浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.南京中医药大学附属医院药学部,南京 210029
2.南京中医药大学第一临床医学院,南京 210029
3.南京中医药大学附属医院中药制剂实验室,南京 210029
Published:15 December 2024,
Received:13 June 2024,
Revised:19 September 2024,
移动端阅览
朱亚苹,刘玉鑫,邵孟其等.基于物理指纹图谱优选加味六君子汤浸膏粉助干剂 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(23):2883-2888.
ZHU Yaping,LIU Yuxin,SHAO Mengqi,et al.Screening of the best drying aid for the extract powder of modified Liujunzi decoction based on physical fingerprint[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(23):2883-2888.
朱亚苹,刘玉鑫,邵孟其等.基于物理指纹图谱优选加味六君子汤浸膏粉助干剂 Δ[J].中国药房,2024,35(23):2883-2888. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.23.08.
ZHU Yaping,LIU Yuxin,SHAO Mengqi,et al.Screening of the best drying aid for the extract powder of modified Liujunzi decoction based on physical fingerprint[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2024,35(23):2883-2888. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2024.23.08.
目的
2
考察不同助干剂对加味六君子汤(MLJZD)浸膏粉吸湿性的影响,并筛选出最佳助干剂。
方法
2
将MLJZD干浸膏与
β
-环糊精、微晶纤维素、乳糖、阿拉伯胶、麦芽糊精、玉米淀粉、甘露醇、糊精、可溶性淀粉、预胶化淀粉10种助干剂分别以药辅质量比1∶0.3、1∶0.5的比例混合均匀,真空干燥后制备成浸膏粉;以含水率、松密度、振实密度、间隙率、卡尔指数、豪斯纳比、休止角和吸湿率8个物理指标建立物理指纹图谱并进行相似度评价;绘制矩阵热点图分析各物理指标对MLJZD浸膏粉吸湿性的影响;测定MLJZD浸膏粉在室温放置
2、4、8、10 h和1、2、3、7 d时的吸湿率,绘制吸湿率-时间曲线图,并筛选出助干效果最好的辅料。
结果
2
物理指纹图谱相似度评价结果显示,制备的MLJZD浸膏粉粉体性质稳定,相似度均在0.90以上;矩阵热点图分析结果显示,MLJZD浸膏粉的吸湿率与松密度、振实密度等具有显著相关性(
P
<0.05);吸湿率-时间曲线图分析结果显示,以药辅质量比1∶0.5制得的MLJZD浸膏粉比以1∶0.3制得的吸湿率小;2种比例下均以乳糖的助干效果最佳,而后是可溶性淀粉、甘露醇。
结论
2
乳糖作为助干剂(药辅质量比为1∶0.5)可以明显改善MLJZD浸膏粉的吸湿效果,可为后续MLJZD固体制剂的辅料选择提供参考。
OBJECTIVE
2
To investigate the effects of different drying aids on the hygroscopic property of extract powder of modified Liujunzi decoction (MLJZD), and screen the best drying aid.
METHODS
2
MLJZD extract was mixed with
β
-cyclodextrin, microcrystalline cellulose, lactose, arabic gum, maltodextrin, corn starch, mannitol, dextrin, soluble starch and pre-gelatinized starch at the mass ratio of 1∶0.3 and 1∶0.5, respectively. The extract powder was prepared after vacuum drying. Physical fingerprints were established with 8 physical indexes, including moisture content, bulk density, vibrating-solid density, gap rate, Carr index, Hausner ratio, angle of rest and hygroscopicity, and then similarity evaluation was performed. The matrix hotspot map was drawn to analyze the influence of physical indexes on hygroscopicity. The moisture absorption rate of MLJZD extract powder was measured at room temperature for 2, 4, 8, 10 h and 1, 2, 3, 7 d. The moisture absorption rate-time curve was drawn, and the best auxiliary materials were selected by comparison.
RESULTS
2
The similarity evaluation results of physical fingerprint showed that the prepared MLJZD extract powder were stable and the similarities were above 0.90. The matrix hotspot analysis showed that there was significant correlation between bulk density and vibratory density and the moisture absorption rate of the MLJZD extract powder (
P
<0.05). The moisture absorption rate-time curve analysis showed that the m
oisture absorption rate of MLJZD extract powder prepared with the mass ratio of 1∶0.5 was lower than prepared with the mass ratio of 1∶0.3. Under both ratios, lactose showed the best drying aid effect, followed by soluble starch and mannitol.
CONCLUSIONS
2
Lactose, as the drying aid (under the mass ratio of 1∶0.5), can obviously improve the hygroabsorbance effect of the extract powder of MLJZD, which provides a reference for the selection of auxiliary materials for MLJZD solid preparations.
加味六君子汤浸膏粉助干剂吸湿性物理指纹图谱
extract powderdrying aidhygroscopicityphysical fingerprint
WU X,DAI Y,NIE K. Research progress of Liujunzi decoction in the treatment of tumor-associated anorexia[J]. Drug Des Devel Ther,2022,16:1731-1741.
孙淑萍,狄留庆,黄耀洲,等. 不同辅料对中药全浸膏制剂防潮效果的比较研究[J]. 中成药,2006,28(6):897-899.
SUN S P,DI L Q,HUANG Y Z,et al. Comparative study on moisture-proof effect of different excipients on Chinese medicine extract preparation[J]. Chin Tradit Pat Med,2006,28(6):897-899.
皮佳鑫,高旭,于悦,等. 赤芍提取物的吸湿性及不同提取工艺和辅料对其吸湿性的影响[J]. 天津中医药大学学报,2012,31(4):221-224.
PI J X,GAO X,YU Y,et al. Moisture absorption of Paeoniae Radix Rubra extract and influence of different extractive process and adjuvants[J]. J Tianjin Univ Tradit Chin Med,2012,31(4):221-224.
朱亚苹,邵孟其,刘玉鑫,等. 扶正解毒颗粒成型工艺优化[J]. 中成药,2024,46(8):2726-2731.
ZHU Y P,SHAO M Q,LIU Y X,et al. Optimization of forming process of Fuzheng jiedu granules[J]. Chin Tradit Pat Med,2024,46(8):2726-2731.
吕志阳,胡新茹,陈静,等. 基于物理指纹图谱评价不同干燥工艺及辅料对黄芩、黄连提取物浸膏粉吸湿性影响[J]. 中草药,2024,55(2):434-445.
LYU Z Y,HU X R,CHEN J,et al. Evaluation of effects of different drying processes and excipients on hygroscopi- city of Scutellariae Radix and Coptidis Rhizoma extracts based on physical fingerprint spectrum[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs,2024,55(2):434-445.
应力健,陈宁姿,樊丽,等. 连翘归尾颗粒成型工艺研究[J]. 中药材,2022,45(3):689-692.
YING L J,CHEN N Z,FAN L,et al. Study on molding technology of Lianqiao guiwei granules[J]. J Chin Med Mater,2022,45(3):689-692.
国家药典委员会. 中华人民共和国药典:四部[M]. 2020年版. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:485.
National Pharmacopoeia Commission. Chinese pharmacopoeia:part Ⅳ[M]. 2020 edition. Beijing:China Medical Science and Technology Press,2020:485.
唐茜,韩云凤,石懿,等. 视力舒颗粒制备工艺优化及其物理指纹图谱建立[J]. 中成药,2023,45(11):3729-3735.
TANG Q,HAN Y F,SHI Y,et al. Optimization of preparation technology and establishment of physical fingerprint of Shilishu granules[J]. Chin Tradit Pat Med,2023,45(11):3729-3735.
施文婷,王寿富,邓桂海,等. 干燥方式对麦门冬汤浸膏粉超高效液相色谱及物理指纹图谱的影响[J]. 世界中医药,2023,18(24):3485-3491,3499.
SHI W T,WANG S F,DENG G H,et al. Effect of drying method on ultra high performance liquid chromatography and physical fingerprint of the extract powder of Maimendong decoction[J]. World Chin Med,2023,18(24):3485-3491,3499.
张青铃. 常用固体制剂辅料吸湿行为及3种中药制剂防潮工艺研究[D]. 福州:福建中医药大学,2021.
ZHANG Q L. Study on moisture absorption behavior of common solid preparation excipients and moisture-proof technology of three traditional Chinese medicine preparations[D]. Fuzhou:Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2021.
曹韩韩,杜若飞,冯怡,等. 干法制粒技术在中药研究中的应用进展[J]. 中草药,2013,44(19):2772-2776.
CAO H H,DU R F,FENG Y,et al. Application progress in dry granulation technology of Chinese materia medica[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs,2013,44(19):2772-2776.
王洋洋,崔可可,刘羽洁,等. 铁皮石斛粉体、破壁饮片吸湿性的比较[J]. 中成药,2019,41(7):1679-1681.
WANG Y Y,CUI K K,LIU Y J,et al. Comparison of hygroscopicity between Dendrobium candidum powder and broken pieces[J]. Chin Tradit Pat Med,2019,41(7):1679-1681.
0
Views
0
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution