浏览全部资源
扫码关注微信
1.承德医学院中药研究所/河北省中药研究与开发重点实验室,河北 承德 067000
2.北京工业大学医院药剂科,北京 100124
3.神威药业集团有限公司,石家庄 051430
副教授,硕士。研究方向:中药分析。E-mail:liyanrong00001@163.com
教授,硕士生导师。研究方向:中药质量评价及中药配方颗粒。电话:0314-2291186。E-mail:phf2301@163.com
纸质出版日期:2023-11-30,
收稿日期:2023-06-19,
修回日期:2023-09-18,
扫 描 看 全 文
李艳荣,段丽颖,魏红等.指纹图谱结合一测多评法评价山楂叶质量 Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(22):2727-2733.
LI Yanrong,DUAN Liying,WEI Hong,et al.Quality evaluation of Crataegus pinnatifida leaves by fingerprint combined with quantitative analysis of multi-components by single-marker[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(22):2727-2733.
李艳荣,段丽颖,魏红等.指纹图谱结合一测多评法评价山楂叶质量 Δ[J].中国药房,2023,34(22):2727-2733. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.22.07.
LI Yanrong,DUAN Liying,WEI Hong,et al.Quality evaluation of Crataegus pinnatifida leaves by fingerprint combined with quantitative analysis of multi-components by single-marker[J].ZHONGGUO YAOFANG,2023,34(22):2727-2733. DOI: 10.6039/j.issn.1001-0408.2023.22.07.
目的
2
建立不同产地山楂叶药材的指纹图谱和多成分含量测定方法,评价其质量并筛选差异标志物。
方法
2
收集产自河北省承德市、辽宁省葫芦岛市、山西省运城市、山东省临沂市的78批山楂叶药材,采用高效液相色谱(HPLC)法,利用《中药色谱指纹图谱相似度评价系统(2012版)》绘制指纹图谱并进行相似度评价;采用SPSS 19.0、MetaboAnalyst 5.0工具、SIMCA 14.1软件等进行灰色关联分析、聚类分析(CA)、主成分分析(PCA)和正交偏最小二乘判别分析(OPLS-DA),以变量重要性投影(VIP)值>1且误差线不超过原点为标准筛选影响山楂叶质量的差异标志物。采用同一HPLC法结合一测多评(QAMS)法,以牡荆素鼠李糖苷为内参物,测定78批山楂叶药材中绿原酸、牡荆素葡萄糖苷、金丝桃苷和异槲皮素的含量,并与外标法测定结果进行比较。
结果
2
4个产地的78批山楂叶药材指纹图谱中有8个共有峰被标定,有5种成分[绿原酸(峰1)、牡荆素葡萄糖苷(峰3)、牡荆素鼠李糖苷(峰4)、金丝桃苷(峰7)和异槲皮素(峰8)]被指认,相似度为0.871~0.998。河北省承德市、辽宁省葫芦岛市、山西省运城市、山东省临沂市样品的平均相对关联度分别为0.538、0.528、0.462、0.435;CA、PCA分析均显示,河北省承德市和辽宁省葫芦岛市样品大致分为一类,山东省临沂市和山西省运城市样品大致分为一类;峰1、2、3、5的VIP值均大于1。QAMS法计算得绿原酸、牡荆素葡萄糖苷、金丝桃苷、异槲皮素的平均相对校正因子分别为0.401、0.993、1.670、1.615(RSD<2%);与外标法结果比较,除2批样品(S39、S41)中的异槲皮素外,其余批次样品中各成分的含量均无明显差异(相对偏差不高于5%)。
结论
2
所建指纹图谱和QAMS法操作简单,可用于评价山楂叶药材的质量;河北省承德市样品质量较优;绿原酸(峰1)、牡荆素葡萄糖苷(峰3)和峰2、5对应成分可能是影响山楂叶药材质量的差异标志物。
OBJECTIVE
2
To establish the fingerprint and multi-component content determination method of
Crataegus pinnatifida
leaves from different producing areas, and to evaluate the quality of
C. pinnatifida
leaves and screen the differential markers.
METHODS
2
Seventy-eight batches of
C. pinnatifida
leaves were collected from Chengde of Hebei Province, Huludao of Liaoning Province, Yuncheng of Shanxi Province and Linyi of Shandong Province. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and
Similarity Evaluation System for Traditional Chinese Medicine Chromatographic Fingerprints
(2012 edition) were used to draw the fingerprints and conduct similarity evaluation. Grey correlation analysis, cluster analysis (CA), principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares-discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) were performed by using SPSS 19.0, MetaboAnalyst 5.0 and SIMCA 14.1 software. The differential markers affecting the quality of
C. pinnatifida
leaves were screened with variable importance in the projection (VIP) value greater than 1 and the error line not exceeding the origin as the criterion. Using vitexin rhamnoside as an internal reference, the contents of chlorogenic acid, glucosylvitexin, hypericin and isoquercetin in 78 batches of
C. pinnatifida
leaves were determined by the same HPLC combined with quantitative analysis of multi-components by single-marker (QAMS), and the results were compared with external standard method.
RESULTS
2
Eight common peaks were calibrated in the fingerprints for 78 batches of
C. pinnatifida
leaves from 4 producing areas. Five known components were identified, including chlorogenic acid (peak 1), glucosylvitexin (peak 3), vitexin rhamnoside (peak 4), hypericin (peak 7) and isoquercetin (peak 8); their similarities ranged from 0.871 to 0.998. Average relative correlations of samples from Chengde of Hebei Province, Huludao of Liaoning Province, Yuncheng of Shanxi Province and Linyi of Shandong Province were 0.538, 0.528, 0.462 and 0.435, respectively. CA and PCA showed that the samples from Chengde of Hebei Province and Huludao of Liaoning Province were roughly classified into one category, while the samples from Linyi of Shandong Province and Yuncheng of Shanxi Province were roughly classified into one category; VIP values of peak 1, 2, 3 and 5 were all greater than 1. By QAMS, the relative correction factors of chlorogenic acid, glucosylvitexin, hypericin and isoquercetin were 0.401, 0.993, 1.670 and 1.615 (RSD<2%). Compared with external standard method, except for isoquercetin in the two batches of samples (S39 and S41), there was no significant difference in the content of each component in other batches of samples (the relative deviations≤5%).
CONCLUSIONS
2
The established fingerprint and QAMS method are simple to operate and can be used to evaluate the quality of
C. pinnatifida
leaves. The sample from Chengde of Hebei Province is relatively good in quality. Chlorogenic acid (peak 1), glucosylvitexin (peak 3), and the corresponding components of peaks 2 and 5 may be differential markers affecting the quality of
C. pinnatifida
leaves.
山楂叶指纹图谱一测多评法化学模式识别差异标志物
fingerprintsquantitative analysis of multi-components by single-markerchemical pattern recognitiondifferential marker
国家药典委员会.中华人民共和国药典:一部[M].2020年版. 北京:中国医药科技出版社,2020:33.
National Pharmacopoeia Commission. Chinese pharmacopoeia:part Ⅰ[M]. 2020 edition. Beijing:China Medical Science and Technology Press,2020:33.
MARTÍN-GARCÍA B,RAZOLA-DÍAZ M D C,GÓMEZ-CARAVACA A M,et al. Setup of an ultrasonic-assisted extraction to obtain high phenolic recovery in Crataegus monogyna leaves[J]. Molecules,2021,26(15):4536.
黄肖霄,牛超,高品一,等. 山楂叶的化学成分[J]. 沈阳药科大学学报,2010,27(8):615-617,638.
HUANG X X,NIU C,GAO P Y,et al. Chemical consti-tuents from the leaves of the Crataegus pinnatifida Bge[J]. J Shenyang Pharm Univ,2010,27(8):615-617,638.
李劲松,徐颖,孙涛. 山楂叶总黄酮药理作用研究进展[J]. 中药与临床,2017,8(6):64-65.
LI J S,XU Y,SUN T. Advances in studies of pharmacological effects of hawthorn leaves flavonoids[J]. Pharm Clin Chin Mater Med,2017,8(6):64-65.
胡慧明,官扬,翁家俊,等. 山楂叶黄酮对高脂血症小鼠的调脂保肝作用及其对肝组织HMGCR、LDLR表达的影响[J]. 中国现代应用药学,2020,37(21):2599-2604.
HU H M,GUAN Y,WENG J J,et al. Effects of hawthorn leaf flavonoids on regulating lipid and protecting liver and the expression of HMGCR and LDLR in hyperlipidemia mice[J]. Chin J Mod Appl Pharm,2020,37(21):2599-2604.
宋玉超,连超杰,李强,等. 山楂叶及其制剂对心血管作用的研究进展[J]. 现代药物与临床,2011,26(1):25-28.
SONG Y C,LIAN C J,LI Q,et al. Advances in study on hawthorn leaves and its preparations in cardiovascular system[J]. Drugs Clin,2011,26(1):25-28.
李艳荣,姚建伶,潘海峰. 灯盏花指纹图谱研究及一测多评法分析[J]. 中药材,2019,42(1):110-115.
LI Y R,YAO J L,PAN H F. The fingerprint of Erigeron breviscapus and QAMS analysis[J]. J Chin Med Mater,2019,42(1):110-115.
李强,杜思邈,张忠亮,等. 中药指纹图谱技术进展及未来发展方向展望[J]. 中草药,2013,44(22):3095-3104.
LI Q,DU S M,ZHANG Z L,et al. Progress in fingerprint technology on Chinese materia medica and prospect of its future development[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs,2013,44(22):3095-3104.
何兵,刘艳,李春红,等. 多指标定量指纹图谱在中药金银花质量评价中的应用[J]. 中国药学杂志,2015,50(14):1237-1242.
HE B,LIU Y,LI C H,et al. Quality control of Lonicerae Japonicae Flos by multi-marker components quantitative fingerprint[J]. Chin Pharm J,2015,50(14):1237-1242.
王智民,钱忠直,张启伟,等. 一测多评法建立的技术指南[J]. 中国中药杂志,2011,36(6):657-658.
WANG Z M,QIAN Z Z,ZHANG Q W,et al. Technical guide for the establishment of one test and multiple evaluation method[J]. China J Chin Mater Med,2011,36(6):657-658.
范耀耀,罗宇琴,李国卫,等. 基于灰色关联度分析与TOPSIS模型的不同产地射干标准汤剂质量评价[J]. 中药材,2022,45(3):659-663.
FAN Y Y,LUO Y Q,LI G W,et al. Quality evaluation of Belamcanda chinensis standard decoction from different producing areas based on grey relational analysis and TOPSIS model[J]. J Chin Med Mater,2022,45(3):659-663.
张琳琳,张文婷,唐登峰,等. 基于指纹图谱、多指标含量测定及化学计量学的宁心宝胶囊质量评价[J]. 中国药学杂志,2019,54(17):1425-1431.
ZHANG L L,ZHANG W T,TANG D F,et al. Quality evaluation of Ningxinbao capsules based on combinative method of HPLC fingerprint,quantitative analysis of multi-components and chemometrics[J]. Chin Pharm J,2019,54(17):1425-1431.
杨正明,威则日沙,李学学,等. 基于多元统计分析的川产道地药材江油附子和川乌中6种生物碱含量比较研究[J]. 中草药,2019,50(6):1461-1471.
YANG Z M,WEIZE R S,LI X X,et al. Comparative study on six alkaloids in Aconiti Lateralis Radix Praeparata and Aconiti Radix in Jiangyou of Sichuan Province based on multivariate statistical analysis[J]. Chin Tradit Herb Drugs,2019,50(6):1461-1471.
郭威,孙蓉,王亮,等. 基于指纹图谱和OPLS-DA的越南和国产土茯苓差异性化合物探索[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2017,23(14):62-67.
GUO W,SUN R,WANG L,et al. Discrimination markers of Smilacis Glabrae Rhizome from Vietnam and China based on fingerprint combined with OPLS-DA[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae,2017,23(14):62-67.
李明月. 心脉通胶囊的HPLC指纹图谱研究与化学模式识别[J]. 药物分析杂志,2020,40(6):1104-1112.
LI M Y. HPLC fingerprint and chemical pattern recognition of Xinmaitong capsules[J]. Chin J Pharm Anal,2020,40(6):1104-1112.
周昱杉,梁洁,黄光强,等. 基于化学模式识别方法分析止得咳颗粒的抗炎谱效关系[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2020,26(22):156-163.
ZHOU Y S,LIANG J,HUANG G Q,et al. Analysis on spectrum-effect relationship of anti-inflammatory effect of Zhideke granules based on chemical pattern recognition[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae,2020,26(22):156-163.
关海燕,宋小锋,杜晓娜,等. 不同生长期和不同加工方式山楂叶中总黄酮的含量测定[J]. 时珍国医国药,2019,30(11):2736-2737.
GUAN H Y,SONG X F,DU X N,et al. Determination of total flavonoids in hawthorn leaves in different growth stages and different processing methods[J]. Lishizhen Med Mater Med Res,2019,30(11):2736-2737.
薛非非,王勃,吕辰子,等. 款冬花不同炮制品的HPLC指纹图谱比较[J]. 中国实验方剂学杂志,2018,24(14):7-14.
XUE F F,WANG B,LYU C Z,et al. Comparison of HPLC fingerprints of different processed products of Far-farae Flos[J]. Chin J Exp Tradit Med Formulae,2018,24(14):7-14.
0
浏览量
4
下载量
0
CSCD
关联资源
相关文章
相关作者
相关机构