浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.武汉科技大学附属华润武钢总医院药学部,武汉 430080
2.湖北中医药大学药学院,武汉 430070
Received:23 October 2024,
Revised:2025-02-06,
Accepted:06 February 2025,
Published:15 March 2025
移动端阅览
梁美锋,万雄飞,廖念,等.不同产地皂角刺多指标定量检测及质量差异评价[J].中国药房,2025,36(05):568-573.
LIANG Meifeng,WAN Xiongfei,LIAO Nian,et al.Multi-index quantitative detection and quality difference evaluation of Gleditsia sinensis from different producing areas[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(05):568-573.
梁美锋,万雄飞,廖念,等.不同产地皂角刺多指标定量检测及质量差异评价[J].中国药房,2025,36(05):568-573. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.05.11.
LIANG Meifeng,WAN Xiongfei,LIAO Nian,et al.Multi-index quantitative detection and quality difference evaluation of Gleditsia sinensis from different producing areas[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(05):568-573. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.05.11.
目的
2
建立不同产地皂角刺的多指标定量检测方法,并评价其质量差异。
方法
2
采用高效液相色谱-一测多评(HPLC-QAMS)法同时检测皂角刺中原儿茶酸、香草酸、异东莨菪内酯、滨蒿内酯、异牡荆素、黄颜木素、花旗松素、漆黄素、槲皮素、山柰酚、刺囊酸、白桦脂酸、
β
-谷甾醇、豆甾醇的含量,色谱柱为Kromasil C
18
,流动相为0.2%磷酸-乙腈溶液(梯度洗脱),检测波长针对不同指标成分分别为254、360、210 nm,柱温为30 ℃,流速为1.0 mL/min,进样量为10 μL;按照《中国药典》方法检测浸出物和总灰分含量;利用化学计量学、加权逼近理想解排序(TOPSIS)分析、Logistic回归模型对不同产地30批(编号S1~S30)皂角刺样品进行质量差异评价。
结果
2
上述14种成分依次在1.55~77.50、0.71~35.50、0.28~14.00、0.96~48.00、1.77~88.50、0.09~4.50、4.65~232.50、1.49~74.50、0.37~18.50、1.18~59.00、7.35~367.50、3.58~179.00、0.49~24.50、0.21~10.50 μg/mL质量浓度范围内线性关系良好(
r
均大于0.999),精密度、稳定性(24 h)及重复性的RSD均小于2.00%,平均加样回收率为96.99%~100.13%(RSD均小于2.00%),相对校正因子重复性良好。浸出物和总灰分含量分别为4.2%~12.5%和0.5%~2.3%。QAMS法与外标法所测得的14种成分的含量差异无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。化学计量学分析结果显示,30批皂角刺样品可聚为3类,其中S1~S11聚为一类,S12~S20聚为一类,S21~S30聚为一类;刺囊酸、白桦脂酸、花旗松素、山柰酚、异牡荆素、滨蒿内酯和原儿茶酸可能是影响不同产地皂角刺质量的差异成分。加权TOPSIS分析结果显示,30批皂角刺的相对贴近度(
J
b
)为0.144 5~0.721 8,其中样品S27的质量最优(
J
b
值为0.721 8)。Logistic回归模型分析结果显示,样品S21~S30为优级,S1~S11为中级,S12~S20为差级。
结论
2
所建立的HPLC-QAMS法操作简便、结果准确,综合评价方法客观、全面,可用于不同产地皂角刺的质量差异评价。
OBJECTIVE
2
To establish a multi-index quantitative detection method, and to evaluate the quality difference of
Gleditsia sinensis
from different producing areas.
METHODS
2
The contents of protocatechuic acid, vanillic acid, isoscopoletin, scoparone, isovitexin, fustin, taxifolin, fisetin, quercetin, kaempferol, echinocystic acid, betulinic acid,
β
-sitosterol and stigmasterol were detected by high performance liquid chromatography-quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker (HPLC-QAMS). The chromatographic column was Kromasil C
18
, the mobile phase was 0.2% phosphoric acid-acetonitrile solution (gradient elution), the detection wavelengths were 254, 360, 210 nm for different index components, the column temperature was 30 ℃, the flow rate was 1.0 mL/min, and the sample injection volume was 10 μL. The contents of extract and total ash were detected according to the method of
Chinese Pharmacopoeia
. The quality differences of 30 batches of
G. sinensis
(No. S1-S30) from different producing areas were evaluated by chemometrics, weighted technique for order preference by similarity to an ideal solution (TOPSIS) analysis and Logistic regression model.
