post-marketing safety took nucleoside analogs as the intermediate bridge for meta-analysis， there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse drug reactions among the combined regimens of Chinese patent medicines （

P

＞0.05）， except that the combination regimen of Fuzheng huayu capsule， Compound yiganling capsules versus combination regimen of Jiuwei gantai capsules showed statistically significant differences （

P

＜0.05）. In terms of effectiveness， the results of network meta-analysis showed that most Chinese patent medicines， such as Fuzheng huayu capsules combined regimens， had no significant differences in effective rate， HBeAg negative conversion rate and HBV-DNA negative conversion rate （

P

＞0.05）； however， in reducing the liver elastic hardness value， the combined regimen of Dangfei liganning tablet （capsule） was better than the other combined regimens （

P

＜0.05）. In terms of economy， the highest cost was the Shuganning injection， and the lowest was Hepatitis B qingre jiedu granules. In terms of suitability， most of the medicines were capsules， tablets and granules， which only needed to be sealed to store and taken orally or taken with boiling water. Compared with injections and some similar products that required strict control of storage temperature， its suitability was better. In terms of accessibility， from the perspective of drug price and affordability， Shuganning injection had the highest average daily cost， the number of days that needed to be borne by the average daily wage was the highest； the average daily cost of Compound yiganling tablets was the lowest， and the number of days required to be borne by the average daily wage was the lowest. From the perspective of availability， Compound biejia ruangan tablets， Dangfei liganning capsules and Wuzhi granules were easier to obtain. In terms of innovation， the 15 Chinese patent medicines included in the study were all domestically produced medicines with a relatively long-term theoretical basis of traditional Chinese medicine and experience in human medicine， and had good industrial innovation. Among them， Compound huayu tablets （capsules） and Anluo huaxian pills were protected varieties of traditional Chinese medicine； Fuzheng huayu tablets （capsules） with more patents had 6 valid patents， all of which were patents for invention.

CONCLUSIONS

2

Wuzhi capsule，

Sedum sarmentosum

granules， Compound yiganling tablets， Rhubarb buchong pills and Dangfei liganning capsules have high clinical comprehensive value.