- Journal Information
- Archive
- Submission
- For Reviewers
- Statement and Policies
- 个人中心
- 退出登录
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
- Journal Information
- Journal Introduction
- Editorial Board
- Youth Editorial Board
- Editorial Board Charter
- Subscriptions
- Archive
- Current Issue
- Past Issues
- Priority Publication
- Virtual Collection
- Recommended Articles
- Submission
- Submission Process
- Submission Guidelines
- Download
- Contact us
- For Reviewers
- Guidelines for Reviewers
- Peer Reviewed Policies
- Statement and Policies
- Ethics and Malpractice
- Research Ethics Policies
- Repetition Detection
- Corrections and Retractions
- Editorial Policies
- Open Access Statement
- Website Responsibility
Guidelines for topic selection for comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs
- ZHONGGUO YAOFANG Vol. 36, Issue 8, Pages: 897-902(2025)
- 作者机构：
- 作者简介：
- 基金信息：
DOI：10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.08.01
CLC： R95Received：07 January 2025，
Revised：2025-03-19，
Accepted：19 March 2025，
Published：30 April 2025
- 稿件说明：
移动端阅览
.药品临床综合评价主题遴选指南 [J].中国药房,2025,36(08):897-902.
.Guidelines for topic selection for comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(08):897-902.
.药品临床综合评价主题遴选指南 [J].中国药房,2025,36(08):897-902. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.08.01.
.Guidelines for topic selection for comprehensive clinical evaluation of drugs[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(08):897-902. DOI： 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.08.01.
摘要
目的
2
为促进药品临床综合评价工作的规范、高质开展，提升综合评价证据的质量和应用转化价值提供参考。
方法
2
遵循美国国家科学院医学研究所关于指南的最新定义，并以世界卫生组织标准指南制定的方法学为依据进行指南制定。采用德尔菲法构建主题遴选评估指标体系，并采用层次分析法对各级指标进行权重赋值；应用循证医学方法建立研究证据，采用中国循证医学中心的证据分级体系进行证据分级评价，通过专家共识法形成推荐意见。
结果
2
形成的《药品临床综合评价主题遴选指南》涵盖主题遴选组织管理、主题遴选评审流程、主题遴选评估方法3个部分，其中主题遴选评估指标体系包括5个一级指标、9个二级指标、17个三级指标。
结论
2
本指南的制定，为药品临床综合评价拟开展的主题研究工作提供了标准化遴选工具，有助于提升评价质量、促进评价结果转化，支持卫生决策科学化。
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
2
To promote the standardized and high-quality development of comprehensive clinical drug evaluation， and enhance the quality of comprehensive evaluation evidence and its application transformation value.
METHODS
2
The guidelines were formulated in accordance with the latest definition of guidelines provided by the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences and based on the methodology established by the World Health Organization standard guidelines. An index system for topic selection was constructed using the Delphi method， and weights for each index were assigned through the analytic hierarchy process. Research evidence was established following the principles of evidence-based medicine. The evidence grading evaluation was conducted using the evidence grading system of the China Evidence-Based Medicine Center， and recommendation opinions were formed via expert consensus.
RESULTS
2
Guidelines for Topic Selection for Comprehensive Clinical Evaluation of Drugs
（hereinafter referred to as
“
the Guidelines”） were successfully developed， encompassing the organization and management of topic selection， review processes， and evaluation methods. The evaluation index system for topic selection was established， comprising 5 primary indexes， 9 secondary indexes， and 17 tertiary indexes.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The development of the Guidelines provides a standardized topic selection tool for the proposed research work of clinical comprehensive evaluation of drugs， enhances the quality of evaluations， facilitates result transformation， and supports scientific health decision-making.
关键词
Keywords
references
国家卫生健康委 . 国家卫生健康委关于开展药品使用监测和临床综合评价工作的通知：国卫药政函 〔2019〕 80 号[EB/OL ] .（ 2019-04-09 ）[ 2024-09-22 ] . http：//www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/pqt/201904/31149bb1845e4c019a04f30c0d69c2-c9.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/pqt/201904/31149bb1845e4c019a04f30c0d69c2-c9.shtml .
国家卫生健康委 ， 教育部 ， 财政部 ， 等 . 关于印发加强医疗机构药事管理促进合理用药的意见的通知：国卫医发 〔2020〕 2 号[EB/OL ] .（ 2020-02-26 ）[ 2024-09-22 ] . http：//www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202002/ea3b96d1ac094c47-a1fc39cf00f3960e.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202002/ea3b96d1ac094c47-a1fc39cf00f3960e.shtml .
