Development of the index system of the quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care outpatient department

GE Yanhui; CHEN Xiaoli; ZHAO Xiaoyu; CHEN Zhe; GUAN Kelei; DU Shuzhang

doi:10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.21.14

您当前的位置：

首页 >

文章列表页 >

Development of the index system of the quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care outpatient department

更新时间：2023-11-10

- Development of the index system of the quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care outpatient department
- ZHONGGUO YAOFANG Vol. 34, Issue 21, Pages: 2649-2653(2023)
- 作者机构：
  
  郑州大学第一附属医院药学部，郑州　450052
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
- DOI：10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.21.14
  CLC： R952
- Published：15 November 2023，
  
  Received：04 June 2023，
  
  Revised：26 September 2023，
扫描看全文
葛艳慧,陈晓莉,赵晓玉等.医院咳喘药学服务门诊药师培训质量评价标准指标体系构建 ^Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(21):2649-2653.

GE Yanhui,CHEN Xiaoli,ZHAO Xiaoyu,et al.Development of the index system of the quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care outpatient department[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(21):2649-2653.
葛艳慧,陈晓莉,赵晓玉等.医院咳喘药学服务门诊药师培训质量评价标准指标体系构建 ^Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(21):2649-2653. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.21.14.

GE Yanhui,CHEN Xiaoli,ZHAO Xiaoyu,et al.Development of the index system of the quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care outpatient department[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(21):2649-2653. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.21.14.

摘要

目的

构建医院咳喘药学服务门诊（CWPC）药师培训质量评价标准指标体系，为CWPC药师培训师资的选择以及培训方案的改善提供依据。

方法

以柯氏模型为基础，采用德尔菲法对国内10个省份的13家三级甲等医院的15名专家进行函询，建立CWPC药师培训质量评价标准指标体系。采用层次分析法确定各级指标权重，并根据各级指标权重量化CWPC药师培训质量评价标准指标体系。

结果

专家权威系数为0.810，判断系数为0.727，熟悉系数为0.893。各级指标的肯德尔协调系数为0.308～0.687，

检验

均小于0.05，说明专家函询结果的一致性高。经过2轮专家函询后，确定了以柯氏模型为基础的CWPC药师培训质量评价标准指标体系，包括4个一级指标（学员反应层、学习收获层、行为改善层、培训成果层）、12个二级指标（培训需求、教学方法、理论知识、实践技能、岗位能力、患者受益等）和44个三级指标（培训目标明确、CWPC核心制度、特殊装置的操作和评价、咳喘患者治疗相关专业知识、推进CWPC的建设、患者依从性提高等）。

结论

构建的医院CWPC药师培训质量评价标准指标体系具有一定权威性和科学性，为医院CWPC药师培训质量评价提供了科学的理论依据。

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the index system of quality evaluation standard for pharmacist training in cough and wheeze pharmaceutical care （CWPC） outpatient department， and to provide a basis for the selection of CWPC pharmacist training teachers and the improvement of training plans.

METHODS

Based on Kirkpatrick model， using the Delphi method， a total of 15 experts from 13 tertiary hospitals in 10 provinces in China were consulted to establish the standard index system of the quality evaluation for CWPC pharmacists training. Analytic hierarchy process （AHP） was adopted to determine the weights of each indicator and quantify the index system according to the weights of indicators at all levels.

RESULTS

The coefficient of expert authority was 0.810， the judgment coefficient was 0.727， and the familiarity coefficient was 0.893. The Kendall coordination coefficient of each index was 0.308-0.687. The

values of

test were all less than 0.05， which indicated that the degree of coordination of the experts was high. After two rounds of correspondence， Kirkpatrick model-based index system of quality evaluation standard for CWPC pharmacist training was determined. The index system included 4 first-level indexes （participants’ reaction layer， learning gain layer， behavior improvement layer， training outcome layer）， 12 second-level indexes （such as training needs， teaching methods， theoretical knowledge， practical skills， job abilities， patient benefits， etc.） and 44 third-level indexes （such as clear training objectives， core system of CWPC， special device operation and evaluation， professional knowledge related to the treatment of cough and wheeze patients， promoting the construction of CWPC， improving patient compliance）.

CONCLUSIONS

The constructed index system of quality evaluation standard for CWPC pharmacist training has a certain level of authority and scientificity， and provides a scientific theoretical basis for quality evaluation of CWPC pharmacist training.

关键词

咳喘药学服务门诊药师培训质量评价标准指标体系柯氏模型

Keywords

pharmacisttraining qualityevaluation standardindex systemKirkpatrick model

references

郁件康，龚银华，郁文刘，等. PCCM咳喘药学服务门诊互联网+智慧药学服务路径管理模式的构建与评价[J]. 医药导报，2023，42（8）：1158-1165.

YU J K，GONG Y H，YU W L，et al. Establishment and evaluation of the Internet+intelligent pharmaceutical care pathway management mode in the pharmacist-managed cough and wheeze clinic of PCCM[J]. Her Med，2023，42（8）：1158-1165.

周后凤，刘静，郑冬妮，等. 咳喘药学门诊服务模式的建立及成效分析[J]. 中国药业，2022，31（12）：35-38.

ZHOU H F，LIU J，ZHENG D N，et al. Establishment and effectiveness analysis of outpatient pharmacy clinical services model of cough and asthma[J]. China Pharm，2022，31（12）：35-38.

赵艳，马颖，徐王权，等. 国内培训效果评估模型的应用现状与思考[J]. 中国公共卫生管理，2014，30（6）：793-795.

ZHAO Y，MA Y，XU W Q，et al. Application and thinking of training effect evaluation model in China[J]. Chin J Public Health Manag，2014，30（6）：793-795.

孙丹丹，梁涛. 柯氏评估模型在医学相关培训中的应用现状[J]. 中华护理教育，2015，12（12）：947-949.

SUN D D，LIANG T. Application status of Kirschner’s evaluation model in medical related training[J]. Chin J Nurs Educ，2015，12（12）：947-949.

黄珊珊.我国临床药师培训模式现状的探讨[J]. 卫生职业教育，2018，36（12）：138-139.

HUANG S S. Discussion on the current situation of clinical pharmacist training mode in China[J]. Health Vocat Educ，2018，36（12）：138-139.

李慧馨，吴秋惠，蔡俊，等.基于柯氏模型构建执业药师培训效果评价指标体系[J]. 药学与临床研究，2021，29（2）：157-160.

LI H X，WU Q H，CAI J，et al. Establishing an evaluation index system for effects of licensed pharmacist training based on the Kirkpatrick model[J]. Pharm Clin Res，2021，29（2）：157-160.

孟晓晖，张瑛，余春辉.柯氏和CIPP模型评价临床药师培训效果的研究[J]. 中国医院用药评价与分析，2015，15（2）：263-266.

MENG X H，ZHANG Y，YU C H. Kirkpatrick model and CIPP model in the evaluation of the training effect on clinical pharmacists[J]. Eval Anal Drug Use Hosp China，2015，15（2）：263-266.

曾照云，程安广. 德尔菲法在应用过程中的严谨性评估：基于信息管理视角[J]. 情报理论与实践，2016，39（2）：64-68.

ZENG Z Y，CHENG A G. Rigorous assessment of Delphi method in the course of application：based on the perspective of information management[J]. Inf Stud Theory Appl，2016，39（2）：64-68.

郝洁，乔丽娟，黄惠涛，等.基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建医院药师工作满意度量表[J]. 中国医院药学杂志，2021，41（2）：200-206.

HAO J，QIAO L J，HUANG H T，et al. Construction of hospital pharmacist job satisfaction scale by Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm，2021，41（2）：200-206.

楚尧娟，尹钊，梁艳，等.利用Delphi法和层次分析法构建医院药师核心能力的指标体系[J]. 中国医院药学杂志，2019，39（11）：1198-1202.

CHU Y J，YIN Z，LIANG Y，et al. The index system of hospital pharmacists’ core competence constructed by using Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm，2019，39（11）：1198-1202.

余进，陈维进，王弘，等.层次分析法在确定评估体系指标权重中的应用[J]. 中国医疗设备，2013，28（12）：44-47.

YU J，CHEN W J，WANG H，et al. Application of the analytic hierarchy process in establishing the weight values of PACS score system[J]. China Med Devices，2013，28（12）：44-47.

尚星辰，林征，谢晓峰，等.基于柯氏模型的护士规范化培训质量指标体系构建[J]. 护理研究，2019，33（18）：3095-3100.

SHANG X C，LIN Z，XIE X F，et al. Construction of the standardized nursing training quality index system based on the Kirkpatrick model[J]. Chin Nurs Res，2019，33（18）：3095-3100.

雷芳金，赖红燕，陈亿娟. 以柯氏模型为导向的骨科低年资护士核心能力培训效果评价指标体系的构建研究[J]. 护理实践与研究，2016，13（21）：93-96.

LEI F J，LAI H Y，CHEN Y J. Study on the construction of evaluation index system of core competence training effect of junior nurses in orthopedics based on Kirschner model[J]. Nurs Pract Res，2016，13（21）：93-96.

ROSS B，PENKUNAS M J，MAHER D，et al.Evaluating results of the implementation research MOOC using Kirkpatrick’s four-level model：a cross-sectional mixed-methods study[J]. BMJ Open，2022，12（5）：e054719.

Views

下载量

CSCD

Alert me when the article has been cited

提交

Tools

Publicity Resources

No data

Related Author

No data

Related Institution

No data

Address：8/F,129 Daping Main Street,Yuzhong District,Chongqing 400042,P.R.China
Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder Electronics co., LTD 渝ICP备15012710号公网安备50010302001817
It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.

⁰