浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
安庆市立医院药事管理科,安徽 安庆 246000
主管药师。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:1271812933@qq.com
主任药师。研究方向:临床药学、药事管理。E-mail:454914464@qq.com
收稿日期:2024-09-06,
修回日期:2024-11-04,
录用日期:2025-02-14,
纸质出版日期:2025-04-15
移动端阅览
王栓,黄灿,齐腊梅.伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流病有效性、安全性及经济性的快速卫生技术评估 [J].中国药房,2025,36(07):794-800.
WANG Shuan,HUANG Can,QI Lamei.Rapid health technology assessment of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(07):794-800.
王栓,黄灿,齐腊梅.伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流病有效性、安全性及经济性的快速卫生技术评估 [J].中国药房,2025,36(07):794-800. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.07.05.
WANG Shuan,HUANG Can,QI Lamei.Rapid health technology assessment of efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(07):794-800. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.07.05.
目的
2
采用快速卫生技术评估方法,评价伏诺拉生(VPZ)治疗胃食管反流病的有效性、安全性和经济性,为临床决策提供依据。
方法
2
计算机检索PubMed、Medline、Cochrane Library、中国知网、维普、万方等中英文数据库,以及国内外卫生技术评估机构官网,检索时限从建库起至2024年8月,由2位研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的质量后,对结果进行定性描述与分析。
结果
2
共纳入21篇文献,包括系统评价/Meta分析15篇和药物经济学研究6篇。有效性方面,与对照方案(不同剂量VPZ、安慰剂、其他阳性对照药或联合治疗)相比,VPZ(主要为20 mg/d VPZ)显著提高了治疗总有效率、第2周的黏膜愈合率、症状缓解率和愈合后第12、24周的维持率(
P
<0.05);当内镜下洛杉矶分级为C/D时,VPZ有效率显著高于对照方案(
P
<0.05)。安全性方面,VPZ与对照方案治疗GERD的不良事件发生率无显著差异(
P
>0.05),但长期使用VPZ导致血清胃泌素升高及肝功能异常的风险较对照方案更高(
P
<0.05)。经济性方面,与雷贝拉唑、兰索拉唑、艾司奥美拉唑相比,VPZ更具有成本-效用/成本-效果优势。
结论
2
VPZ治疗胃食管反流病具有良好的有效性、安全性、经济性。
OBJECTIVE
2
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of vonoprazan (VPZ) in the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) by rapid health technology assessment, and provide evidence for clinical decision-making.
METHODS
2
English and Chinese databases including PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang data as well as the official websites of domestic and international health technology assessment agencies were searched by computer from the database establishment to August 2024. After literature screening, data extraction and quality evaluation of included studies were conducted by two researchers, the results were described and analyzed qualitatively.
RESULTS
2
A total of 21 pieces of literature were included, involving 15
systematic reviews/meta-analyses and 6 pharmacoeconomic studies. In terms of efficacy, compared with the control regimen (different doses of VPZ, placebo, other positive controls or combination therapy), VPZ (mainly 20 mg/d VPZ) significantly improved the total response rate, mucosal healing rate at 2nd week, symptom remission rate, and maintenance rate at 12th and 24th week after mucosal healing (
P
<0.05); when the endoscopic Los Angeles classification was C/D, the effective rate of VPZ was significantly higher than that of the control regimen (
P
<0.05). In terms of safety, there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between VPZ and the control regimen for GERD treatment (
P
>0.05), but the risk of elevated serum gastrin and abnormal liver function caused by long-term use of VPZ was higher than that of the control regimen (
P
<0.05). In terms of cost-effectiveness, compared with rabeprazole, lansoprazole and esomeprazole, VPZ had a cost-effectiveness/cost-utility advantage.
CONCLUSIONS
2
VPZ is effective, safe and cost-effective in the treatment of GERD.
中华中医药学会脾胃病分会 . 胃食管反流病中医诊疗专家共识:2023 [J ] . 中医杂志 , 2023 , 64 ( 18 ): 1935 - 1944 .
常虹 , 高洁 , 张梦 , 等 . 孟德尔随机化方法在探索胃食管反流病中的研究进展 [J ] . 现代消化及介入诊疗 , 2023 , 28 ( 7 ): 904 - 908 .
KIYOTOKI S , NISHIKAWA J , SAKAIDA I . Efficacy of vonoprazan for Helicobacter pylori eradication [J ] . Intern Med , 2020 , 59 ( 2 ): 153 - 161 .
刘方旭 , 许乐 , 郑松柏 . 老年人胃食管反流病中国专家共识:2023 [J ] . 中华医学会杂志 , 2023 , 42 ( 8 ): 883 - 896 .
陈旻湖 , 李延青 , 肖英莲 , 等 . 中国胃食管反流病诊疗规范 [J ] . 胃肠病学 , 2023 , 28 ( 10 ): 597 - 607 .
叶冬炜 , 王莉 , 刘叔文 . 卫生技术评估在欧洲4国的应用及对我国的启示 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2022 , 33 ( 1 ): 1 - 6 .
杨健筌 , 李爽 , 郭文 , 等 . 质子泵抑制剂联合康复新液对比质子泵抑制剂单药治疗反流性食管炎的Meta分析 [J ] . 中成药 , 2016 , 38 ( 2 ): 265 - 271 .
张方圆 , 沈傲梅 , 曾宪涛 , 等 . 系统评价方法学质量评价工具AMSTAR 2解读 [J ] . 中国循证心血管医学杂志 , 2018 , 10 ( 1 ): 14 - 18 .
HUSEREAU D , DRUMMOND M , AUGUSTOVSKI F , et al . Consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) 2022 explanation and elaboration:a report of the ISPOR CHEERS Ⅱ good practices task force [J ] . Value Health , 2022 , 25 ( 1 ): 10 - 31 .
张梦然 , 庞铭歌 . 伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流病的疗效及安全性随机对照试验Meta分析 [J ] . 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志 , 2023 , 32 ( 5 ): 551 - 557 .
娄伦生 , 黄玉荣 , 何磊 , 等 . 伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流病的疗效Meta分析 [J ] . 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志 , 2022 , 9 ( 2 ): 95 - 102 .
唐嘉曦 , 国梦然 , 樊天斐 , 等 . 伏诺拉生治疗胃食管反流有效性和安全性的Meta分析 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2023 , 34 ( 6 ): 735 - 739,745 .
李勉力 , 张伟健 , 郭玲珑 , 等 . 沃诺拉赞对比质子泵抑制剂治疗反流性食管炎有效性和安全性的Meta分析 [J ] . 中国全科医学 , 2021 , 24 ( 6 ): 712 - 717 .
谢星星 , 余志刚 , 刘学 , 等 . 沃诺拉赞与兰索拉唑对照治疗糜烂性食管炎的系统评价 [J ] . 中南药学 , 2022 , 20 ( 9 ): 2185 - 2190 .
SIMADIBRATA D M , LESMANA E , FASS R . A systema-tic review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of vonoprazan for proton pump inhibitor-resistant gastroesophageal reflux disease [J ] . J Gastroenterol Hepatol , 2024 , 39 ( 5 ): 796 - 805 .
SIMADIBRATA D M , LESMANA E , PRATAMA M I A , et al . A systematic review with meta-analysis:efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blocker compared with proton pump inhibitor in the maintenance of healed erosive esophagitis [J ] . JGH Open , 2024 , 8 ( 3 ): e13053 .
GONG H Y , HAN D , LIU S , et al . Adverse events of vonoprazan in the treatments of acid-related diseases:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Rev Esp Enferm Dig , 2023 , 115 ( 6 ): 294 - 300 .
ZHUANG Q J , CHEN S F , ZHOU X Y , et al . Comparative efficacy of P-CAB vs. proton pump inhibitors for grade C/D esophagitis:a systematic review and network meta-analysis [J ] . Am J Gastroenterol , 2024 , 119 ( 5 ): 803 - 813 .
CHENG Y , LIU J L , TAN X , et al . Direct comparison of the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan versus proton-pump inhibitors for gastroesophageal reflux disease:a syste- matic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Dig Dis Sci , 2021 , 66 ( 1 ): 19 - 28 .
OSHIMA T , IGARASHI A , NAKANO H , et al . Network meta-analysis comparing vonoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for heartburn symptoms in erosive esophagitis [J ] . J Clin Gastroenterol , 2022 , 56 ( 6 ): 493 - 504 .
HE J , GAO Y Y , BAI G , et al . Network meta-analysis of multiple doses of vonoprazan for the treatment of erosive esophagitis [J ] . J Comp Eff Res , 2023 , 12 ( 8 ): e220165 .
BANDYOPADHYAY S , VERMA P , SAMAJDAR S S , et al . Vonoprazan causes symptomatic improvement in non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease:a systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol , 2024 , 48 ( 6 ): 102373 .
CHANDAN S , DELIWALA S , MOHAN B P , et al . Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole in erosive esophagitis:a syste- matic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J ] . Indian J Gastroenterol , 2023 , 42 ( 4 ): 475 - 484 .
谷静 , 陈丰运 , 刘纯伦 . 沃诺拉赞与质子泵抑制剂治疗反流性食管炎有效性比较 [J ] . 中国处方药 , 2023 , 21 ( 3 ): 17 - 21 .
彭杰 , 凌柏 . 富马酸伏诺拉生片与雷贝拉唑肠溶胶囊治疗胃食管反流病的效果及药物经济学分析 [J ] . 中国社区医师 , 2023 , 39 ( 36 ): 43 - 45 .
朱怀平 , 刘守珠 , 王健 , 等 . 胃食管反流患者应用富马酸伏诺拉生片与雷贝拉唑肠溶胶囊的疗效及药物经济学评价 [J ] . 河北医药 , 2024 , 46 ( 2 ): 264 - 266 .
HABU Y . Vonoprazan versus lansoprazole for the initial treatment of reflux esophagitis:a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan [J ] . Intern Med , 2019 , 58 ( 17 ): 2427 - 2433 .
WANG Z H , SUN R , SHENG Y N , et al . Cost-effectiveness analysis of vonoprazan versus proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of reflux esophagitis in China [J ] . Ann Transl Med , 2022 , 10 ( 8 ): 480 .
YOKOYA Y , IGARASHI A , UDA A , et al . Cost-utility analysis of a ‘vonoprazan-first’ strategy versus ‘esomeprazole- or rabeprazole-first’ strategy in GERD [J ] . J Gastroenterol , 2019 , 54 ( 12 ): 1083 - 1095 .
HABU Y , HAMASAKI R , MARUO M , et al . Treatment strategies for reflux esophagitis including a potassium-competitive acid blocker:a cost-effectiveness analysis in Japan [J ] . J Gen Fam Med , 2021 , 22 ( 5 ): 237 - 245 .
HUNT R , ARMSTRONG D , KATELARIS P , et al . World Gastroenterology Organisation global guidelines:GERD global perspective on gastroesophageal reflux disease [J ] . J Clin Gastroenterol , 2017 , 51 ( 6 ): 467 - 478 .
中华医学会 , 中华医学会杂志社 , 中华医学会消化病学分会 , 等 . 胃食管反流病基层诊疗指南:2019年 [J ] . 中华全科医师杂志 , 2019 , 18 ( 7 ): 635 - 641 .
中华医学会消化病学分会 . 2020年中国胃食管反流病专家共识 [J ] . 中华消化杂志 , 2020 , 40 ( 10 ): 649 - 663 .
翟晓晓 . 富马酸伏诺拉生辅助治疗胃食管反流病的效果 [J ] . 实用中西医结合临床 , 2024 , 24 ( 14 ): 13 - 15,82 .
HARUMA K , KINOSHITA Y , YAO T , et al . Randomised clinical trial:3-year interim analysis results of the VISION trial to evaluate the long-term safety of vonoprazan as maintenance treatment in patients with erosive oesophagitis [J ] . BMC Gastroenterol , 2023 , 23 ( 1 ): 139 .
0
浏览量
34
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构