国家卫生健康委办公厅 . 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于规范开展药品临床综合评价工作的通知：国卫办药政发 〔2021〕 16 号[EB/OL ] .（ 2021-07-28 ）[ 2024-09-22 ] . http：//www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/s2908/202107/532e20800a47415-d84adf3797b0f4869.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/s2908/202107/532e20800a47415-d84adf3797b0f4869.shtml .
Institute of Medicine Committee on Standards for Deve-loping Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines ， GRAHAM R ， MANCHER M ， et al . Clinical practice guidelines we can trust [M ] . Washington，D.C. ： National Academies Press ， 2011 ： 57 - 104 .
世界卫生组织 . 世界卫生组织指南制定手册 [M ] . 杨克虎，主译. 兰州 ： 兰州大学出版社 ， 2013 ： 9 - 72 .
SINCLAIR D ， ISBA R ， KREDO T ， et al . World Health Organization guideline development：an evaluation [J ] . PLoS One ， 2013 ， 8 （ 5 ）： e63715 .
BROUWERS M C ， KERKVLIET K ， SPITHOFF K ， et al . The AGREE reporting checklist：a tool to improve repor-ting of clinical practice guidelines [J ] . BMJ ， 2016 ， 352 ： i1152 .
CHEN Y L ， YANG K H ， MARUŠIC A ， et al . A reporting tool for practice guidelines in health care：the RIGHT statement [J ] . Ann Intern Med ， 2017 ， 166 （ 2 ）： 128 - 132 .
李正翔 ， 张玉 ， 张伶俐 ， 等 . 医疗机构药品遴选指南 [J ] . 中国药房 ， 2022 ， 33 （ 7 ）： 769 - 776 .
邱英鹏 ， 赵琨 ， 王晓玲 ， 等 . 儿童药品临床综合评价主题的遴选方法初探 [J ] . 中国药物评价 ， 2021 ， 38 （ 3 ）： 177 - 182 .
BLAAUW D ， CHAMBERS C ， CHIRWA T ， et al . Introducing an ethics framework for health priority-setting in South Africa on the path to universal health coverage [J ] . S Afr Med J ， 2022 ， 112 （ 3 ）： 240 - 244 .
MOBINIZADEH M ， MOHAMADI E ， ARMAN H ， et al . Topic selection for health technology assessment：an approach combining multiple attribute decision making and decision rules [J ] . Med J Islam Repub Iran ， 2021 ， 35 ： 40 .
KOSHERBAYEVA L ， HAILEY D ， KURAKBAEV K ， et al . A process of prioritizing topics for health technology assessment in Kazakhstan [J ] . Int J Technol Assess Health Care ， 2016 ， 32 （ 3 ）： 147 - 151 .
MOBINIZADEH M ， RAEISSI P ， NASIRIPOUR A A ， et al . A model for priority setting of health technology assessment：the experience of AHP-TOPSIS combination approach [J ] . Daru ， 2016 ， 24 ： 10 .
JANKAUSKIENE D ， PETRONYTE G . A model for HTA priority setting：experience in Lithuania [J ] . Int J Technol Assess Health Care ， 2013 ， 29 （ 4 ）： 450 - 455 .
YOUNGKONG S ， BALTUSSEN R ， TANTIVESS S ， et al . Multicriteria decision analysis for including health interventions in the universal health coverage benefit pac-kage in Thailand [J ] . Value Health ， 2012 ， 15 （ 6 ）： 961 - 970 .
BASTIAN H ， SCHEIBLER F ， KNELANGEN M ， et al . Choosing health technology assessment and systematic review topics：the development of priority-setting criteria for patients’ and consumers’ interests [J ] . Int J Technol Assess Health Care ， 2011 ， 27 （ 4 ）： 348 - 356 .
HUSEREAU D ， BOUCHER M ， NOORANI H . Priority setting for health technology assessment at CADTH [J ] . Int J Technol Assess Health Care ， 2010 ， 26 （ 3 ）： 341 - 347 .
WHITLOCK E P ， LOPEZ S A ， CHANG S ， et al . AHRQ series paper 3：identifying，selecting，and refining topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews：AHRQ and the effective healthcare program [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol ， 2010 ， 63 （ 5 ）： 491 - 501 .
MENON D ， STAFINSKI T . Engaging the public in priority-setting for health technology assessment：findings from a citizens’ jury [J ] . Health Expect ， 2008 ， 11 （ 3 ）： 282 - 293 .
