OBJECTIVE： To systematically evaluate the difference in therapeutic efficacy， safety and cardiac function of Chinese patent medicine injection for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis combined with routine treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention （PCI）， and to provide evidence-based reference for clinical drug use. METHODS： Retrieved from Cochrane library， PubMed， Embase， CNKI， Wanfang database and Chinese sci-tech periodicals database， RCTs about different Chinese patent medicine injection for promoting blood circulation and removing blood stasis combined with routine treatment （trial group） versus routine treatment （control group） after PCI were collected. After screening the literature and extracting the data， the quality of the included studies was evaluated by modified Jadad scale. Bayesian network Meta- analysis was performed by using Stata 14.0 software and Markov Chain-Monte Carlo method. RESULTS： A total of 15 RCTs involving 1 364 patients were included， involving Salvia miltiorrhiza injection， Puerarin injection， Yiqi fumai injection， Xuebijing injection， Shenfu injection， Shuxuetong injection， Salvia miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection， Rhodiola wallichiana injection， Danhong injection. Results of Meta-analysis showed that in the aspect of improving total response rate of ECG， 8 kinds of intervention measures were involved；compared with control group， 7 kinds of intervention measures could improve the total response rate of ECG of trial group except for Shenfu injection （P＞0.05）； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that S. miltiorrhiza injection＞Puerarin injection＞Shenfu injection＞S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection＞Shuxuetong injection＞R. wallichiana injection＞ Danhong injection＞routine treatment. In terms of reducing adverse cardiovascular events （MACE） incidence，8 kinds of intervention measures were involved； compared with control group， 7 kinds of intervention measures could reduce the MACE incidence of trial group except for Puerarin injection （P＞0.05）； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection＞Danhong injection＞Xuebijing injection＞Shuxuetong injection＞S. miltiorrhiza injection＞R. wallichiana injection＞ Puerarin injection＞routine treatment. In terms of improving left ventricular ejection fraction （LVEF） after treatment， 8 kinds of intervention measures were involved； compared with control group， 7 intervention measures could significantly improve LVEF after treatment of trial group except for R. wallichiana injection (P＞0.05）； network Meta-analysis ranking showed that S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection＞Yiqi fumai injection＞Danhong injection＞Shenfu injection＞S. miltiorrhiza injection＞Shuxuetong injection＞R. wallichiana injection＞routine treatment. CONCLUSIONS： Compared with routine treatment， S. miltiorrhiza injection is the best in improving total response rate of ECG； S. miltiorrhiza and ligustrazine injection is the best in reducing MACE incidence and improving LVEF after treatment.