RESULTS
2
The linear ranges of 14 components were 1.55-77.50, 0
.71-35.50, 0.28-14.00, 0.96-48.00, 1.77-88.50, 0.09-4.50, 4.65-232.50, 1.49-74.50, 0.37-18.50, 1.18-59.00, 7.35-367.50, 3.58-179.00, 0.49-24.50 and 0.21-10.50 μg/mL, respectively (all
r
>0.999). The RSDs of precision, stability (24 h) and repeatability were less than 2.00%; the average recoveries were 96.99%-100.13% (all RSDs<2.00%), and the relative correction factor had good repeatability. The contents of extract and total ash were 4.2%-12.5% and 0.5%-2.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the content of 14 components measured by QAMS method and external standard method (
P
>0.05). The results of chemometrics showed that 30 batches of samples were clustered into 3 categories: S1 to S11 form one category, S12 to S20 form another category, and S21 to S30 constitute the third category. Echinocystic acid, betulinic acid, taxifolin, kaempferol, isovitexin, scoparone and protocatechuic acid may be the differential components affecting the quality of
G. sinensis
from different producing areas. The analysis results of the weighted TOPSIS method revealed that relative closeness (
J
b
) for 30 batches of
G. sinensis
ranged from 0.144 5 to 0.721 8, with S27 achieving the highest value (
J
b
) of 0.721 8. The analysis results of the Logistic regression model showed that S21-S30 batches of samples were of superior grade, S1-S11 were of intermediate grade, and S12-S20 were of inferior grade.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The established HPLC-QAMS method is simple and accurate. The comprehensive evaluation method is objective and comprehensive, and can be used to evaluate the quality difference of
G. sinensis
from different producing areas.
吴思佳 , 王可可 , 徐双双 , 等 . 基于HPLC指纹图谱和含量测定的皂角刺配方颗粒质量控制研究 [J ] . 上海中医药大学学报 , 2023 , 37 ( 2 ): 54 - 60,95 .
WU S J , WANG K K , XU S S , et al . Study on quality control of Gleditsiae Spina dispensing granules based on HPLC fingerprint and content determination [J ] . Acad J Shanghai Univ Tradit Chin Med , 2023 , 37 ( 2 ): 54 - 60,95 .
国家药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国药典:一部 [M ] . 2020年版 . 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2020 : 185 .
National Pharmacopoeia Commission . Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China:partⅠ [M ] . 2020 edition. Beijing : China Medical Science and Technology Press , 2020 : 185 .
刘勇 , 张彩虹 , 谢普军 , 等 . 皂角刺化学组成及药理活性应用研究进展 [J ] . 生物质化学工程 , 2023 , 57 ( 2 ): 89 - 98 .
LIU Y , ZHANG C H , XIE P J , et al . Research progress on chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of thorns of Gleditsia sinensis [J ] . Biomass Chem Eng , 2023 , 57 ( 2 ): 89 - 98 .
谢胡敏 , 宓月光 , 徐晓艳 , 等 . 大皂角、猪牙皂和皂角刺中10种黄酮与生物碱成分的含量测定 [J ] . 中国中药杂志 , 2023 , 48 ( 7 ): 1899 - 1907 .
XIE H M , MI Y G , XU X Y , et al . Content determination of ten flavonoids and alkaloids in Gleditsiae Sinensis Fructus,Gleditsiae Fructus Abnormalis,and Gleditsiae Spina [J ] . China J Chin Mater Med , 2023 , 48 ( 7 ): 1899 - 1907 .
朱晶晶 , 王智民 , 高慧敏 , 等 . 一测多评法在中药质量评价中的应用研究进展 [J ] . 中国实验方剂学杂志 , 2016 , 22 ( 16 ): 220 - 228 .
ZHU J J , WANG Z M , GAO H M , et al . Advances on quality evaluation of Chinese materia medica by QAMS [J ] . Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae , 2016 , 22 ( 16 ): 220 - 228 .
梁慧 , 潘晓君 , 杨文惠 , 等 . 基于UPLC指纹图谱和一测多评法的虎杖药材质量评价 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2021 , 32 ( 15 ): 1842 - 1848 .
LIANG H , PAN X J , YANG W H , et al . Quality evaluation of Polygonum cuspidatum by UPLC fingerprint and QAMS [J ] . China Pharm , 2021 , 32 ( 15 ): 1842 - 1848 .
石欢 , 封燮 , 常雅晴 , 等 . 基于多成分含量测定和化学计量学的不同基原白芷药材质量评价研究 [J ] . 中草药 , 2023 , 54 ( 11 ): 3676 - 3684 .
SHI H , FENG X , CHANG Y Q , et al . Quality evaluation of Angelicae Dahuricae Radix based on quantitative analysis of multi-component determination and chemometrics [J ] . Chin Tradit Herb Drugs , 2023 , 54 ( 11 ): 3676 - 3684 .
万雄飞 , 梁美锋 , 廖念 , 等 . 多成分定量分析结合化学计量学和熵权TOPSIS法综合评价益肺清化膏质量 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2024 , 35 ( 15 ): 1837 - 1843 .
WAN X F , LIANG M F , LIAO N , et al . Comprehensive evaluation of Yifei qinghua ointment by multi-component quantitative analysis combined with chemometrics and entropy weight TOPSIS [J ] . China Pharm , 2024 , 35 ( 15 ): 1837 - 1843 .
沈波 , 吴勉华 , 李国春 . Logistic回归分析在中医药研究中的应用 [J ] . 辽宁中医杂志 , 2010 , 37 ( 10 ): 2076 - 2077 .
SHEN B , WU M H , LI G C . Application of Logistic regression analysis in the study of traditional Chinese medicine [J ] . Liaoning J Tradit Chin Med , 2010 , 37 ( 10 ): 2076 - 2077 .
国家药典委员会 . 中华人民共和国药典:四部 [M ] . 2020年版. 北京 : 中国医药科技出版社 , 2020 :232, 234 , 480 - 483 .
National Pharmacopoeia Commission . Pharmacopoeia of the People’s Republic of China:part Ⅳ [M ] . 2020 edition. Beijing : China Medical Science and Technology Press , 2020 :232, 234 , 480 - 483 .
沈洁 , 王琴 , 熊维建 , 等 . HPLC-一测多评法测定参芪延肾颗粒中淫羊藿药材中的6个黄酮类成分的含量 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2019 , 30 ( 17 ): 2327 - 2331 .
SHEN J , WANG Q , XIONG W J , et al . Content determination of 6 flavonoids in Epimedium brevicornu from Shenqi yanshen granules based on HPLC-QAMS [J ] . China Pharm , 2019 , 30 ( 17 ): 2327 - 2331 .
刘凯丽 , 刘艳之 , 王世晖 , 等 . 一测多评法结合指纹图谱和化学模式识别分析在西黄丸质量评价中的应用 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2022 , 33 ( 18 ): 2219 - 2223 .
LIU K L , LIU Y Z , WANG S H , et al . Application of quantitative analysis of multi-components by single marker combined with fingerprint and chemical pattern recognition analysis in the quality evaluation of Xihuang pills [J ] . China Pharm , 2022 , 33 ( 18 ): 2219 - 2223 .
李文基 , 马骏 , 赵文秀 . 皂角刺抗肿瘤药理作用及化学成分研究进展 [J ] . 甘肃中医药大学学报 , 2020 , 37 ( 6 ): 85 - 88 .
LI W J , MA J , ZHAO W X . Antineoplastic pharmacological effects of Gleditsiae Spina [J ] . J Gansu Univ Chin Med , 2020 , 37 ( 6 ): 85 - 88 .
田吉 , 何兵 , 李翅翔 , 等 . HPLC法测定皂角刺提取物中槲皮素的含量 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2009 , 20 ( 15 ): 1156 - 1157 .
TIAN J , HE B , LI C X , et al . Determination of quercetin in extracts of Gleditsia sinensis by HPLC [J ] . China Pharm , 2009 , 20 ( 15 ): 1156 - 1157 .
杨骏鹏 , 梁犇 , 邱莹 , 等 . 皂荚叶异牡荆素提取及抗氧化、抗菌性能研究 [J ] . 粮食与油脂 , 2024 , 37 ( 2 ): 144 - 150 .
YANG J P , LIANG B , QIU Y , et al . Study on the extraction,antioxidant and antibacterial properties of isovitexin from Gleditsia sinensis Lam. leaves [J ] . Cereals Oils , 2024 , 37 ( 2 ): 144 - 150 .
张慧 , 余静 . 漆黄素对哮喘小鼠气道炎症及Th1/Th2失衡的影响 [J ] . 生物技术 , 2023 , 33 ( 4 ): 494 - 499 .
ZHANG H , YU J . Effects of fisetin on airway inflammation and Th1/Th2 imbalance in asthmatic mice [J ] . Biotechnology , 2023 , 33 ( 4 ): 494 - 499 .
王金淼 , 池军 , 江雪 , 等 . 皂角刺药材和饮片质量标准研究 [J ] . 中国中药杂志 , 2021 , 46 ( 17 ): 4417 - 4423 .
WANG J M , CHI J , JIANG X , et al . Quality standards of Gleditsiae Spina and its decoction pieces [J ] . China J Chin Mater Med , 2021 , 46 ( 17 ): 4417 - 4423 .
朱志明 , 王娟娟 , 王苏美 , 等 . 山柰酚抗肿瘤作用的药理研究进展 [J ] . 中药新药与临床药理 , 2024 , 35 ( 3 ): 445 - 452 .
ZHU Z M , WANG J J , WANG S M , et al . Pharmacological research progress for anti-tumor effect of kaempferol [J ] . Tradit Chin Drug Res Clin Pharmacol , 2024 , 35 ( 3 ): 445 - 452 .
李楠 , 包文芳 , 宋刚 . HPLC法对皂荚属植物中刺囊酸的含量测定 [J ] . 沈阳药科大学学报 , 2001 , 18 ( 3 ): 198 - 200 .
LI N , BAO W F , SONG G . The quantitative determination of echinocystic acid in Gleditsia L. by HPLC [J ] . J Shenyang Pharm Univ , 2001 , 18 ( 3 ): 198 - 200 .
0
Views
73
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution