浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.甘肃中医药大学中医临床学院,兰州 730000
2.甘肃省人民医院感染管理科,兰州 730000
3.甘肃省中医院内分泌科,兰州 730050
4.西昌市中医院治未病科,四川 西昌 615000
5.兰州大学循证医学中心,兰州 730000
住院医师,博士研究生。研究方向:中医药治疗糖尿病视网膜病变。E-mail:2276299207@qq.com
主任医师,博士生导师,博士。研究方向:中医药治疗眼底病。E-mail:279089608@qq.com
收稿日期:2024-09-03,
修回日期:2025-01-09,
录用日期:2025-01-10,
纸质出版日期:2025-04-15
移动端阅览
令娟,谢卓霖,罗向霞等.基于证据体质量评价的中医药治疗糖尿病视网膜病变效果分析 Δ[J].中国药房,2025,36(07):863-866.
LING Juan,XIE Zhuolin,LUO Xiangxia,et al.Analysis of the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine for diabetic retinopathy based on evidence body quality assessment[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(07):863-866.
令娟,谢卓霖,罗向霞等.基于证据体质量评价的中医药治疗糖尿病视网膜病变效果分析 Δ[J].中国药房,2025,36(07):863-866. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.07.17.
LING Juan,XIE Zhuolin,LUO Xiangxia,et al.Analysis of the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine for diabetic retinopathy based on evidence body quality assessment[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(07):863-866. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.07.17.
目的
2
基于证据质量分级和推荐强度(GRADE)系统对中医药治疗糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的系统评价/Meta分析进行证据体质量评价。
方法
2
检索中英文数据库获取中医药治疗DR的系统评价/Meta分析的相关研究,检索时限均为各数据库建库起至2024年1月13日。根据纳排标准进行文献筛选,提取纳入文献相关资料后,采用GRADE系统对纳入研究的证据体质量等级进行评价,并对结局指标的证据进行整合总结。
结果
2
最终纳入51篇文献,结局指标共计135个,19个(14.1%)为高质量、87个(64.4%)为中等质量、26个(19.3%)为低质量、3个(2.2%)为极低质量,总体而言,纳入研究的结局指标证据质量为中等偏低。结局指标疗效的证据整合结果显示,与西医常规治疗、羟苯磺酸钙或安慰剂相比,中医药在提高总有效率、减少出血斑面积、降低黄斑中心凹厚度以及提高视力改善率等方面具有优势。此外,中医药联合西医常规治疗或羟苯磺酸钙的效果显著优于单独使用西医常规治疗或羟苯磺酸钙。
结论
2
中医药治疗DR的系统评价/Meta分析研究的证据体质量整体为中等偏低质量水平;基于已有研究结果,中医药治疗DR具有较好的临床疗效。
OBJECTIVE
2
To evaluate the quality of evidence in the systematic evaluation/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) for diabetes retinopathy (DR) based on the GRADE system.
METHODS
2
Chinese and English databases were searched to obtain the relevant studies of systematic evaluation/meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of DR. The search time was from the establishment of each database to January 13th,
2024. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, literature screening was conducted. After extracting relevant information from the included literature, the GRADE system was used to evaluate the quality level of the evidence body in the included studies, and the evidence of the outcome indicators was integrated and summarized.
RESULTS
2
A total of 51 studies were ultimately included, encompassing 135 outcome indexes. Among these, 19 indicators (14.1%) were of high quality, 87 (64.4%) were of medium quality, 26 (19.3%) were of low quality, and 3 (2.2%) were of very low quality. Overall, the evidence quality of the outcome indicators in the included studies was medium to low quality. The integrated results of evidence on the efficacy of outcome indexes showed that compared with conventional Western medicine, calcium dobesilate or placebo, TCM had significant advantages in improving overall efficacy, reducing bleeding spot area, reducing macular foveal thickness, and increasing visual improvement rate. In addition, the combination of TCM and conventional Western medicine or calcium dobesilate was significantly more effective than using conventional Western medicine or calcium dobesilate alone.
CONCLUSIONS
2
The overall quality of the evidence in the systematic evaluation/meta-analysis study on the treatment of DR with TCM is medium to low quality. Based on existing research findings, TCM demonstrates good clinical efficacy in the treatment of DR.
TEO Z L , THAM Y C , YU M , et al . Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045:systematic review and meta-analysis [J ] . Ophthalmology , 2021 , 128 ( 11 ): 1580 - 1591 .
GUYATT G , OXMAN A D , AKL E A , et al . GRADE guidelines:1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol , 2011 , 64 ( 4 ): 383 - 394 .
高一城 , 冯玉婷 , 曹蕊 , 等 . 多源证据体在中医药循证临床实践指南中的整合运用 [J ] . 中国中西医结合杂志 , 2023 , 43 ( 10 ): 1253 - 1257 .
高一城 , 刘芷含 , 曹蕊 , 等 . 中医药循证临床实践指南多源证据体的构建 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2023 , 23 ( 6 ): 731 - 737 .
陈耀龙 , 姚亮 , Susan Norris , 等 . GRADE在系统评价中应用的必要性及注意事项 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2013 , 13 ( 12 ): 1401 - 1404 .
GUYATT G H , OXMAN A D , VIST G , et al . GRADE guidelines:4:rating the quality of evidence:study limitations (risk of bias) [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol , 2011 , 64 ( 4 ): 407 - 415 .
GUYATT G H , OXMAN A D , KUNZ R , et al . GRADE guidelines:7:rating the quality of evidence:inconsistency [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol , 2011 , 64 ( 12 ): 1294 - 1302 .
GUYATT G H , OXMAN A D , KUNZ R , et al . GRADE guidelines:6:rating the quality of evidence:imprecision [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol , 2011 , 64 ( 12 ): 1283 - 1293 .
GUYATT G , OXMAN A , KUNZ R , 等 . GRADE指南:Ⅵ:证据质量评价:不精确性(随机误差) [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2011 , 11 ( 12 ): 1435 - 1443 .
杨智荣 , 武珊珊 , 董圣杰 , 等 . 网络Meta分析研究进展系列:二十:网络Meta分析的样本量计算及精确性评估 [J ] . 中国循证心血管医学杂志 , 2022 , 14 ( 1 ): 1 - 5 .
夏芸 , 孙瑛 , 刘兆兰 , 等 . 系统综述或Meta分析的样本量估算:试验序贯分析 [J ] . 北京中医药大学学报(中医临床版) , 2013 , 20 ( 5 ): 31 - 33 .
GUYATT G H , OXMAN A D , KUNZ R , et al . GRADE guidelines:8:rating the quality of evidence:indirectness [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol , 2011 , 64 ( 12 ): 1303 - 1310 .
GUYATT G H , OXMAN A D , MONTORI V , et al . GRADE guidelines:5:rating the quality of evidence:publication bias [J ] . J Clin Epidemiol , 2011 , 64 ( 12 ): 1277 - 1282 .
王琪 , 王建成 , 潘蓓 , 等 . 网状Meta分析证据质量分级:GRADE方法学前沿与进展 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2020 , 20 ( 8 ): 979 - 985 .
杨楠 , 肖淑君 , 周奇 , 等 . GRADE在网状Meta分析中应用的基本原理和方法介绍 [J ] . 中国循证医学杂志 , 2016 , 16 ( 5 ): 598 - 603 .
DERSIMONIAN R , KACKER R . Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials:an update [J ] . Contemp Clin Trials , 2007 , 28 ( 2 ): 105 - 114 .
袁崇智 , 徐寒松 . 浅论糖尿病视网膜病变的中医病机 [J ] . 贵阳中医学院学报 , 2014 , 36 ( 1 ): 41 - 43 .
令娟 , 胡梅 , 王燕 , 等 . 中医药干预糖尿病视网膜病变的证据图谱分析 [J ] . 中国中药杂志 , 2024 , 49 ( 13 ): 3676 - 3683 .
0
浏览量
0
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构