浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院临床药学科,南京 210002
2.南京医科大学药学院,南京 210029
3.中国人民解放军东部战区总医院科研训练科,南京 210002
药师,硕士。研究方向:循证药学。电话:025-80863493。E-mail:1196008514@qq.com
主管药师,博士研究生。研究方向:临床药学。电话:025-80863493。E-mail:carolmeng_0813@163.com
纸质出版日期:2022-12-30,
收稿日期:2022-06-06,
修回日期:2022-11-07,
扫 描 看 全 文
周强,臧月月,陶瑛瑛等.新型口服抗凝药对比华法林用于左心室血栓有效性和安全性的Meta分析 Δ[J].中国药房,2022,33(24):3034-3039.
ZHOU Qiang,ZANG Yueyue,TAO Yingying,et al.Efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: a meta-analysis[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(24):3034-3039.
周强,臧月月,陶瑛瑛等.新型口服抗凝药对比华法林用于左心室血栓有效性和安全性的Meta分析 Δ[J].中国药房,2022,33(24):3034-3039. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.24.18.
ZHOU Qiang,ZANG Yueyue,TAO Yingying,et al.Efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for left ventricular thrombus: a meta-analysis[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2022,33(24):3034-3039. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2022.24.18.
目的
2
比较新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)与华法林用于左心室血栓的有效性和安全性,为临床合理用药提供循证参考。
方法
2
计算机检索PubMed、Cochrane Library、Embase、Ovid Medline、中国知网、万方数据和维普网,检索时限为各数据库建库起至2022年3月。筛选文献、提取资料后,采用Cochrane系统评价员手册推荐的5.3.0偏倚风险评估工具评价随机对照研究(RCT)的质量,采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评价队列研究的质量;采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析及发表偏倚分析。
结果
2
共纳入13项研究,包括2项RCT、11项队列研究,合计2 261例患者。Meta分析结果显示,两组患者的血栓完全溶解率[OR=1.05,95%CI(0.81,1.37),
P
=0.71]、脑卒中/系统性栓塞发生率[OR=0.89,95%CI(0.67,1.18),
P
=0.42]、大出血发生率[OR=0.61,95%CI(0.19,1.97),
P
=0.41]、再住院发生率[OR=0.84,95%CI(0.49,1.46),
P
=0.54]、全因死亡率[OR=0.93,95%CI(0.56,1.56),
P
=0.79]比较,差异均无统计学意义;试验组患者的任何出血事件发生率显著低于对照组[OR=0.65,95%CI(0.45,0.93),
P
=0.02]。亚组分析结果显示,试验组患者中随访时间≤6个月的血栓完全溶解率显著高于对照组,随访时间>6个月和欧洲地区患者的任何出血事件发生率显著低于对照组(
P
<0.05);随访时间>6个月的血栓完全溶解率、亚洲和美洲地区患者的任何出血事件发生率、RCT和队列研究中两组患者的任何出血事件发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。发表偏倚分析结果显示,血栓完全溶解率方面存在发表偏倚的可能性较小,而任何出血事件发生率方面存在发表偏倚可能性较大。
结论
2
NOACs早期能更快地消退血栓,但随着抗凝时间的延长,NOACs与华法林的疗效相当,且NOACs在任何出血事件方面的安全性优于华法林。
OBJECTIVE
2
To compare the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT), and to provide evidenced-based reference for rational drug use in clinic.
METHODS
2
Retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Ovid Medline, CNKI, Wanfang and VIP during the inceptions to March 2022, after screening the literature and extracting data, the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was evaluated by using bias risk evaluation tool recommended by Cochrane systematic evaluator manual. Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of cohort studies, and RevMan 5.3 software was used for meta-analysis and bias risk analysis.
RESULTS
2
A total of 13 studies were included in the analysis, including 2 RCTs, 11 cohort studies and 2 261 patients; results of meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical significance in the incidence of complete LVT resolution [OR=1.05, 95%CI(0.81,1.37),
P
=0.71], the incidence of stroke/systemic embolism [OR=0.89, 95%CI(0.67,1.18),
P
=0.42], the incidence of massive haemorrhage [OR=0.61, 95%CI(0.19,1.97),
P
=0.41], the incidence of rehospitalization [OR=0.84, 95%CI(0.49,1.46),
P
=0.54] or all-cause mortality [OR=0.93, 95%CI(0.56,1.56),
P
=0.79] between 2 groups. The incidence of any bleeding event in trial group was significantly lower than that control group[OR=0.65, 95%CI(0.45,0.93),
P
=0.02]. Subgroup analysis showed that complete LVT resolution of patients with follow-up ≤6 months in trial group was significantly higher than control group, and the incidence of any bleeding event was significantly lower in patients with follow-up >6 months and in the European region than control group (
P
<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of complete LVT resolution in patients with follow-up>6 months, the incidence of any bleeding event in patients from Asia and America, or the incidence of any bleeding event in the two groups included in the RCT or the cohort study (
P
>0.05). The publication bias analysis showed that publication bias was less likely in the rate of complete LVT resolution but more likely in the incidence of any bleeding event.
CONCLUSIONS
2
NOACs can eliminate thrombus faster in the early stage, but with the prolongation of anticoagulation time, the efficacy of NOACs is comparable to warfarin, and the safety of NOACs in any bleeding event is better than warfarin.
左心室血栓华法林新型口服抗凝药有效性安全性
warfarinnew oral anticoagulantsefficacysafety
STRATTON J R,RESNICK A D. Increased embolic risk in patients with left ventricular thrombi[J]. Circulation,1987,75(5):1004-1011.