CARLSSON P . Health technology assessment and priority setting for health policy in Sweden [J ] . Int J Technol Assess Health Care ， 2004 ， 20 （ 1 ）： 44 - 54 .
OORTWIJN W J ， VONDELING H ， VAN BARNEVELD T ， et al . Priority setting for health technology assessment in the Netherlands：principles and practice [J ] . Health Policy ， 2002 ， 62 （ 3 ）： 227 - 242 .
SHANI S ， SIEBZEHNER M I ， LUXENBURG O ， et al . Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level：the Israeli experience [J ] . Health Policy ， 2000 ， 54 （ 3 ）： 169 - 185 .
DONALDSON M S ， SOX H C . Setting priorities for health technology assessment：a model process [M ] . Washington，D.C. ： National Academy Press ， 1992 ： 84 - 87 .
Agency for Care Effectiveness . Process & methods [EB/OL ] .[ 2023-07-08 ] . https：//www.ace-hta.gov.sg/resources/process-methods https://www.ace-hta.gov.sg/resources/process-methods .
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality . EHC program topic nomination and selection [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-08 ] . https：//effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/about/epc/nomination https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/about/epc/nomination .
The Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health . Topic identification and prioritization process [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-13 ] . https：//www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/HTA_OU_Topic_ID_and_Prioritization_Process.pdf https://www.cadth.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/HTA_OU_Topic_ID_and_Prioritization_Process.pdf .
European Network for Health Technology Assessment . Topic identification，selection and prioritisation [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-07 ] . https：//www.eunethta.eu/ja3services/horizon-scanning/ https://www.eunethta.eu/ja3services/horizon-scanning/ .
Health Intervention and Technology Assessment Program . Health technology assessment process guidelines [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-13 ] . https：//www.hitap.net/en/documents/21282 https://www.hitap.net/en/documents/21282 .
Health Technology Wales . Our appraisal process [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-10 ] . https：//healthtechnology.wales/about/our-appraisal-process/ https://healthtechnology.wales/about/our-appraisal-process/ .
Institute for Clinical & Economic Review . A guide to ICER’s methods for health technology assessment [EB/OL ] .[ 2023-07-10 ] . https：//icer.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ICER_HTA_Guide_102720.pdf https://icer.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/ICER_HTA_Guide_102720.pdf .
German Drug Evaluation Agency . Themencheck medizin：thema vorschlagen [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-10 ] . https：//www.iqwig.de/sich-einbringen/themencheck-medizin/formular-themenvorschlag/ https://www.iqwig.de/sich-einbringen/themencheck-medizin/formular-themenvorschlag/ .
Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre . Topic selection for the annual programme KCE [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-14 ] . https：//kce.fgov.be/en/submit-a-topic/topic-selection-for-the-annual-programme https://kce.fgov.be/en/submit-a-topic/topic-selection-for-the-annual-programme .
Health Technology Assessment Section . Health techno-logy assessment [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-14 ] . https：//www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/HTA_MANUAL_MAHTAS.pdf https://www.moh.gov.my/moh/resources/HTA_MANUAL_MAHTAS.pdf .
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . NICE health technology evaluation topic selection：the manual [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-10 ] . https：//www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg37/chapter/about-this-guide https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg37/chapter/about-this-guide .
Swedish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Assessment of Social Services . Selection of topics [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-10 ] . https：//www.sbu.se/en/about-sbu/selection-of-topics/ https://www.sbu.se/en/about-sbu/selection-of-topics/ .
Swiss Federal Office of Public Health . HTA programme [EB/OL ] . [ 2023-07-10 ] . https：//www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/versicherungen/krankenversicherung/krankenversi-cherung-leistungen-tarife/hta/hta-programm.html https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/en/home/versicherungen/krankenversicherung/krankenversi-cherung-leistungen-tarife/hta/hta-programm.html .
0
Views
59
下载量
0
CSCD
- L-PDFDownload
- WORDDownload
- Meta-XMLDownload
- BibTeXDownload
- EndnoteDownload
- RefMan Download
- NoteExpressDownload
- NoteFirstDownload
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution
- Address：8th Floor, Sihuan Building, No. 129 Daping Main Street, Yuzhong District, Chongqing, China Postal code：400042
- Technical support is provided by Beijing Founder Electronics co., LTD 渝ICP备15012710号
公网安备50010302001817 - It is recommended to read the content of this site in Chrome&IE9+. Please switch to extreme mode in browser 360.
- Cookies We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content. By continuing, you agree to the use of cookies.