浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
- Journal Information
- Archive
- Submission
- For Reviewers
- Statement and Policies
Construction of a scientific research indicator evaluation system for pharmaceutical personnel from the perspective of children’s hospital
- ZHONGGUO YAOFANG Vol. 35, Issue 18, Pages: 2193-2198(2024)
- 作者机构：
1.天津市儿童医院（天津大学儿童医院）药剂科，天津;300134
2.天津市儿童出生缺陷防治重点实验室，天津 300134
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.18.01
CLC： R95Published：30 September 2024，
Received：09 May 2024，
Revised：26 August 2024，
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
高艳,李欣,高翔等.儿童医院视角下药学人员科研指标评价体系的构建 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(18):2193-2198.
GAO Yan,LI Xin,GAO Xiang,et al.Construction of a scientific research indicator evaluation system for pharmaceutical personnel from the perspective of children’s hospital[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(18):2193-2198.
高艳,李欣,高翔等.儿童医院视角下药学人员科研指标评价体系的构建 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(18):2193-2198. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.18.01.
GAO Yan,LI Xin,GAO Xiang,et al.Construction of a scientific research indicator evaluation system for pharmaceutical personnel from the perspective of children’s hospital[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(18):2193-2198. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.18.01.
摘要
目的
2
构建适用于儿童医院药学人员的科研指标评价体系，为药学人员的科研能力评价提供技术支持和参考依据。
方法
2
运用文献/文本调研法，查找科研管理的相关文献、政策法规和研究报告；采用头脑风暴法梳理关键要素，逐级分解各级指标。在此基础上，使用专家访谈法，明确关键要素，初步拟定三级指标评价体系，并据此制作函询问卷。最后运用德尔菲法，通过3项筛选标准[重要性赋值＞3.5、变异系数＜25%、不重要百分比（包括不太重要和很不重要）＜50%]，建立药学人员科研指标评价体系。
结果
2
两轮专家函询均发放问卷36份，回收36份，回收率和有效率均为100%。两轮函询专家的判断系数平均值为0.912，熟悉程度平均值为0.747，专家权威系数平均值为0.830。经过第二轮函询后，一级指标的肯德尔协调系数为0.269，二级指标为0.379，三级指标为0.460，均显著高于第一轮专家函询结果（
P
＜0.01）。最终确定了药学人员科研指标评价体系一级指标4个、二级指标18个、三级指标62个。
结论
2
本研究所选儿童医院药学专家权威性较高、专业覆盖面广；构建的药学人员科研指标评价体系具有一定的标准性和规范性，可为药学人员的专业水平考核、科研能力评价提供有力参考。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
2
To establish a research indicator evaluation system suitable for pharmaceutical personnel in children’s hospitals， and provide technical support and reference basis for the evaluation of scientific research capabilities of pharmacy personnel.
METHODS
2
The literature/text research methods were adopted to search related literature， policies， regulations and research reports of scientific research management； brainstorming method was used to sort out the key elements and decompose the indicators at all levels step by step. On this basis， using the method of expert interview， the key elements were clarified， the three-level index evaluation system was preliminarily drawn up， and the letter inquiry paper was made accordingly. Finally， Delphi method was used to establish the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists through three screening criteria [importance assignment＞3.5， coefficient of variation＜25%， and unimportant percentage （including unimportant and very unimportant）＜50%].
RESULTS
2
Overall 36 questionnaires were distributed by two rounds of expert letters， and 36 questionnaires were recovered， with a recovery rate and an effective rate of 100% for both rounds. The average expert judgment coefficient was 0.912， the average expert familiarity level was 0.747， and the average expert authority coefficient was 0.830. After the second round of letters and inquiries， the values of Kendall’s
W
of the first-level， the second-level and the third-level indicators were 0.269， 0.379 and 0.460， which were significantly higher than the results of the first round of inquiry （
P
＜0.01）. Finally， the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists was determined with 4 first-level indicators， 18 second-level indicators and 62 third-level indicators.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The pharmaceutical experts from the children’s hospital selected in this study have high authority and wide professional coverage； the evaluation system of scientific research indicators for pharmacists has certain standards and norms， which can provide a powerful reference for the professional level assessment and scientific research ability evaluation of pharmacists.
关键词
科研能力评价评价指标体系儿童医院儿科药师
Keywords
evaluation indicator systemchildren’s hospitalpediatric pharmacist
references
田波，胡瑞钺，李志优，等. 应用德尔菲法和层次分析法构建药学人员科研能力评价体系[J]. 安徽医药，2020，24（10）：2099-2104.
TIAN B，HU R Y，LI Z Y，et al. Establishment of pharmacist evaluation system using Delphi method and analytic hierarchy process[J]. Anhui Med Pharm J，2020，24（10）：2099-2104.
梁密，赵红艳，张圆圆，等. “双一流” 建设背景下学术型医学研究生科研能力培养体系建设现状的调查与分析[J]. 中华医学教育杂志，2022，42（1）：65-69.
LIANG M，ZHAO H Y，ZHANG Y Y，et al. Investigation and analysis of current status of research capacity training for academic medical graduates under the background of “double first-class” construction[J]. Chin J Med Educ，2022，42（1）：65-69.
屈京楼，朱亚鑫，曲波. 德尔菲法在医学教育研究中的应用[J]. 中华医学教育杂志，2019，39（3）：227-230.
QU J L，ZHU Y X，QU B. The Delphi method and its application in medical education research[J]. Chin J Med Educ，2019，39（3）：227-230.
王昕宇，魏娜，王岚. 科研育人视域下医学生科研诚信指标评价体系的构建[J]. 中国医学教育技术，2022，36（5）：617-623.
WANG X Y，WEI N，WANG L. Construction of evalu-ation system of scientific research integrity index for medical students from the perspective of scientific research and cultivating talents[J]. China Med Educ Technol，2022，36（5）：617-623.
范娜. 三级甲等医院机动护士岗位胜任力模型指标体系的构建[D]. 长春：吉林大学，2017.
FAN N.The construction of index system of competency model of mobile nurses in tertiary hospitals[D].Changchun：Jilin University，2017.
林思思，陈丽萍，江绮云，等. 抗肺癌药品临床综合评价指标体系的构建及实证研究[J]. 中国药房，2023，34（11）：1313-1319.
LIN S S，CHEN L P，JIANG Q Y，et al. Construction of clinical comprehensive evaluation index system of anti-lung cancer drugs and empirical study[J]. China Pharm，2023，34（11）：1313-1319.
王景英. 教育评价理论与实践[M]. 长春：东北师范大学出版社，2002：132.
WANG J Y. Theory and practice of educational evaluation[M]. Changchun：Northeast Normal University Press，2002：132.
石景芬，王宇婵，刘志会，等. 区县级医院学科发展竞争力指标体系研究[J]. 中国医院，2024，28（5）：37-40.
SHI J F，WANG Y C，LIU Z H，et al. Study on the competitiveness indicator system for discipline development in district and county hospitals[J]. Chin Hosp，2024，28（5）：37-40.
颜佳冉. 传染病专科护理质量评价指标体系的构建及应用研究[D]. 西安：中国人民解放军空军军医大学，2023.
YAN J R. Study on the construction and application of a nursing quality evaluation index system for infectious di-sease specialty[D]. Xi’an：PLA Air Force Military Medical University，2023.
赖宗浪. 运用改良德尔菲法对晚期乳腺癌中医辨证规范进行研究[D]. 北京：北京中医药大学，2011.
LAI Z L. Research on TCM syndrome differentiation criterion of advanced breast cancer with modified Delphi method[D].Beijing：Beijing University of Chinese Medicine，2011.
陈新华. 造口治疗师岗位胜任力模型的构建[D]. 济南：山东大学，2018.
CHEN X H. Establishment of post competency model for enterostomal therapist[D]. Jinan：Shandong University，2018.
褚振江. 用好科技评价 “指挥棒”[J]. 中国军转民，2021（8）：17.
CHU Z J. Make good use of technology to evaluate the “baton”[J]. Def Ind Convers China，2021（8）：17.
王彦芳，陈娟娟，关克磊，等. 医院药师科研能力评价指标体系的构建及其信效度评价[J]. 中国药房，2023，34（2）：242-245.
WANG Y F，CHEN J J，GUAN K L，et al. Construction of evaluation index system for scientific research ability of hospital pharmacists and analysis of its reliability and validity[J]. China Pharm，2023，34（2）：242-245.
韩旭东. “双一流” 建设高校高层次人才全周期评价模式构建[J]. 西南大学学报（社会科学版），2024，50（3）：192-202.
HAN X D. Construction of a full-cycle evaluation model for high-level talents in “double first-class” universities[J]. J Southwest Univ Soc Sci Ed，2024，50（3）：192-202.
王之羽，贾运涛，许静，等.儿科门急诊药房用药指导岗位胜任力研究[J].中国医院药学杂志，2022，42（10）：1055-1060.
WANG Z Y，JIA Y T，XU J，et al.Study on medication guidance competency criteria of outpatient and emergency pharmacy in pediatrics[J].Chin J Hosp Pharm，2022，42（10）：1055-1060.
王绚，张永，许静. 基于德尔菲法构建中药注射剂上市后再评价指标体系[J]. 中国医院药学杂志，2021，41（1）：85-88.
WANG X，ZHANG Y，XU J. Constructing post-marketing re-evaluation indicator system for traditional Chinese medicine injection by Delphi method[J]. Chin J Hosp Pharm，2021，41（1）：85-88.
曹苗苗. 医院临床学科科研绩效评价指标体系研究：以L医院为例[D]. 上海：上海交通大学，2020.
CAO M M. Research on establishment of evaluation index system of scientific research performance in public hospitals：take L hospital as an example[D]. Shanghai：Shanghai Jiao Tong University，2020.
王小云，詹俐，邱英. 公立医院科研项目预算绩效评价指标体系构建与应用[J]. 中国医院，2024，28（5）：21-24.
WANG X Y，ZHAN L，QIU Y. Building and application of budget performance evaluation index system for scientific research projects in public hospitals[J]. Chin Hosp，2024，28（5）：21-24.
凡庆涛.国内科研数据研究的现状与提升路径：基于国家社科基金科研数据主题项目数据分析[J].中国高校科技，2021（10）：27-32.
FAN Q T. The current situation and improvement path of domestic scientific research data research：based on data analysis of the National Social Science Fund’s scientific research data theme project[J]. China Univ Sci Technol，2021（10）：27-32.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
- L-PDFDownload
- WORDDownload
- Meta-XMLDownload
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
- Address：8th Floor, Sihuan Building, No. 129 Daping Main Street, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China Postal code：400042
- Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder Electronics co., LTD 渝ICP备15012710号
公网安备50010302001817 - It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
- Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.