
浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
目的:比较我国与美国执业药师制度,为提高我国药学服务质量和促进公众用药安全提供参考。方法:检索中国知网和万方数据库中近10年的相关研究文献,比较美国和我国执业药师在法律地位、准入资格、法律义务和责任方面的不同,提出完善我国执业药师制度的建议。结果与结论:当前我国执业药师制度存在的问题主要是法律地位不高、准入门槛较低、法律义务和责任不明确;而美国执业药师制度经过上百年的发展,形成了较为严密的法律体系,美国药房理事会颁布《标准州药房法》对执业药师的准入资格、法律义务和责任进行了明确详尽的规定,各州药房法以此为蓝本制定。鉴于我国当前国情,有必要借鉴美国的上述经验,对我国执业药师的法律地位、准入资格、法律义务和责任予以完善,以提升我国药学服务质量。
OBJECTIVE: To compare the licensed pharmacist system in China and the USA, and to provide reference for improving pharmaceutical care and promoting public safety of drug use in China. METHODS: The relevant literatures in recent 10 years were retrieved from CJFD and Wanfang database. The differences of legal status, access qualification, legal obligations and responsibilities of licensed pharmacists in the USA and China were compared, and suggestions on improving the licensed pharmacists system in China were put forward. RESULTS & CONCLUSIONS: At present, the problems of licensed pharmacist system in China are mainly that the legal status is not high, the access threshold is low, the legal obligations and responsibilities are not clear. However, the licensed pharmacist system in the USA has been developed for a century and formed a relatively strict legal system. Model State Pharmacy Act promulgated by National Association of Boards of Pharmacy in USA has clearly defined the access qualifications, legal obligations and responsibilities of licensed pharmacists. The pharmacy acts of the states were enacted on its blueprint. In view of current problems in China, it is necessary to learn from the above experience of the USA to improve the legal status, access qualification, legal obligations and responsibilities of licensed pharmacists and the quality of pharmaceutical care.
执业药师法律地位准入资格法律义务法律责任美国
Licensed pharmacistLegal statusAccess qualificationLegal obligationLegal responsibilityUSA
0
浏览量
24
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构
公网安备50010302001817