浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.泰兴市人民医院总务科,江苏 泰兴 225300
2.中国药科大学国际医药商学院,南京 211198
3.泰兴市人民医院药学部,江苏 泰兴 225300
Published:15 September 2024,
Received:02 April 2024,
Revised:31 July 2024,
移动端阅览
陈坤福,李军,顾玲等.我国药品说明书可读性评价体系的构建 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(17):2072-2076.
CHEN Kunfu,LI Jun,GU Ling,et al.Construction of evaluation system for the readability of drug instructions in China[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(17):2072-2076.
陈坤福,李军,顾玲等.我国药品说明书可读性评价体系的构建 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(17):2072-2076. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.17.03.
CHEN Kunfu,LI Jun,GU Ling,et al.Construction of evaluation system for the readability of drug instructions in China[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(17):2072-2076. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.17.03.
目的
2
构建符合我国患者需求的药品说明书可读性评价体系,为提高我国药品说明书可读性提供科学依据。
方法
2
运用文献研究法、专家咨询法构建药品说明书可读性的评价指标集,通过层次分析法确定评价体系的指标权重,构建药品说明书可读性评价体系,并以醋酸地塞米松乳膏的药品说明书为例,运用问卷调查法和模糊综合评价法对评价体系进行实证检验。
结果
2
建立的药品说明书可读性评价体系包含文字表达、数值应用、内容设计、行为建议、排版设计5个一级指标,以及通俗易懂的词语、长度合适的句子等17个二级指标。该体系的信效度检验均符合要求。100位受访者对醋酸地塞米松乳膏的药品说明书可读性的评分为4.24分,为良好。
结论
2
本研究建立的说明书可读性评价体系可用于评估我国药品说明书的质量和可读性。
OBJECTIVE
2
To develop the evaluation system for the readability of drug instructions based on Chinese patient needs, and to provide scientific evidence for improving the readability of drug instructions in China.
METHODS
2
The literature review and expert consultation were adopted to establish the evaluation index system for the readability of drug instructions. Then, by the analytic hierarchy process, the index weight in the evaluation system was determined, and the evaluation system for the readability of drug instructions was established. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation was used to test the evaluation system, taking drug instruction of Dexamethasone acetate cream as an example.
RESULTS
2
The evaluation system for the readability of drug instructions was established with 5 primary criteria such as text expression, numerical application, content design, behavioral suggestions, and layout design, as well as 17 sub-criteria such as easy-to-understand words and appropriately long sentences. The reliability and validity tests met the requirements. The result of 100 respondents evaluating the readability of the drug instructions of Dexamethasone acetate cream showed that the readability of drug instructions was scored as good as 4.24.
CONCLUSIONS
2
Established evaluation system for the readability of drug instructions in the study can be used to evaluate the quality and readability of drug instructions in China.
药品说明书可读性评价体系层次分析法模糊综合评价法
readabilityevaluation systemanalytic hierarchy processfuzzy comprehensive evaluation method
汤韧,王晓燕,杨悦. 欧美非处方药药品说明书可读性测试简介及启示[J]. 中国药物警戒,2013,10(8):464-467.
TANG R,WANG X Y,YANG Y. Brief introduction and implication of the package leaflet readability guidelines of FDA and EMA[J]. Chin J Pharmacovigil,2013,10(8):464-467.
赵婷婷,赵建中,王海学. 关于规范国内已上市药品说明书的几点思考[J]. 中国临床药理学杂志,2020,36(14):2153-2155.
ZHAO T T,ZHAO J Z,WANG H X. Considerations of standardizing domestic approved drug package inserts[J]. Chin J Clin Pharmacol,2020,36(14):2153-2155.
朱玉华,张华锋,许静,等. 药品说明书中存在的问题及其建议[J]. 医药导报,2010,29(4):546-547.
ZHU Y H,ZHANG H F,XU J,et al. Problems existing in drug instructions and their suggestions[J]. Her Med,2010,29(4):546-547.
梁婉萍,高钰琳. 健康教育文本材料评估工具研究进展[J]. 中国健康教育,2020,36(2):171-174.
LIANG W P,GAO Y L. A review on health education text material assessment tools[J]. Chin J Health Educ,2020,36(2):171-174.
DOAK C C,DOAK L G,ROOT J H. Teaching patients with low literacy skills[J]. Am J Nurs,1996,96(12):16.
HELITZER D,HOLLIS C,COTNER J,et al. Health li-teracy demands of written health information materials:an assessment of cervical cancer prevention materials[J]. Cancer Control,2009,16(1):70-78.
孙振球.医学综合评价方法及其应用[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2006:11-13.
SUN Z Q. Comprehensive evaluation methods in medicine and their applications [M]. Beijing:Chemical Indu- stry Press,2006:11-13.
王文. 三级公立医院外科医师个人绩效指标体系研究:以Z医院胃肠外科为例[D]. 重庆:重庆医科大学,2020.
WANG W. A study on individual performance index system of surgeons in tertiary public hospitals:take the gastrointestinal surgery department of Z Hospital as an example[D].Chongqing:Chongqing Medical University,2020.
EISINGA R,TE GROTENHUIS M,PELZER B. The re-liability of a two-item scale:Pearson,Cronbach,or Spearman-Brown?[J]. Int J Public Health,2013,58(4):637-642.
肖悦. 中国自由贸易试验区背景下智慧港口评价指标体系构建研究[D]. 杭州:浙江大学,2022.
XIAO Y. Research on the evaluation system of smart port under the background of China pilot free trade zone[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2022.
许亚桃,吴立宝. 基于Delphi-AHP高中数学建模教学评价指标体系的研究[J]. 内江师范学院学报,2023,38(2):113-119.
XU Y T,WU L B. On the evaluation index system of senior high mathematical modeling teaching based on Delphi-AHP approach[J]. J Neijiang Norm Univ,2023,38(2):113-119.
HULLAND J,CHOW Y H,LAM S. Use of causal models in marketing research:a review[J]. Int J Res Mark,1996,13(2):181-197.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution