浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.重庆三峡职业学院农林科技学院,重庆 400155
2.重庆三峡医药高等专科学校药学院,重庆 404120
3.重庆三峡学院生物与食品工程学院,重庆 404120
Published:15 August 2024,
Received:28 January 2024,
Revised:03 June 2024,
扫 描 看 全 文
谭鹏昊,程育希,郭冬琴等.前胡药材产地干燥加工方法研究 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(15):1844-1848.
TAN Penghao,CHENG Yuxi,GUO Dongqin,et al.Study on the drying processing methods of Peucedanum praeruptorum in producing area[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(15):1844-1848.
谭鹏昊,程育希,郭冬琴等.前胡药材产地干燥加工方法研究 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(15):1844-1848. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.15.08.
TAN Penghao,CHENG Yuxi,GUO Dongqin,et al.Study on the drying processing methods of Peucedanum praeruptorum in producing area[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(15):1844-1848. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.15.08.
目的
2
比较产地不同干燥加工方法对前胡药材质量的影响,筛选其最佳产地干燥加工方法。
方法
2
分别采用传统晒干、自然阴干和电热恒温鼓风干燥、真空干燥、红外干燥和真空冷冻干燥等干燥加工方法对前胡药材进行处理,以折干率、含水量、浸出物含量、颜色色度值以及4种香豆素类成分含量为指标,采用逼近理想解排序法进行综合质量评价。
结果
2
不同干燥加工方法下,12份前胡药材样品的折干率为31.56%~40.10%,含水量为6.96%~8.58%,浸出物含量为27.56%~43.10%,红绿度值为1.80~7.50,黄蓝度值为19.90~30.20,明度值为46.90~59.90;伞形花内酯、白花前胡甲素、白花前胡乙素、白花前胡E素的含量分别为≤0.05、3.70~14.05、0.72~2.37、0.81~3.90 mg/g,总含量为5.47~19.65 mg/g;40 ℃电热恒温鼓风干燥下的前胡药材综合得分最高。
结论
2
40 ℃电热恒温鼓风干燥是前胡药材最佳的产地干燥加工方法。
OBJECTIVE
2
To compare the effects of different drying processing methods in the producing area on the quality of
Peucedanum praeruptorum
, and screen the optimal drying processing in the producing area.
METHODS
2
P. praeruptorum
was processed by traditional drying in the sun, drying in the shade, and modern drying processing methods such as electric heating and blast drying, vacuum drying, infrared drying, and vacuum freeze drying. Technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) method was used to perform the comprehensive quality evaluation using drying rate, water content, extract content, color chroma value, and the contents of 4 coumarins as indexes.
RESULTS
2
Under different drying processing methods, the drying rates of 12 samples of
P. praeruptorum
were 31.56%-40.10%; the moisture contents were 6.96%-8.58%, and the extract contents were 27.56%-43.10%; the color chroma values red green degree, yellow blue degree and brightness were 1.80-7.50, 19.90-30.20, 46.90-59.90, respectively. The contents of umbelliferolactone, praeruptorin A, praeruptorin B and praeruptorin E were ≤0.05, 3.70-14.05, 0.72-2.37, 0.81-3.90 mg/g, respectively; and the total contents were 5.47-19.65 mg/g. The comprehensive score of
P. praeruptorum
was the highest under the condition of drying at 40 ℃ by electric heating and blast.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The drying method at 40 ℃ by electric heating and blast is the first choice for
P. praeruptorum
in the producing area.
前胡产地干燥加工颜色色度值浸出物香豆素类成分折干率含水量
drying processing in producing areacolor chroma valuesextractscoumarinsdrying ratewater content
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:一部[M]. 2020年版.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:277.
National Pharmacopoeia Commission. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China:part Ⅰ[M].2020 edition. Beijing:China Medical Science and Technology Press,2020:277.
SHI T T,ZHANG X B,ZHANG K,et al. Study of extrac- ting Peucedanum praeruptorum planted area in Ningguo of Anhui province based on multi-source and multi-phase image[J]. China J Chin Mater Med,2017,42(22):4362-4367.
杜伦静,宋宁宁,李筱姣,等. 白花前胡有效活性成分影响因素研究进展[J]. 南方农业,2022,16(19):148-152.
DU L J,SONG N N,LI X J,et al. Research progress on influencing factors of effective active components of Peucedanum praeruptorum[J]. South China Agric,2022,16(19):148-152.
王帅,石燕红,王瑞,等. 中药前胡中香豆素类化学成分及其分析方法、药理作用研究进展[J]. 上海中医药杂志,2022,56(9):89-99.
WANG S,SHI Y H,WANG R,et al. Advances in chemical compositions,analytical methods and pharmacological effects of coumarins in Peucedani Radix[J]. Shanghai J Tradit Chin Med,2022,56(9):89-99.
荔淑楠,王引权,马丽丽,等. 不同干燥方式对当归性状、显微形态、活性成分含量和抗氧化物酶活性的影响[J]. 天然产物研究与开发,2020,32(8):1396-1404,1342.
LI S N,WANG Y Q,MA L L,et al. Appearance characters,micromorphology,active component content and antioxidant enzyme activity of Angelica sinensis under different drying methods[J]. Nat Prod Res Dev,2020,32(8):1396-1404,1342.
邱晓霞,张玲,岳婧怡,等. 宁前胡中3种香豆素含量影响因素的考察[J]. 中药材,2016,39(4):713-716.
QIU X X,ZHANG L,YUE J Y,et al. Investigation on influencing factors of three coumarins in Peucedani Radix[J]. J Chin Med Mater,2016,39(4):713-716.
任江剑,孙健,俞旭平,等. 不同产地加工方法对前胡药材品质的影响[J]. 中国现代中药,2021,23(5):844-848.
REN J J,SUN J,YU X P,et al. Effects of different habitat processing methods on quality of Peucedani Radix[J]. Mod Chin Med,2021,23(5):844-848.
朱兴龙,陈晓妍,晏宇杭,等. 不同干燥加工方式的白芷饮片质量评价[J]. 中国药房,2022,33(24):2985-2989.
ZHU X L,CHEN X Y,YAN Y H,et al. Quality evaluation of Angelica dahurica decoction pieces processed by different drying methods[J]. China Pharm,2022,33(24):2985-2989.
李小兰,高欣缘,孙杰,等. 基于HPLC结合化学计量学研究黄芪茎叶的最适采收期[J]. 食品工业科技,2024,45(4):229-237.
LI X L,GAO X Y,SUN J,et al.Study on the optimal harvest time of stems and leaves of Astragalus membranaceus based on HPLC and chemometrics[J].Sci Technol Food Ind,2024,45(4):229-237.
潘佳星,刘宇文,伍勋,等. 前胡药材中香豆素类成分稳定性考察[J]. 中国药师,2021,24(3):583-586.
PAN J X,LIU Y W,WU X,et al. Study on the stability of coumarin components in Peucedani Radix[J]. China Pharm,2021,24(3):583-586.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution