
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
四川大学华西医院临床药学部,成都 610041
主管药师,硕士研究生。研究方向:临床药学。E-mail:476245291@qq.com
主任药师,博士。研究方向:临床药学、医院药学。 E-mail:fbwu2013@163.com
收稿日期:2024-12-01,
修回日期:2025-04-16,
录用日期:2025-04-16,
纸质出版日期:2025-05-30
移动端阅览
孙闻续,游欣月,江弦,等.驻科药师制度下主动式出院带药医嘱审核和用药教育服务模式研究 [J].中国药房,2025,36(10):1243-1247.
SUN Wenxu,YOU Xinyue,JIANG Xian,et al.Research on proactive pharmaceutical service model of discharge medication order review and medication education under resident pharmacist system[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(10):1243-1247.
孙闻续,游欣月,江弦,等.驻科药师制度下主动式出院带药医嘱审核和用药教育服务模式研究 [J].中国药房,2025,36(10):1243-1247. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.10.16.
SUN Wenxu,YOU Xinyue,JIANG Xian,et al.Research on proactive pharmaceutical service model of discharge medication order review and medication education under resident pharmacist system[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2025,36(10):1243-1247. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2025.10.16.
目的
2
构建主动式出院带药医嘱审核和用药教育服务的药学服务模式(以下简称“主动式药学服务模式”),并评价其效果。
方法
2
回顾性收集我院风湿免疫科2023年1-6月和2024年1-6月出院的患者资料。按患者接受药学服务模式的不同将2024年1-6月出院的患者归为干预组(489例),2023年1-6月出院的患者归为对照组(535例)。对照组患者接受传统药学服务模式,干预组患者在对照组基础上接受主动式药学服务模式。比较两组患者的主要结局指标[出院带药品种数、用药错误及不良药物相互作用(DDI)发生情况]和随访结局指标(因无法耐受而调整用药方案、非计划入院、出院后主动寻求药学服务情况);记录主动式药学服务模式患者的出院带药医嘱审核情况、多重用药患者的不良DDI发生情况及床旁用药教育情况。
结果
2
2024年1-6月,累计完成住院患者出院带药医嘱审核1 052例次,发现用药错误174例次;579例患者出现多重用药,发生率为55.04%;多重用药患者的不良DDI发生率显著高于非多重用药患者(
P
<0.001);药师完成居家用药错误高风险患者带药指导394例次。干预组患者的出院带药品种数,用药错误、用药与诊断不符、用法用量错误、不良DDI及因无法耐受而调整用药方案发生率均显著低于对照组(
P
<0.05),出院后主动寻求药学服务发生率显著高于对照组(
P
<0.05);两组患者的非计划入院发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。
结论
2
所建主动式药学服务模式有效降低了患者的用药错误,提高了患者对药学服务的认可度,保障了患者居家用药的安全性。
OBJECTIVE
2
To develop a pharmaceutical service model for discharge medication order review and medication education (hereinafter referred to as the “proactive pharmaceutical service model”), and evaluate its effects.
METHODS
2
The data of discharged patients were collected retrospectively from Rheumatology and Immunology Department of our hospital during January to June 2023 and January to June 2024. Patients discharged from January to June 2024 were classified as the intervention group (489 cases), while patients discharged from January to June 2023 were classified as the control group (535 cases) based on the different pharmaceutical service models they received. The control group received traditional service model, and the intervention group additionally got proactive pharmaceutical service model based on the control group. The primary outcome measures [the number of discharge medications, the number of medication errors, and the occurrence of adverse drug-drug interaction (DDI)] and follow-up outcome measures (the adjustment of medication regimen due to intolerance, unplanned hospital admissions, and proactive seeking of pharmaceutical services after discharge) were compared between the two groups. The discharge medication order review status, the occurrence of adverse DDI in patients with polypharmacy, and bedside medication education status for patients receiving the proactive pharmaceutical service model were all recorded.
RESULTS
2
From January to June 2024, a total of 1 052 discharge medication order review for inpatients were reviewed, and 174 instances of medication errors were identified. Polypharmacy was observed in 579 patients, with an incidence rate of 55.04%. The incidence of adverse DDI was significantly higher in patients with polypharmacy compared to those without polypharmacy (
P
<0.001). Pharmacists completed medication guidance for 394 instances of high-risk patients prone to the incidence rate of medication errors at home. The number of discharge medications, the incidence rate of medication errors, instances of medication not matching the diagnosis, dosage and administration errors, adverse DDI, and the incidence rate of patients who required adjustment of medication regimen due to intolerance were all significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the control group (
P
<0.05). Additionally, the incidence rate of patients who proactive
seeking of pharmaceutical services after discharge was significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (
P
<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the incidence rate of unplanned hospital admissions between the two groups (
P
>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
2
The established proactive pharmaceutical service model can reduce medication errors, enhance patient recognition of pharmaceutical services, and ensure medication safety for discharged patients at home.
国家卫生健康委医政司 . 关于开展驻科药师工作模式试点的通知(国卫医政医疗便函 〔2023〕246号)[EB/OL ] .( 2023-09-27 )[ 2024-11-12 ] . https://www.sohu.com/a/751784598_121124545?scm https://www.sohu.com/a/751784598_121124545?scm = 1102 .xchannel: 325 : 1000 - 02 .0. 6 .0.
国家卫生健康委 . 中国卫生健康统计年鉴:2022 [EB/OL ] .( 2023-05-17 )[ 2024-11-12 ] . http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202305/6ef68aac6bd14c1eb9375e-01a0faa1fb/files/b05b3d958fc546d98261d165cea4adba.pdf http://www.nhc.gov.cn/mohwsbwstjxxzx/tjtjnj/202305/6ef68aac6bd14c1eb9375e-01a0faa1fb/files/b05b3d958fc546d98261d165cea4adba.pdf .
李若雨 , 刘鑫 , 林萍 , 等 . 出院患者用药安全管理的最佳证据总结 [J ] . 护理学报 , 2025 , 32 ( 3 ): 50 - 55 .
陈淑清 , 阮淑芳 , 曾荷花 . 药师药学服务对精神科出院患者用药依从性与满意度的影响 [J ] . 临床合理用药 , 2023 , 16 ( 31 ): 144 - 146 .
PÉREZ-JOVER V , MIRA J J , CARRATALA-MUNUERA C , et al . Inappropriate use of medication by elderly,polymedicated,or multipathological patients with chronic diseases [J ] . Int J Environ Res Public Health , 2018 , 15 ( 2 ): 310 .
SCHER M S . Interdisciplinary fetal-neonatal neurology training applies neural exposome perspectives to neuro-logy principles and practice [J ] . Front Neurol , 2024 , 14 : 1321674 .
马慧艳 , 赵志刚 , 乔春凤 , 等 . 中国城镇老年慢性病患者居家安全用药现状调查与影响因素分析:一项基于全国多中心的研究 [J ] . 中南药学 , 2024 , 22 ( 10 ): 2696 - 2701 .
中国医院协会 . 医疗机构药事管理与药学服务 第 2 - 1 部分:临床药学服务 药学门诊:T/CHAS 20 - 2 - 1 — 2021 [EB/OL ] .( 2021-10-13 ). [ 2024-11-12 ] . http://yiyao.inoad.com.cn/html/pdfreader/?file http://yiyao.inoad.com.cn/html/pdfreader/?file = http://yiyao.inoad.com.cn/uploadfile/2024/0715/20240715024145813.pdf http://yiyao.inoad.com.cn/uploadfile/2024/0715/20240715024145813.pdf .
国家卫生健康委办公厅 . 关于印发医疗机构药学门诊服务规范等5项规范的通知 [EB/OL ] .( 2021-11-20 )[ 2024-11-12 ] . http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202110/f76f-c77acd87458f950c86d7bc468f22.shtml http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7659/202110/f76f-c77acd87458f950c86d7bc468f22.shtml .
NAM S H , OH J S , HONG S , et al . Early discontinuation of tofacitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis co-treated with rifampin for latent tuberculosis [J ] . Joint Bone Spine , 2020 , 87 ( 5 ): 475 - 479 .
AGRAWAL A , AGARWAL S K , KALEEKAL T , et al . Rifampicin and anti-hypertensive drugs in chronic kidney disease:pharmacokinetic interactions and their clinical impact [J ] . Indian J Nephrol , 2016 , 26 ( 5 ): 322 - 328 .
LANGE N W , SALERNO D M , JENNINGS D L , et al . Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir use:managing clinically significant drug-drug interactions with transplant immunosuppressants [J ] . Am J Transplant , 2022 , 22 ( 7 ): 1925 - 1926 .
MIGLIOZZI D R , ASAL N J . Clinical controversy in transplantation:tacrolimus versus cyclosporine in statin drug interactions [J ] . Ann Pharmacother , 2020 , 54 ( 2 ): 171 - 177 .
NARECHANIA S , MALESKER M A . Drug interactions associated with therapies for pulmonary arterial hypertension [J ] . J Pharm Technol , 2022 , 38 ( 6 ): 349 - 359 .
魏婷 , 都赛飞 , 刘斌 , 等 . 质子泵抑制剂预防药物性消化道损伤的临床指南/共识、系统评价/Meta分析再评价 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2021 , 32 ( 17 ): 2122 - 2128 .
CHIANG J Y , CHEN P C , YANG Y H , et al . Digoxin-amiodarone combination is associated with excess all-cause mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation [J ] . Sci Rep , 2020 , 10 ( 1 ): 4101 .
曹桂萍 , 徐媛 . 1例抗黑色素瘤分化相关基因5自身抗体阳性皮肌炎合并间质性肺病患者联用托法替布和伏立康唑的剂量方案调整及文献复习 [J ] . 世界临床药物 , 2021 , 42 ( 12 ): 1135 - 1139 .
张璠璠 , 李华茵 , 蔡映云 , 等 . 临床药师参与1例氟康唑致他克莫司血药浓度升高患者管理的药学监护 [J ] . 上海医药 , 2019 , 40 ( 15 ): 82 - 84,112 .
沈杰 , 高宁舟 , 郑松柏 , 等 . 老年人多重用药评估与管理中国专家共识:2024 [J ] . 中华老年医学杂志 , 2024 , 43 ( 3 ): 269 - 278 .
王可 , 王子民 , 褚燕琦 , 等 . 系统辅助人工审核的出院带药审核模式的应用 [J ] . 临床药物治疗杂志 , 2022 , 20 ( 1 ): 63 - 66 .
魏娜 , 吴朝阳 , 陈伦灼 , 等 . 基于循证证据的我院出院带药处方前置审核系统的运行实践 [J ] . 中国药房 , 2020 , 31 ( 15 ): 1910 - 1915 .
KULAWIAK J , JACOBSON J L , MILLER J A , et al . Evaluation of a pharmacist-driven discharge medication reconciliation service pilot at a children’s hospital [J ] . J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther , 2024 , 29 ( 5 ): 530 - 538 .
ZHENG L D , PON T , BAJOREK S , et al . Impact of pharmacist-led discharge medication reconciliation on error and patient harm prevention at a large academic medical center [J ] . J Am Coll Clin Pharm , 2024 , 7 ( 8 ): 787 - 794 .
国家卫生健康委办公厅 . 全面推动卫生健康事业高质量发展 筑牢中国式现代化卫生健康根基 [EB/OL ] .( 2024-01-12 )[ 2024-11-12 ] . https://www.jkb.com.cn/news/industryNews/2024/0115/492775.html https://www.jkb.com.cn/news/industryNews/2024/0115/492775.html .
闫婷 , 伍琳 , 熊抚辰 , 等 . 医疗机构药学服务收费政策落地的关键挑战及优化策略 [J ] . 卫生经济研究 , 2025 , 42 ( 3 ): 51 - 54,58 .
MISAU Y A , MOGERE D , MBARUK S , et al . Educational interventions for antibiotics misuse and self-medication in Africa:a systematic review and meta-analysis [protocol [J ] . West Afr J Med , 2023 , 40 ( 1 ): 114 - 120 .
李广润 , 谷清 . 2 490例专业药学问题咨询统计与分析 [J ] . 中国医院用药评价与分析 , 2020 , 20 ( 12 ): 1520 - 1523,1526 .
金知萍 , 左成淳 , 许青 , 等 . 临床药师在规范肺癌化疗患者不良反应自我管理中的作用 [J ] . 中国临床药学杂志 , 2020 , 29 ( 2 ): 117 - 121 .
0
浏览量
37
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
公网安备50010302001817