浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
河北大学中医学院,河北 保定 071000
Published:15 October 2024,
Received:09 May 2024,
Revised:09 August 2024,
移动端阅览
史佳一,潘罗星,陶宜红等.不同干燥方式对祁菊花品质的影响 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(19):2365-2371.
SHI Jiayi,PAN Luoxing,TAO Yihong,et al.Effects of different drying methods on the quality of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(19):2365-2371.
史佳一,潘罗星,陶宜红等.不同干燥方式对祁菊花品质的影响 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(19):2365-2371. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.19.08.
SHI Jiayi,PAN Luoxing,TAO Yihong,et al.Effects of different drying methods on the quality of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(19):2365-2371. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.19.08.
目的
2
考察不同干燥方式对祁菊花品质的影响,为祁菊花的采收加工提供依据。
方法
2
采用7类共25种干燥方式对祁菊花鲜品进行干燥得到25种样品,以其外观性状及含水量为淘汰指标,去除不合格样品;以6种有效成分(绿原酸、木犀草苷、3,5-
O
-咖啡酰基奎宁酸、槲皮素、木犀草素、黄芩苷)的含量为指标,结合主成分分析(PCA)及偏最小二乘法-判别分析(PLS-DA),以及PCA综合得分排名及每类干燥方式所得的最佳样品,综合选择6种实验样品;以氧化相关酶(多酚氧化酶、过氧化物酶)活性、稳定性及花瓣表面微观形态为指标,对上述6种样品进行质量评价。
结果
2
PCA与PLS-DA结果表明,不同干燥方式所得样品的质量存在明显差异,绿原酸、3,5-
O
-咖啡酰基奎宁酸、黄芩苷这3种成分可能是导致样品产生差异的主要原因,100 ℃蒸汽杀青1 min后再以50 ℃烘干4 h所得样品中有效成分的综合得分最高。经微波功率800 W杀青1 min后再以50 ℃鼓风干燥4 h与100 ℃蒸汽杀青1 min后再以50 ℃烘干4 h这2种联合干燥方式处理的祁菊花中氧化相关酶完全失活,稳定性优于其他干燥方式所得样品;花瓣表面微观形态观察结果显示,以微波功率400 W烘干6 min所得样品与上述2种样品的完整度、平整度最高。
结论
2
从成品质量及干燥效率来看,以100 ℃蒸汽杀青1 min后再以50 ℃烘干4 h是祁菊花的最佳干燥方式。
OBJECTIVE
2
To investigate the effects of different drying methods on the quality of
Chrysanthemum morifolium
, and to provide a basis for the harvesting and processing of
C.
morifolium
.
METHODS
2
Twenty-five samples were obtained by drying the fresh products using 7 types and 25 kinds of drying methods, and the unqualified samples were removed by taking their appearance and moisture content as elimination indexes. The contents of six active ingredients (chlorogenic acid, luteoloside, 3,5-
O
-dicaffeoylquinic acid, quercetin, lignoceroside, baicalin) were used as indicators, and combined with principal component analysis (PCA), partial least square method-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), PCA comprehensive score ranking and the best samples obtained from each drying method to select 6 experimental samples comprehensively. The quality of 6 kinds of samples was evaluated using the activities and stability of oxidation-related enzymes (polyphenol oxidase, peroxidase) and the microscopic morphology of the petal surface as evaluation indexes.
RESULTS
2
The results of PCA and PLS-DA showed significant differences in the quality of samples obtained by different drying methods, and chlorogenic acid, 3,5-
O
-dicaffeoylquinic acid and baicalin might be the main reasons for the differences among the samples. The herbs treated with 100 ℃ steam fixation for 1 min combined with blast drying at 50 ℃ for 4 hours had the highest comprehensive score of active ingredients. The oxidation-related enzymes in
C.
morifolium
treated with microwave 800 W fixation for 1 minute followed by 50 ℃ air drying for 4 hours and 100 ℃ steam sterilization for 1 minute followed by 50 ℃ drying for 4 hours were completely inactivated, and the stability was better than that of samples obtained by other drying methods. The observation results of the microstructure of the petal surface showed that the sample obtained by drying at a microwave power of 400 W for 6 minutes had the highest integrity and flatness compared to the above two samples.
CONCLUSIONS
2
From the perspective of finished product quality and drying efficiency, 100 ℃ steam fixation for 1 min combined with blast drying at 50 ℃ for 4 hours is the best drying method for
C. morifolium
.
祁菊花产地加工干燥方式绿原酸3,5-O-咖啡酰基奎宁酸黄芩苷
origin processingdrying methodchlorogenic acid3,5-O-dicaffeoylquinic acidbaicalin
国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:一部[M]. 2020年版.北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:323.
National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China:volume 1 [M]. 2020 edition. Beijing:China Medical Science and Technology Press,2020:323.
王玉田,曹丽芳, 杨哲, 等.基于FTIR, FT-Raman的脱毒繁育和硫磺熏制祁菊花的药用成分分析研究和光谱表征[J].光谱学与光谱分析, 2016, 36(9):2780-2783.
WANG Y T, CAO L F, YANG Z, et al. Research on the medicinal effective component and characterization of virus-free breeding and sulfur-smoked Qi Chrysanthemum based on FTIR and FT-Raman[J]. Spectrosc Spectr Anal, 2016, 36(9):2780-2783.
赵喜进, 赵帅. 祁菊花的市场情况与种植要点[J]. 特种经济动植物, 2014, 17(1):40.
ZHAO X J, ZHAO S. Market situation and planting points of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Spec Econ Anim Plant, 2014, 17(1):40.
刘文泰, 黄辉, 方红, 等. 本草品汇精要[M]. 北京:中国中医药出版社, 2013:1.
LIU W T, HUANG H, FANG H, et al. Compendium of herbal products[M].Beijing:China Traditional Chinese Medicine Press, 2013:1.
DING K, CAO G, XU Z W, et al. Quantitative analysis coupled with toxic evaluation to investigate the influence of sulfur-fumigation on the quality of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Nat Prod Commun, 2014, 9(9):1357-1358.
王珊, 李友连, 苏靖, 等. 中国药用菊花品种及加工方法变迁的研究[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2017, 52(7):539-542.
WANG S, LI Y L, SU J, et al. Review of the changes of the species and processing methods of Chrysanthemum morifolium[J]. Chin Pharm J, 2017, 52(7):539-542.
潘芸芸, 王庆, 冉聪, 等. 加工及贮藏方式对菊花品质的影响[J]. 食品与机械, 2017, 33(5):141-144, 177.
PAN Y Y, WANG Q, RAN C, et al. Effects of proces- sing and storage methods on the quality of Chrysanthemum[J]. Food Mach, 2017, 33(5):141-144, 177.
SHI X F, CHU J Z, ZHANG Y F, et al. Nutritional and active ingredients of medicinal Chrysanthemum flower heads affected by different drying methods[J]. Ind Crops Prod, 2017, 104:45-51.
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:四部[M]. 2020年版. 北京:中国医药科技出版社, 2020:32.
National Pharmacopoeia Committee. Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China:volume 4 [M]. 2020 edition. Beijing:China Medical Science and Technology Press, 2020:32.
王春花, 曲雪嘉, 孔令钰, 等.基于系统药理学菊花清热解毒功效的分子机制研究[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2021, 60(10):137-142.
WANG C H, QU X J, KONG L Y, et al. Study on mechanism of heat-clearing and detoxifying efficacy of Flos Chrysanthemi based on systems pharmacology[J]. Hubei Agric Sci, 2021, 60(10):137-142.
彭贵龙, 周光明, 秦红英. HPLC同时测定药用白菊花中绿原酸、木犀草素、芹菜素和金合欢素[J]. 天然产物研究与开发, 2014, 26(7):1067-1071.
PENG G L,ZHOU G M,QIN H Y. Simultaneous determination of chlorogenic acid, luteolin, apigenin and aca- cetin in medicinal Chrysanthemum morifolium by HPLC[J]. Nat Prod Res Dev, 2014, 26(7):1067-1071.
雷康藤, 龙娟娟, 杨琳妹, 等. 菊花黄酮化合物组成、抗氧化活性及相关性分析[J]. 山东化工, 2020, 49(1):53-55.
LEI K T, LONG J J, YANG L M, et al. Compositions, antioxidant activities and correlation analysis of flavonoids in Chrysanthemums[J]. Shandong Chem Ind, 2020, 49(1):53-55.
何佳, 黄文康, 马相锋, 等. 基于主成分分析与PLS-DA分析研究浙麦冬道地性与等级评价标准[J]. 中国药学杂志, 2021, 56(4):285-292.
HE J, HUANG W K, MA X F, et al. Geoherbalism and grand evaluation of Zhejiang Ophiopogon japonicas based on PCA and PLS-DA[J]. Chin Pharm J, 2021, 56(4):285-292.
崔莉, 宋双双, 刘峰, 等. 不同干燥方法对菊花褐变相关酶及活性成分的影响研究[J]. 食品科技, 2015, 40(2):39-44.
CUI L, SONG S S, LIU F, et al. Effects of different drying methods on the enzyme activities and active compounds contents from Chrysanthemum morifolium Ramat[J]. Food Sci Technol, 2015, 40(2):39-44.
邓晓颜, 王小兰, 李孟, 等. 怀菊花总黄酮富集纯化工艺优化及其抗炎活性、成分组成研究[J]. 中成药, 2023, 45(9):2815-2821.
DENG X Y, WANG X L, LI M, et al. Optimization of enrichment and purification process for total flavonoids from Huai Chrysanthemum and their anti-inflammatory activity,component composition[J]. Chin Tradit Pat Med, 2023, 45(9):2815-2821.
JIANG G H, KIM Y M, NAM S H, et al. Enzymatic browning inhibition and antioxidant activity of pear juice from a new cultivar of Asian pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai cv. Sinhwa) with different concentrations of ascorbic acid[J]. Food Sci Biotechnol, 2016, 25(1):153-158.
GHEYSARBIGI S, MIRDEHGHAN S H, GHASEMNEZHAD M, et al. The inhibitory effect of nitric oxide on enzymatic browning reactions of in-package fresh pistachios (Pistacia vera L.)[J]. Postharvest Biol Technol, 2020, 159:110998.
LI Y H, WU Z F, WANG X C, et al. Effects of combined infrared and steam blanching on enzyme inactivation and product quality of Chrysanthemum indicum L. flower[J]. J Food Process Preserv, 2019, 43(10):e14119.
王莹. 菊花、当归和黄芪3种中药加工炮制机制及标准化研究[D].天津:天津大学, 2019.
WANG Y. Study on processing mechanism and standar- dization of Chrysanthemum, Angelica and Astragalus[D]. Tianjin:Tianjin University, 2019.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution