浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.武汉大学人民医院药学部,武汉 430060
2.武汉大学药学院,武汉 430070
Received:29 November 2024,
Revised:2025-03-31,
Accepted:01 April 2025,
Published:15 June 2025
移动端阅览
吴玥,沈秉正,张帆,等.直接口服抗凝药用于肿瘤相关静脉血栓预防的临床综合评价体系研究 [J].中国药房,2025,36(11):1384-1388.
WU Yue,SHEN Bingzheng,ZHANG Fan,et al.Clinical comprehensive evaluation framework for direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(11):1384-1388.
吴玥,沈秉正,张帆,等.直接口服抗凝药用于肿瘤相关静脉血栓预防的临床综合评价体系研究 [J].中国药房,2025,36(11):1384-1388. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.11.17.
WU Yue,SHEN Bingzheng,ZHANG Fan,et al.Clinical comprehensive evaluation framework for direct oral anticoagulants in the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(11):1384-1388. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.11.17.
目的
2
构建直接口服抗凝药(DOACs)用于肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞(CAVTE)预防的临床综合评价体系,为CAVTE的合理防治、抗凝药物宏观管理策略的制定及调整提供支持和参考。
方法
2
通过文献检索,收集整理评价指标,初步建立指标池;以指标重要性评分均值≥3.5及变异系数(CV)<0.25为筛选指标,通过两轮德尔菲法开展评价指标遴选,采用层次分析法(AHP)最终明确指标权重。
结果
2
两轮专家咨询的权威程度(
C
r
)分别为0.877、0.943,CV分别为0.24、0.18,Kendall协调系数分别为0.331、0.535(
P
<0.05)。经两轮专家咨询论证,最终将6个一级指标及46个二级指标纳入评价体系。一级指标及权重排序依次为“有效性”(38.86%)、“安全性”(38.86%)、“经济性”(10.67%)、“可及性”(5.51%)、“适宜性”(3.48%)、“创新性”(2.64%)。二级指标组合权重范围为0.02%~20.25%,排前5位的依次为“颅内大出血发生率”(20.25%)、“全因死亡风险的降低”(15.29%)、“肺栓塞发生率的降低”(8.82%)、“深静脉血栓发生率的降低”(7.25%)和“药物使用禁忌证”(4.74%)。
结论
2
本研究建立了权威、科学、可靠的DOACs用于CAVTE预防的药品临床综合评价体系。
OBJECTIVE
2
To establish a clinical comprehensive evaluation framework for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the prevention of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism (CAVTE), providing a methodological reference for the rational prevention and treatment of CAVTE as well as for the formulation and adjustment of macro-management strategies for anticoagulant drugs.
METHODS
2
Through literature retrieval, evaluation indicators were collected and organized to establish a preliminary indicator pool. The selection of evaluation indicators was carried out through two rounds of Delphi surveys using average score of indicator importance≥3.5 and a coefficient of variation (CV) <0.25 as the screening criteria. Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to finalize the indicator weights.
RESULTS
2
The authority levels (
C
r
) of the two rounds of expert consultations were 0.877 and 0.943, with CV of 0.24 and 0.18, respect
ively. The Kendall concordance coefficients were 0.331 and 0.535 (
P
<0.05). After expert validation, six primary indicators and forty-six secondary indicators were finalized for inclusion in the evaluation framework. The primary indicators and their weightings, ranked in descending order, were as follows: “effectiveness” (38.86%), “safety” (38.86%), “cost-effectiveness” (10.67%), “accessibility” (5.51%), “suitability” (3.48%), and “innovation” (2.64%). The secondary indicators exhibited a weight range from 0.02% to 20.25%, with the top five secondary indicators being: “incidence of intracranial hemorrhage” (20.25%), “reduction in all-cause mortality” (15.29%), “decrease in the incidence of pulmonary embolism” (8.82%), “reduction in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis” (7.25%), and “drug contraindications” (4.74%).
CONCLUSIONS
2
This study has established an authoritative, scientific, and reliable comprehensive clinical evaluation framework for the use of DOACs in the prevention of CAVTE.
STREIFF M B , HOLMSTROM B , ANGELINI D , et al . Cancer-associated venous thromboembolic disease,version 2.2021,NCCN clinical practice guidelines in onco- logy [J ] . J Natl Compr Canc Netw , 2021 , 19 ( 10 ): 1181 - 1201 .
KHORANA A A , DALAL M , LIN J , et al . Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among ambulatory high-risk cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in the United States [J ] . Cancer , 2013 , 119 ( 3 ): 648 - 655 .
KHORANA A A , FRANCIS C W , CULAKOVA E , et al . Thromboembolism is a leading cause of death in cancer patients receiving outpatient chemotherapy [J ] . J Thromb Haemost , 2007 , 5 ( 3 ): 632 - 634 .
CHEW H K , WUN T , HARVEY D , et al . Incidence of venous thromboembolism and its effect on survival among patients with common cancers [J ] . Arch Intern Med , 2006 , 166 ( 4 ): 458 - 464 .
CHEW H K , WUN T , HARVEY D J , et al . Incidence of venous thromboembolism and the impact on survival in breast cancer patients [J ] . J Clin Oncol , 2007 , 25 ( 1 ): 70 - 76 .
马军 , 秦叔逵 , 吴一龙 , 等 . 肿瘤相关静脉血栓栓塞症预防与治疗指南: 2019版 [J ] . 中国肿瘤临床 , 2019 , 46 ( 13 ): 653 - 660 .
ROUSSEAU A , VAN D P , KHATERCHI A , et al . Procoagulant microparticles derived from cancer cells have determinant role in the hypercoagulable state associated with cancer [J ] . Int J Oncol , 2017 , 51 ( 6 ): 1793 - 1800 .
DESHPANDE S P , HENDERSON R A , AJITH A U , et al . Cancer-related coagulopathy and perioperative considera- tions [J ] . Anesth Analg , 2025 , 140 ( 4 ): 860 - 872 .
STEVENS S M , WOLLER S C , KREUZIGER L B , et al . Antithrombotic therapy for VTE disease:second update of the CHEST guideline and expert panel report [J ] . Chest , 2021 , 160 ( 6 ): e545 - e608 .
CARRIER M , ABOU-NASSAR K , MALLICK R , et al . Apixaban to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2019 , 380 ( 8 ): 711 - 719 .
KHORANA A A , SOFF G A , KAKKAR A K , et al . Riva- roxaban for thromboprophylaxis in high-risk ambulatory patients with cancer [J ] . N Engl J Med , 2019 , 380 ( 8 ): 720 - 728 .
FARGE D , FRERE C , CONNORS J M , et al . 2022 international clinical practice guidelines for the treatment and prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer,including patients with COVID-19 [J ] . Lancet Oncol , 2022 , 23 ( 7 ): e334 - e347 .
PAPADOPOULOS V , TSAPAKIDIS K , MARKOU A , et al . New prophylaxis strategies to reduce the risk of thromboembolism in cancer [J ] . Expert Rev Anticancer Ther , 2021 , 21 ( 10 ): 1135 - 1144 .
国家卫生健康委员会药物政策与基本药物制度司 . 国家卫生健康委办公厅关于规范开展药品临床综合评价工作的通知 [EB/OL ] .( 2021-07-28 )[ 2024-11-28 ] . http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/s2908/202107/532e20800a47415-d84adf3797b0f4869.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yaozs/s2908/202107/532e20800a47415-d84adf3797b0f4869.shtml .
国家药物和卫生技术评估中心 . 心血管病药品临床综合评价技术指南:2022年版试行 [EB/OL ] .( 2022-06-29 )[ 2024-11-28 ] . http://www.nhei.cn/nhei/znfb/202206/c01d- 87a290664b01bf42a9dad769d69f/files/d4c3a96d751f44d4-a78a8979ccf97cf6.pdf http://www.nhei.cn/nhei/znfb/202206/c01d-87a290664b01bf42a9dad769d69f/files/d4c3a96d751f44d4-a78a8979ccf97cf6.pdf .
陆唯怡 , 张舒娴 , 马冲 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法的机构健康科普工作评价指标体系构建研究 [J ] . 中国全科医学 , 2025 , 28 ( 18 ): 2307 - 2313 .
王璐 , 曾露 , 郭洁茹 , 等 . 基于德尔菲法和层次分析法构建钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂治疗2型糖尿病的综合评价体系 [J ] . 临床药物治疗杂志 , 2024 , 22 ( 3 ): 68 - 72 .
季新强 , 刘志民 . Delphi法及其在医学研究和决策中的应用 [J ] . 中国药物依赖性杂志 , 2006 , 15 ( 6 ): 422 - 426 .
戴泽琦 , 景城阳 , 吴雪 , 等 . 国内外药品临床综合评价指标体系研究的系统评价 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2023 , 23 ( 7 ): 776 - 782 .
0
Views
16
下载量
0
CSCD
Publicity Resources
Related Articles
Related Author
Related Institution