ASINGER R W,MIKELL F L,ELSPERGER J,et al. Incidence of left-ventricular thrombosis after acute transmural myocardial infarction. Serial evaluation by two-dimensional echocardiography[J]. N Engl J Med,1981,305(6):297-302.
HINDRICKS G,POTPARA T,DAGRES N,et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery(EACTS):the Task Force for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation of the European Society of Car-diology(ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the European Heart Rhythm Association(EHRA)of the ESC[J]. Eur Heart J,2021,42(5):373-498.
KERNAN W N,OVBIAGELE B,BLACK H R,et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack:a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association[J]. Stroke,2014,45(7):2160-2236.
张珠博,任静,门剑龙,等. 口服抗凝药的实验监测[J]. 中华心血管病杂志,2019,47(10):846-850.
COULIS A A,MACKEY W C. A review of the efficacy and safety profiles of the novel oral anticoagulants in the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism[J]. Clin Ther,2018,40(12):2140-2167.
姚自鹏,尹琼,吴安爽,等. 新型口服抗凝剂治疗心室血栓有效性和安全性的Meta分析[J]. 实用心脑肺血管病杂志,2021,29(7):105-109.
ABDELAZIZ H K,MEGALY M,DEBSKI M,et al. Meta-analysis comparing direct oral anticoagulants to vitamin K antagonists for the management of left ventricular thrombus[J]. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther,2021,19(5):427-432.
GUSTO INVESTIGATORS. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction[J]. N Engl J Med,1993,329(10):673-682.
MEHRAN R,RAO S V,BHATT D L,et al. Standardized bleeding definitions for cardiovascular clinical trials:a consensus report from the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium[J]. Circulation,2011,123(23):2736-2747.
SCHULMAN S,KEARON C,Subcommittee on Control of Anticoagulation of the Scientific and Standardization Committee of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Definition of major bleeding in clinical investigations of antihemostatic medicinal products in non-surgical patients[J]. J Thromb Haemost,2005,3(4):692-694.
HIGGINS J P T,ALTMAN D G,GØTZSCHE P C,et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials[J]. BMJ,2011,343:d5928.
STANG A,Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses[J]. Eur J Epidemiol,2010,25(9):603-605.
ZHANG Z F,SI D Y,ZHANG Q,et al. Rivaroxaban versus Vitamin K Antagonists(warfarin)based on the triple therapy for left ventricular thrombus after ST-Elevation myocardial infarction[J]. Heart Vessels,2022,37(3):374-384.
王鹏,赵玉洁,任杰. 利伐沙班、华法林对急性心肌梗死合并左心室血栓患者的疗效观察[J]. 血栓与止血学,2022,28(3):774-775.
ABDELNABI M,SALEH Y,FAREED A,et al. Comparative study of oral anticoagulation in left ventricular thrombi(no-LVT trial)[J]. J Am Coll Cardiol,2021,77(12):1590-1592.
ALCALAI R,BUTNARU A,MORAVSKY G,et al. Apixaban vs.warfarin in patients with left ventricular thrombus:aprospective multicentre randomized clinical trial[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother,2022,8(7):660-667.
WILLEFORD A,ZHU W H,STEVENS C,et al. Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus[J]. Ann Pharmacother,2021,55(7):839-845.
姚艳,崔晶,王悦,等. 新型口服抗凝药对心力衰竭合并左心室血栓患者的疗效研究[J]. 中国循环杂志,2021,36(4):379-382.
MIHM A E,HICKLIN H E,CUNHA A L,et al. Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis[J]. Intern Emerg Med,2021,16(8):2313-2317.
XU Z,LI X M,LI X W,et al. Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus[J]. Ann Palliat Med,2021,10(9):9427-9434.
ROBINSON A A,TRANKLE C R,EUBANKS G,et al. Off-label use of direct oral anticoagulants compared with warfarin for left ventricular thrombi[J]. JAMA Cardiol,2020,5(6):685-692.
JONES D A,WRIGHT P,ALIZADEH M A,et al. The use of novel oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonists(warfarin)in patients with left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction[J]. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother,2021,7(5):398-404.
IQBAL H,STRAW S,CRAVEN T P,et al. Direct oral anticoagulants compared to vitamin K antagonist for the management of left ventricular thrombus[J]. ESC Heart Fail,2020,7(5):2032-2041.
GUDDETI R R,ANWAR M,WALTERS R W,et al. Treatment of left ventricular thrombus with direct oral anticoagulants:aretrospective observational study[J]. Am J Med,2020,133(12):1488-1491.
BASS M E,KISER T H,PAGE R L,et al. Comparative effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombus[J]. J Thromb Thrombolysis,2021,52(2):517-522.
MANIWA N,FUJINO M,NAKAI M,et al. Anticoagulation combined with antiplatelet therapy in patients with left ventricular thrombus after first acute myocardial infarction[J]. Eur Heart J,2018,39(3):201-208.
MCCARTHY C P,VADUGANATHAN M,MCCARTHY K J,et al. Left ventricular thrombus after acute myocardial infarction:screening,prevention,and treatment[J]. JAMA Cardiol,2018,3(7):642-649.
SALEIRO C,LOPES J,DE CAMPOS D,et al. Left ventricular thrombus therapy with direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther,2021,26(3):233-243.
CHEN R Z,ZHOU J Y,LIU C,et al. Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for patients with left ventricular thrombus:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Pol Arch Intern Med,2021,131(5):429-438.
TRONGTORSAK A,THANGJUI S,KEWCHAROEN J,et al. Direct oral anticoagulants vs. vitamin K antagonists for left ventricular thrombus:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Cardiol,2021,76(9):933-942.
0
浏览量
6
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构