浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.广州医科大学附属第二医院药学部,广州 510260
2.广州医科大学附属第二医院重症医学科,广州 510260
3.中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院药学部,广州 510030
4.惠阳三和医院药学部,广东 惠州 516211
主管药师,硕士。研究方向:临床药学。电话:020-34152376。E-mail:phdloveyou@163.com
主任药师,硕士生导师。研究方向:临床药学、药事管理。电话:020-34152377。E-mail:wangruolun@126.com
纸质出版日期:2023-07-15,
收稿日期:2022-11-07,
修回日期:2023-06-16,
扫 描 看 全 文
彭怀东,张瑞昌,郭诗静等.个体化给药方案对重症患者万古霉素血药谷浓度和肾功能的影响 Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(13):1611-1616.
PENG Huaidong,ZHANG Ruichang,GUO Shijing,et al.Effects of individualized dosing regimen on blood trough concentration of vancomycin and renal function in critically ill patients[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(13):1611-1616.
彭怀东,张瑞昌,郭诗静等.个体化给药方案对重症患者万古霉素血药谷浓度和肾功能的影响 Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(13):1611-1616. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.13.13.
PENG Huaidong,ZHANG Ruichang,GUO Shijing,et al.Effects of individualized dosing regimen on blood trough concentration of vancomycin and renal function in critically ill patients[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(13):1611-1616. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.13.13.
目的
2
考察个体化给药方案对重症患者万古霉素血药谷浓度(以下简称“谷浓度”)和肾功能的影响。
方法
2
临床药师参考相关指南推荐和Vancomycin Calculator软件计算结果,以体质量和肌酐清除率为自变量制定包含了负荷剂量和维持剂量的重症患者万古霉素个体化给药方案。采用回顾性研究方法,选取2018年7月-2021年12月入住广州医科大学附属第二医院重症医学科使用该方案的患者作为试验组,将该科室2015年1月-2018年6月应用万古霉素治疗并行血药浓度监测的患者作为对照组,比较2组患者万古霉素谷浓度的分布差异和用药后急性肾损伤(AKI)的发生率,并分析试验组患者血肌酐的变化情况。
结果
2
试验组纳入197例患者,对照组纳入144例患者。2组患者的性别、年龄、体质量、急性生理学及慢性健康状况评分系统Ⅱ评分、慢性肾功能不全患者占比等临床资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。2组患者主要的感染部位(包括肺部、尿路、腹腔、血流、中枢神经系统)占比和治疗类型(目标治疗/经验性治疗)占比的差异均无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。2组患者万古霉素理想谷浓度(15~20 μg/mL)的达标率和谷浓度>20 μg/mL的患者占比差异均无统计学意义(
P
>0.05),而目标谷浓度(10~20 μg/mL)的达标率和谷浓度<10 μg/mL的患者占比差异均有统计学意义(
P
<0.05)。试验组合并慢性肾功能不全患者目标谷浓度的达标率显著高于对照组(
P
<0.05)。2组患者用药后AKI的发生率、万古霉素相关AKI的发生率差异均无统计学意义(
P
>0.05)。用药时间≥7 d的试验组患者在用药第7天时的血肌酐水平较用药第3天时显著升高(
P
<0.05)。
结论
2
该个体化给药方案能够提高重症患者尤其是合并慢性肾功能不全的重症患者万古霉素首次规范监测时目标谷浓度的达标率,且与既往经验性用药相比不增加重症患者肾损伤的风险。
OBJECTIVE
2
To investigate the effects of individualized dosing regimen on blood trough concentration of vancomycin and renal function in critically ill patients.
METHODS
2
According to relevant guidelines and the results of Vancomycin Calculator, clinical pharmacists formulated an individualized dosing regimen of vancomycin including loading dose and maintenance dose for critically ill patients based on the two independent variables of body weight and creatinine clearance rate. Using the method of retrospective study, patients who were admitted to the department of intensive care unit (ICU) of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University and used the regimen from July 2018 to December 2021 were selected as the trial group, and patients who were treated with vancomycin and received blood drug concentration monitoring in ICU from January 2015 to June 2018 were recruited in the control group. The difference in trough concentration distribution and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) after medication were compared between the two groups, the change of serum creatinine before and after medication in the trial group was analyzed.
RESULTS
2
Totally 197 patients were included in the trial group and 144 patients were in the control group. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the clinical information (gender, age, body weight, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation Ⅱ score, the proportion of patients with renal insufficiency, etc.) (
P
>0.05). The proportions of major infection sites (including lung, urinary, abdominal, blood and central nervous system) and treatment type (target or empirical treatment) also had no significant difference between the two groups (
P
>0.05). There was no significant difference in the attainment rate of ideal trough concentration (15-20 μg/mL) and the proportion of patients with trough concentration >20 μg/mL between the two groups (
P
>0.05), while the attainment rate of target trough concentration (10-20 μg/mL) and the proportion of patients with trough concentration <10 μg/mL were significantly different between the two groups (
P
<0.05). The attainment rate of target trough concentration in patients with chronic renal insufficiency in trial group was significantly higher than that in control group (
P
<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI and vancomycin-associated AKI between the two groups (
P
>0.05). In the trial group with medication duration ≥7 days , the level of serum creatinine on the 7th day of treatment was increased significantly, compared with that on the 3rd day of treatment (
P
<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
2
This individualized dosing regimen can improve the attainment rate of target trough concentration of vancomycin in critically ill patients, especially those with chronic renal insufficiency, during the first standardized monitoring, and not increase the risk of renal injury compared with previous empirical medication.
万古霉素重症患者个体化给药方案治疗药物监测血药谷浓度肾功能
critically ill patientsindividualized dosing regimentherapeutic drug monitoringblood trough concentrationrenal function
ZHANG Y W,YAO Z Y,ZHAN S Y,et al. Disease burden of intensive care unit-acquired pneumonia in China:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Infect Dis,2014,29:84-90.
MEHTA Y,HEGDE A,PANDE R,et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care unit setting of India:a review of clinical burden,patterns of prevalence,preventive measures,and future strategies[J]. Indian J Crit Care Med,2020,24(1):55-62.
RYBAK M J,LE J,LODISE T P,et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections:a revised consensus guideline and review by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists,the Infectious Diseases Society of America,the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society,and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm,2020,77(11):835-864.
COIA J E,WILSON J A,BAK A,et al. Joint Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) and Infection Prevention Society (IPS) guidelines for the prevention and control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthcare facilities[J]. J Hosp Infect,2021,118S:S1-S39.
BROWN N M,BROWN E M,GROUP G D. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA):updated guidelines from the UK[J]. J Antimicrob Chemother,2021,76(6):1377-1378.
HE N,SU S,YE Z K,et al. Evidence-based guideline for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin:2020 update by the division of therapeutic drug monitoring,Chinese Pharmacological Society[J]. Clin Infect Dis,2020,71(Suppl 4):S363-S371.
REUTER S E,STOCKER S L,ALFFENAAR J W C,et al. Optimal practice for vancomycin therapeutic drug monitoring:position statement from the Anti-infectives Committee of the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology[J]. Ther Drug Monit,2022,44(1):121-132.
MATSUMOTO K,TAKESUE Y,OHMAGARI N,et al. Practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin:a consensus review of the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring[J]. J Infect Chemother,2013,19(3):365-380.
RYBAK M,LOMAESTRO B,ROTSCHAFER J C,et al. Therapeutic monitoring of vancomycin in adult patients:a consensus review of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists,the Infectious Diseases Society of America,and the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists[J]. Am J Health Syst Pharm,2009,66(1):82-98.
TSUTSUURA M,MORIYAMA H,KOJIMA N,et al. The monitoring of vancomycin:a systematic review and meta-analyses of area under the concentration-time curve-guided dosing and trough-guided dosing[J]. BMC Infect Dis,2021,21(1):153.
KULLAR R,LEONARD S N,DAVIS S L,et al. Validation of the effectiveness of a vancomycin nomogram in achieving target trough concentrations of 15-20 mg/L suggested by the vancomycin consensus guidelines[J]. Pharmacotherapy,2011,31(5):441-448.
彭怀东,冯霞,王若伦. 重症患者万古霉素谷浓度监测回顾性研究[J]. 今日药学,2018,28(11):767-770,778.
KANE S P. Vancomycin Calculator[EB/OL].(2017-11-25)[2022-09-20]. https://clincalc.com/Vancomycin/Retired.aspxhttps://clincalc.com/Vancomycin/Retired.aspx.
MATSUMOTO K,ODA K,SHOJI K,et al. Clinical practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring of vancomycin in the framework of model-informed precision do- sing:a consensus review by the Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and the Japanese Society of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring[J]. Pharmaceutics,2022,14(3):489.
WINTER M E. Basic clinical pharmacokinetics[M].5th ed. Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins,2010:459-487.
KHWAJA A. KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for acute kidney injury[J]. Nephron Clin Pract,2012,120(4):c179-c184.
黄英姿,邱海波. 药代动力学导向的重症感染患者抗生素个体化与精准化治疗[J]. 中华内科杂志,2016,55(6):425-427.
明丹丹,李军,许璇,等. 真实世界研究的方法及其在临床研究中的应用[J]. 中国药房,2018,29(15):2138-2143.
STEINMETZ T,ELIAKIM-RAZ N,GOLDBERG E,et al. Association of vancomycin serum concentrations with efficacy in patients with MRSA infections:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Microbiol Infect,2015,21(7):665-673.
0
浏览量
29
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构